BF2S Forums Chinese and MEC

In the very near future, China and the Middle east are kept apart by highly trained Tibetan monks. thats why they are never in the same maps.

Paco_the_Insane wrote:

In the very near future, China and the Middle east are kept apart by highly trained Tibetan monks. thats why they are never in the same maps.

DOES YOUR SIG HAVE TO BE LIEK A HUGE BUILDING LOL! I RLY DONT CARE ABOUT JOOR STATS IN A 10000X0000 IMAGE IN MY FACE LOL, PLS RESIZE OR GTFO NOOB.

Paco_the_Insane wrote:

In the very near future, China and the Middle east are kept apart by highly trained Tibetan monks. thats why they are never in the same maps.

and the dalai lama becomes president of the united states.

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

gene_pool wrote:

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

DOES YOUR SIG HAVE TO BE LIEK A HUGE BUILDING LOL! I RLY DONT CARE ABOUT JOOR STATS IN A 10000X0000 IMAGE IN MY FACE LOL, PLS RESIZE OR GTFO NOOB.

....

LOL DOTS ^_^

ZINGZ

DaBombadier wrote:

Since there are no Chinese VS. MEC maps does that mean that they;'re allies and if not anyone else think there should be Chinese VS. MEC maps?

If there were maps like that .. the Chinese would pwn the MEC ass anyday

.:ronin:.|Patton wrote:

Paco_the_Insane wrote:

In the very near future, China and the Middle east are kept apart by highly trained Tibetan monks. thats why they are never in the same maps.

DOES YOUR SIG HAVE TO BE LIEK A HUGE BUILDING LOL! I RLY DONT CARE ABOUT JOOR STATS IN A 10000X0000 IMAGE IN MY FACE LOL, PLS RESIZE OR GTFO NOOB.

Last edited by arnica (2006-10-31 16:20:34)

ak47 or ak101 im pickin ak47 eh i cant help it and i think type 88 is a good as sniper (i think fuk all them type wtevers)

It will never happen because DICE is an anti-american bastard of a company. Think about it, all the Maps are USA vs XXX, the M1A1 Abrams is shit because if you hit a pebble the damn thing loses half of its life, the F35 is a piece of doo doo that in real life is the pwnage. It would be quite the sexy to see a J-10 and a Mig going at it...quite the sexy

chittydog wrote:

Pernicious544 wrote:

It will never happen because DICE is an anti-american bastard of a company. Think about it, all the Maps are USA vs XXX, the M1A1 Abrams is shit because if you hit a pebble the damn thing loses half of its life, the F35 is a piece of doo doo that in real life is the pwnage. It would be quite the sexy to see a J-10 and a Mig going at it...quite the sexy

Uh, if they're anti-American, they would probably WANT to make a map that leaves out the Americans...

lol exactly

Pernicious544 wrote:

DICE is an anti-american bastard of a company

roflmao, that's gold.

Pernicious544 wrote:

It will never happen because DICE is an anti-american bastard of a company. Think about it, all the Maps are USA vs XXX, the M1A1 Abrams is shit because if you hit a pebble the damn thing loses half of its life, the F35 is a piece of doo doo that in real life is the pwnage. It would be quite the sexy to see a J-10 and a Mig going at it...quite the sexy

The F-35, in RL, would be king, but the M1A2 isn't as great as everyone has hyped it to be. In some ways, the T-90 is much better, as well with the L2A6. I really don't think DICE is really anti-American though. Do they really love Chinese people more and secretly shellacked the J-10 so air-to-air missiles magically slide off of it? It's a problem that seems to be a tough bug to fix, and DICE doesn't want to fix it. Same with the Euro fighter... but it flies like a retarded duck, so it evens out a little, except missiles slide off it 95% of the time.

I'm a little ok with the US vs. *put faction here*, but what angers me is that they are mainly vs. MEC. Do they think they will appeal to Americans more because we happen to be at war in the Middle East? Hmm, maybe not that, but what about urban combat? There are more people and cities in Asia than the Middle East, so why do they get all the city maps? Something to think about.

Only infantry PLA map, which is quite good, is sadly in a booster that isn't played much. Great Wall would have been an awesome map to release in a patch. I've drifted off a little. Ok... I really think the army times would be a little more even out of the three. If you look at player's stats, most of the time, they have played the USMC the most, then MEC, then PLA, then some SF army. I've seen a few EU ones.

So anyways, if the game comes with 12 maps, then all you got to do is have each army featured 8 times. Maybe DICE should give new map options to chose which army gets played on what map on their server.

Hellogoodsir wrote:

I'm a little ok with the US vs. *put faction here*, but what angers me is that they are mainly vs. MEC. Do they think they will appeal to Americans more because we happen to be at war in the Middle East? Hmm, maybe not that, but what about urban combat? There are more people and cities in Asia than the Middle East, so why do they get all the city maps? Something to think about.

no if the US ever went to war with China the Chinese would try to keep the US out of their urban cities, plus the US would mostly be bombing cities not directly assaulting them.

DaBombadier wrote:

Hellogoodsir wrote:

I'm a little ok with the US vs. *put faction here*, but what angers me is that they are mainly vs. MEC. Do they think they will appeal to Americans more because we happen to be at war in the Middle East? Hmm, maybe not that, but what about urban combat? There are more people and cities in Asia than the Middle East, so why do they get all the city maps? Something to think about.

no if the US ever went to war with China the Chinese would try to keep the US out of their urban cities, plus the US would mostly be bombing cities not directly assaulting them.

Lol, any country thats invaded by any other country would try to keep them out of their urban cities.

In response to the topic of the thread: This has been discussed, the two factions are apparently neutral towards each other.

Last edited by Disabl3d (2006-11-20 16:21:11)