Ryan
Member
+1,230|7293|Alberta, Canada

Okilee dokilee. This is for space nuts only, so go away if you don't like the wonders of spa    ce.

Now, I'm having a tough decision between two telescopes.

This one: http://telescopes.com/products/celestro … 32981.html

Celestron NexStar 130SLT

Pro's:
- Computerized (4000+ object database)
- Fairly large aperture
- great reviews
- easy to align and set up
- The handheld controller is easy to use.

Con's:
- Can get a much larger telescope for only a few dollars more
- Worried that I might not be able to see all that I want to.
- Uses batteries for the computer

Or this one: http://telescopes.com/products/zhumell- … 38399.html

Zhumell 10" Dobsonian Reflector

Pro's:
- Larger aperture (more light gathering ability)
- Will be able to see what I want to see (that's a definite)
- Looks very nice and professional

Con's:
- Heavier (60lbs)
- Costs more
- Not computerized (I prefer computerized, so it's easier for me)

So which one should I go for and why? I'm leaning towards the 130SLT, just because it's user-friendly, and is computerized.

Last edited by ryan_14 (2007-03-05 18:36:59)

Ryan
Member
+1,230|7293|Alberta, Canada

Also, what would this look like in a 5" or 6" telescope?
https://www.space-and-telescope.com/images/astronomy/orionSmaller.jpg

That image was taken from an 8".
I would be so proud if I could get a 8"-10" Dobsonian that is computerized

Last edited by ryan_14 (2007-03-05 18:54:35)

Ryan
Member
+1,230|7293|Alberta, Canada

Nevermind, got most of my answers anyways.
morphman001
Member
+9|7012|Melbourne
yummo...),both are nice tele,s.As u probably know,the bigger the better but so is the price..(
Please post some of your time-lapse(long exposure) pics,if thats what u r gonna do,as im an astronamy nut to..)
morphman001
Member
+9|7012|Melbourne
Do u have a dark sky where u are,ie:as no light pollution?
Ganko_06
Laughter with an S
+167|7095|Camoran's Paradise
Buy the Hubble.
Side note: You made the first two responses to your own thread.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7293|Alberta, Canada

Yeah, I added more to my post Ganko.

I think I', gunna go for the 5". It's designed more for DSOs and fairly good for planetary viewing.
The dob is more for planets, but it can gather more light, and get a more detailed picture.

I don;t live in too much light pollution, but it doesn't seem to get really dark as to where I can see about 2000-3000 stars (which is what you can see on a very dark night).

Also, I don't have a T-ring for my telescope, so I can't take pictures.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard