Okilee dokilee. This is for space nuts only, so go away if you don't like the wonders of spa ce.
Now, I'm having a tough decision between two telescopes.
This one: http://telescopes.com/products/celestro … 32981.html
Celestron NexStar 130SLT
Pro's:
- Computerized (4000+ object database)
- Fairly large aperture
- great reviews
- easy to align and set up
- The handheld controller is easy to use.
Con's:
- Can get a much larger telescope for only a few dollars more
- Worried that I might not be able to see all that I want to.
- Uses batteries for the computer
Or this one: http://telescopes.com/products/zhumell- … 38399.html
Zhumell 10" Dobsonian Reflector
Pro's:
- Larger aperture (more light gathering ability)
- Will be able to see what I want to see (that's a definite)
- Looks very nice and professional
Con's:
- Heavier (60lbs)
- Costs more
- Not computerized (I prefer computerized, so it's easier for me)
So which one should I go for and why? I'm leaning towards the 130SLT, just because it's user-friendly, and is computerized.
Now, I'm having a tough decision between two telescopes.
This one: http://telescopes.com/products/celestro … 32981.html
Celestron NexStar 130SLT
Pro's:
- Computerized (4000+ object database)
- Fairly large aperture
- great reviews
- easy to align and set up
- The handheld controller is easy to use.
Con's:
- Can get a much larger telescope for only a few dollars more
- Worried that I might not be able to see all that I want to.
- Uses batteries for the computer
Or this one: http://telescopes.com/products/zhumell- … 38399.html
Zhumell 10" Dobsonian Reflector
Pro's:
- Larger aperture (more light gathering ability)
- Will be able to see what I want to see (that's a definite)
- Looks very nice and professional
Con's:
- Heavier (60lbs)
- Costs more
- Not computerized (I prefer computerized, so it's easier for me)
So which one should I go for and why? I'm leaning towards the 130SLT, just because it's user-friendly, and is computerized.
Last edited by ryan_14 (2007-03-05 18:36:59)