heck, how hard would it be to standardize the UK? you all speak english anyway.
- Index »
- Community »
- Everything Else »
- Should the English language be standerised? and why
Having an universal language that everyone on the planet speaks as a second language would be great. But getting rid of all the other languages would not be good, because of cultural reasons mainly. Besides, it would be damn boring if everyone spoke exactly like the other.
I like, you like, we like!White-Fusion wrote:
"by standardised it means that like we should all use the same words it would eliminate the use of words from certain regions and like we would all be able to understand each other cos we'd all use the same words there would be no variation in like english language culture if you could call it that"
her words
No it doesnt, it just argues both sides.White-Fusion wrote:
jord i like your thinking, but that argues the case against standerisiation
Yeah thanks,well generally speaking when i write an essay i present both sides to the argument.Then in a conclsuion i put more points forward for my side.White-Fusion wrote:
jord i like your thinking, but that argues the case against standerisiation
To easy.Paco_the_Insane wrote:
heck, how hard would it be to standardize the UK? you all speak english anyway.
Last edited by jord (2006-11-15 13:03:06)
Shes putting jords idea in the conclusion
I dont write my essays, I bribe my teacher to do it
hmmm?
Ĉu vi parolas Esperanton?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto_language
Ĉu vi parolas Esperanton?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto_language
Last edited by TPM-J45P3R- (2006-11-15 13:12:31)
Then teddy pays the teacher in sex
Holllyyy shite, i thought my FX 5500 was bad
*hawt*
Last edited by ..teddy..jimmy (2006-11-15 13:09:21)
If by standardized you mean everybody speaks it, then I'll pass. The world would be pretty damn boring if English was "the one" language, not to mention I'm sure there's some intellectual benefit to studying a foreign language.
If you mean taught as much as Spanish is in the USA, then I dont see a problem with that.
If you mean taught as much as Spanish is in the USA, then I dont see a problem with that.
Did any of you take the english language at A level by any chance?
Im taking IB A english which much harder than A levels
http://www.ibo.org/
http://www.ibo.org/
Last edited by ..teddy..jimmy (2006-11-15 13:11:21)
see, if there was a standard language, everyone could read this wonderful message.
lies teddy, you told me you havent been to school for 10 years
YES!!! you got it. I love you PACOPaco_the_Insane wrote:
see, if there was a standard language, everyone could read this wonderful message.
TEDDY=17 NOT 27 :pWhite-Fusion wrote:
lies teddy, you told me you havent been to school for 10 years
exacttly teddy, you havent been since you were 7
Do you mean harder that GCSE English?
Not to mention they have MANY different dialects.Simon wrote:
Chinese is only most used because there are like 20000 Billion of themPaco_the_Insane wrote:
yes, because if they used a standard language, it should be something that uses an alphabet of 26 letters, not like, a billion. and english is second most used, to chinese, and chinese sucks.
No, I took the IGCSE last year(fucking easy). IB is a system designed to be more challenging than A levels. I only do it because I go to an international schooljord wrote:
Do you mean harder that GCSE English?
Anymore opinions Jord?
Jordøøøø?
well anyone, but one of jords comments was perfect and is going into the essay
- Index »
- Community »
- Everything Else »
- Should the English language be standerised? and why