BF2S Forums What kind of frames are you guys getting?

Pernicious544 wrote:

Same settings as you but in the mid 20s to low 80s

2.8 ghz p4
2gb ram
X850XT 256

Any lag?

when the doodoo is hitting the fan then it "feels off" (low frames) but when Im on my own it is usually in the 30s to 40s. On the titan though....Im lucky if I get any higher then 4. So to ansure your question, lag when its busy and when on the titan but everywhere else Im fine. Just to be sure I usually run it on mediuam as high and medium look exactly the same.

Oh yeah, mediums = 40s to 70s depending on the activity of what I see

Last edited by Pernicious544 (2006-12-11 22:24:20)

Pernicious544 wrote:

when the doodoo is hitting the fan then it "feels off" (low frames) but when Im on my own it is usually in the 30s to 40s. On the titan though....Im lucky if I get any higher then 4. So to ansure your question, lag when its busy and when on the titan but everywhere else Im fine. Just to be sure I usually run it on mediuam as high and medium look exactly the same.

Oh yeah, mediums = 40s to 70s depending on the activity of what I see

WTF do the 2142 Titans have to do with BF2?

x800GTO
AMD 64 2800+ skt754
1GB DDR400

1024x768
Medium-High (Geometry on High w/ rest on medium)
6x AA
---

65-100FPS...If I turn off AA I average over 90.

And a 9600 cant run all High.

Last edited by reefl3x (2006-12-11 22:29:55)

I had to have the bare minimums too a week ago. This is what I had

800x600
Everything 1 (Low) except
Effects 2 (see grenades, GL smoke, jet wing pressure thingers)
Geometry 2 (how stuff is drawn far away)
View Distance 100 (Just leave it 100 srsly)

That way you see what everyone else sees except useless shit like grass

Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:

WTF do the 2142 Titans have to do with BF2?

They hit 88?

Last edited by Cheez (2006-12-11 22:30:45)

Drunken_Tankdriver wrote:

What kind of frames per second are you guys getting with what hardware configuration and game video configuration?


I noticed my computer does poorly when everythings set to high at 1024x768 resolution.

I am getting 15.0/66



I am running:

2.0Ghz AMD Athlon XP
1.5GB DDR 266 Ram
256mb Radeon 9600


What are you guys running? Can you run your game on high settings without lag?

Dunno...
1 gig of 266 ram
Radeo 9550

8-30 (If I'm lucky) On ALL low.

I've got

INTEL Core2Duo 6400
1Gb ddr2 ram
Nvidia 7600 GS
about 30-40 fps

It's not great, and yet it works fine on normal (medium) settings, and on 1680 x 1050 (native widescreen) resolution.  No lag, except for the occasional interuption for about a second or so when the internet is used by someone else.

Last edited by some_random_panda (2006-12-11 22:36:19)

Fenris_GreyClaw wrote:

Pernicious544 wrote:

when the doodoo is hitting the fan then it "feels off" (low frames) but when Im on my own it is usually in the 30s to 40s. On the titan though....Im lucky if I get any higher then 4. So to ansure your question, lag when its busy and when on the titan but everywhere else Im fine. Just to be sure I usually run it on mediuam as high and medium look exactly the same.

Oh yeah, mediums = 40s to 70s depending on the activity of what I see

WTF do the 2142 Titans have to do with BF2?

Everyone expects all of the threads to be about 2142 these days...

reefl3x wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

I've got

INTEL Core2Duo 6400
1Gb ddr2 ram
Nvidia 7600 GS
about 30-40 fps

It's not great, and yet it works fine on normal (medium) settings, and on 1680 x 1050 (native widescreen) resolution.  No lag, except for the occasional interuption for about a second or so when the internet is used by someone else.

You only get 30-40FPS even on medium settings?
Hmmm i'd expect a 7600GS & core 2 duo to smoke BF2...I'd suspect your bottlneck is your video card.
Thats not right. I average over 65fps all medium w/ a x800gto, amd 64 2800+ 1GB ddr.

I'd check & make sure nothing wrong, both software & hardware wise.

ok, will do

[Intel Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz]
2 Gigs
RADEON X1600

VideoSettings.setTerrainQuality 3
VideoSettings.setGeometryQuality 3
VideoSettings.setLightingQuality 2
VideoSettings.setDynamicLightingQuality 1
VideoSettings.setDynamicShadowsQuality 1
VideoSettings.setEffectsQuality 3
VideoSettings.setTextureQuality 3
VideoSettings.setTextureFilteringQuality 3
VideoSettings.setResolution 1024x768@60Hz
VideoSettings.setAntialiasing 2Samples
VideoSettings.setViewDistanceScale 1
VideoSettings.setVideoOptionScheme 3

I get approx. 50-70 Fps

WEll i can run everything on max but i want perfomence, and i dont talk about fps or any lag but about gameplay. u guys are stupid because when u actually but dynamic_shadow and dynamic_light on max, u lost view over distance or dark areas. Its better to put it on med even if its a bit less realistic.

0seb--morin0 wrote:

WEll i can run everything on max but i want perfomence, and i dont talk about fps or any lag but about gameplay. u guys are stupid because when u actually but dynamic_shadow and dynamic_light on max, u lost view over distance or dark areas. Its better to put it on med even if its a bit less realistic.

Huh your wrong.
Lighting is the setting which casts the shadows for buildings thus allowing players to hide in there shadows.
Dynamic shadows only casts shadows for moving objects (i.e the word "Dynamic"). Dynamic Shadows has no effect on viewing ability, only lighting does.

And secondly Dynamic Lights can reveal a players position in a buildings shadow, so for anyone with lighting on medium or higher, dynamic lights is a must have, and its performance hit is far less than dynamic shadows. But anyone with a nice sized monitor can see a player in a buildings shadows.

And 3rdly were not stupid because we enjoy running the game at higher settings.
So while having lighting on "low" does allow you to see better, its not something a player must do.

You might want to get your facts straight before you call people stupid.
So to sum it all up, the Dynamic settings in no way effect a players ability to see other players, only lighting does.

Last edited by reefl3x (2006-12-11 23:24:57)