Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
im reading aboutwidescreen monitors....

2.16ghz
1gb ram
6800gs 256mb

Is this adeqaute to play bf2 on widescreen 19"?
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|7005|UK

Bertster7 wrote:

Bell wrote:

Techworld wrote:

Im also reading of some problems running bf2 with widescreen... can you confirm how to make it work and does the picture look stretched?
You heard right, bf2 simply does not support widescreen atall, there are ways to get a widescreen display on it, although all that does is stetch the image across the screen, so everything looks fat.

Martyn
No. I'm running it in widescreen and it does work fine. I play it in 1680x1050 all the time, it looks fine, not fat. It's not identical, but it's not just stretched across the screen. That is what happens if you set the resolution through the in game menu as no widescreen resolutions are listed. If you force the right resolution you don't get that problem.
https://img458.imageshack.us/img458/3811/screen0005ytso9.jpg

Like that ^^^?  Looks fat to me...

Martyn
Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
I dont see fat? that looks rather ok to me?


SO, do you think i should get that 3ms "gamers" one ?
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7037|SE London

Bell wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Bell wrote:


You heard right, bf2 simply does not support widescreen atall, there are ways to get a widescreen display on it, although all that does is stetch the image across the screen, so everything looks fat.

Martyn
No. I'm running it in widescreen and it does work fine. I play it in 1680x1050 all the time, it looks fine, not fat. It's not identical, but it's not just stretched across the screen. That is what happens if you set the resolution through the in game menu as no widescreen resolutions are listed. If you force the right resolution you don't get that problem.
http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/3811 … 5ytso9.jpg

Like that ^^^?  Looks fat to me...

Martyn
No, not like that.

That resolution is 1280x720. Which is not a good resolution to run it in. If you have a widescreen monitor and run it in native resolution (I don't know of any that run that as a native resolution, although they may exist), it looks much better than that. As I said, I run it in 1680x1050 which is a 16:10 aspect ratio. 19" widescreens tend to be slightly lower res, but the same aspect ratio, 1440x900 I believe.

If I can be bothered I'll post some screenies later.
Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
Im 90% decided to buy that 3ms one ... should i click buy? Does it have alot more space, as you would have on a regular 19"?
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7037|SE London

It does look pretty good from the specs. But only way to find out about manufacturers is either through trial and error, from people who own them or from reputable reviews.

I think it looks perfectly good.

Personally I'd go for this:

http://www.ebuyer.com/UK/product/114209/rb/23441462263

over that, despite the lower response timings (which once they're under 8ms are fine, 5, 3, 2 - you won't notice the difference between them) because I've had a lot of good experiences with monitors from that manufacturer. It's a bit cheaper too.

Widescreens do seem to have a lot more space when you're using windows. They don't have more space, it's just laid out nicer.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2006-12-01 13:15:26)

Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
ok, which of the two should i go for?the one you showed me is good, lots of reviews on it.

the 3ms one has 40,000 minimum life, thats like 5 years on 24/7.

Last edited by Techworld (2006-12-01 13:31:02)

p3lvicthrust
Banned
+16|6857

Gawwad wrote:

Can't say anything about those. I don't know any of the manufacturers. If you're gonna go with one of those, take one with 8MS refresh rate. 12MS is too slow.
dudes able to notice qualities in 4miliseconds lol

just go for the 19inch

Last edited by p3lvicthrust (2006-12-01 13:50:20)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7037|SE London

p3lvicthrust wrote:

Gawwad wrote:

Can't say anything about those. I don't know any of the manufacturers. If you're gonna go with one of those, take one with 8MS refresh rate. 12MS is too slow.
dudes able to notice qualities in 4miliseconds lol

just go for the 19inch
Above 8ms is noticably worse than below. For gaming you want under 8ms.

The difference past that isn't really noticable though.
Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
Im  thinking of going with the belinea one because it has a load of good reviews, and is a more reputable brand ? http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products … uid=114209
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|7005|UK

Bertster7 wrote:

Bell wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


No. I'm running it in widescreen and it does work fine. I play it in 1680x1050 all the time, it looks fine, not fat. It's not identical, but it's not just stretched across the screen. That is what happens if you set the resolution through the in game menu as no widescreen resolutions are listed. If you force the right resolution you don't get that problem.
http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/3811 … 5ytso9.jpg

Like that ^^^?  Looks fat to me...

Martyn
No, not like that.

That resolution is 1280x720. Which is not a good resolution to run it in. If you have a widescreen monitor and run it in native resolution (I don't know of any that run that as a native resolution, although they may exist), it looks much better than that. As I said, I run it in 1680x1050 which is a 16:10 aspect ratio. 19" widescreens tend to be slightly lower res, but the same aspect ratio, 1440x900 I believe.

If I can be bothered I'll post some screenies later.
I think that picture I used (not mine btw) was only uploaded in 1280x720 so it may of be different actually, infact I am pretty sure I nicked that from someone on this form .  I see how it wouldnt be stretched now from the 16:10 as tht tends to stretch it upward, so the widescreen pulling it out should cancel each other out (never thought of that, good idea running 16:10 rather than usual 16:9 for trying widescreen on a non supported game)

Martyn
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7037|SE London

Bell wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Bell wrote:


You heard right, bf2 simply does not support widescreen atall, there are ways to get a widescreen display on it, although all that does is stetch the image across the screen, so everything looks fat.

Martyn
No. I'm running it in widescreen and it does work fine. I play it in 1680x1050 all the time, it looks fine, not fat. It's not identical, but it's not just stretched across the screen. That is what happens if you set the resolution through the in game menu as no widescreen resolutions are listed. If you force the right resolution you don't get that problem.
http://img458.imageshack.us/img458/3811 … 5ytso9.jpg

Like that ^^^?  Looks fat to me...

Martyn
Here's what it looks like on mine.

https://img64.imageshack.us/img64/1942/bf21680kh4.jpg

Not so fat at an actual proper widescreen res, is it?
Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
lol hate that map

Doesnt look fat at all ...... going for a widescreen:)

btw: what is this monitor 16:9 or 16:10

Last edited by Techworld (2006-12-01 14:08:09)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7037|SE London

Techworld wrote:

lol hate that map

Doesnt look fat at all ...... going for a widescreen:)

btw: what is this monitor 16:9 or 16:10
1440x900.

1440/900 = 1.6.

Therefore 16:10.
Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
Finallly...... should i click buy on thnis now : http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products … uid=114209

Is the text small, on desktop etc on a 1440 x 900 ? could you make a screenie
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7037|SE London

Techworld wrote:

Finallly...... should i click buy on thnis now : http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products … uid=114209

Is the text small, on desktop etc on a 1440 x 900 ? could you make a screenie
Not very easily. Can't really be bothered, sorry.

I'd have to change my res to a custom resolution, 'cos I run a higher res than that (1680x1050). I'd also have to change my desktop, 'cos at the moment it's got tits on it.

Go for it.

I setup a PC with one of those monitors earlier, I think you'll be very pleased with it.

Last edited by Bertster7 (2006-12-01 14:17:52)

Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
does this have anti-glare etc?
Techworld
Banned
+17|6858
bought
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7037|SE London

Let us know how you find it once you've got it.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard