Ok?jonsimon wrote:
Not justification, just context.
Puts it all quite well..........
They're both equally bad - killing civilians = killing civilians = killing civilians. You're asking me 'which murder is best?'. lolusmarine2005 wrote:
Pissing, killing, human bomb, car bomb, rockets......Kmarion wrote:
Your such an Islamaphobe..lolCameronPoe wrote:
If a Palestinian pissed on the head of some guy he'd just killed I would think it fucking deplorable and rightly so.
Tell me which one is worse?
Last edited by CameronPoe (2007-05-11 02:09:02)
I think this is the part where we start getting into logical disconnect territory, where "War is hell, civilians get killed in war" is uttered in almost the same breath as "They're bad because they kill civilians". Then we're supposed to see that while intentionally bombing a crowded civilian area with a few pounds of Semtex is wrong and evil, intentionally bombing a crowded civilian area using either aircraft or artillery is okay fine. It's interesting how once an armed force reaches a certain level of technological sophistication, civilian casualties reclassify from "atrocity" to "statistic" and you can palm off those statistics by saying you weren't intentionally targetting them. Obviously their fault for living somewhere that a war could break out.CameronPoe wrote:
They're both equally bad - killing civilians = killing civilians = killing civilians. You're asking me 'which murder is best?'. lol
lol lol lol lol lol.....Are you going to say lol after everything like some school girl?CameronPoe wrote:
They're both equally bad - killing civilians = killing civilians = killing civilians. You're asking me 'which murder is best?'. lolusmarine2005 wrote:
Pissing, killing, human bomb, car bomb, rockets......Kmarion wrote:
Your such an Islamaphobe..lol
Tell me which one is worse?
I asked you what was worse, getting killed or getting pissed on. If they are equally just as bad, you basically justify Palestinians blowing shit up. So it seems you do not have an issue with the act, but the people performing the act.
And HOS, that is not what I was saying at all, please read again.
You marched in, destroyed most of their infrastructure, and started a massive and brutal civil war after decades of fomenting conflict with Iran.Kmarion wrote:
No it doesn't. Unfortunately it only takes one act of hypocrisy to diminish 100 acts of kindness.
You don't think maybe the acts of kindness are just overdue "sorry for screwing you over" payments?
Last edited by Bubbalo (2007-05-11 08:04:41)
I was referring to the soldiers specifically. I know it's hard for you to comprehend but the majority of them are caring people. They themselves did not decide to "march in" and start allow a civil war secretarian hate.Bubbalo wrote:
You marched in, destroyed most of their infrastructure, and started a massive and brutal civil war after decades of fomenting conflict with Iran.Kmarion wrote:
No it doesn't. Unfortunately it only takes one act of hypocrisy to diminish 100 acts of kindness.
You don't think maybe the acts of kindness are just overdue "sorry for screwing you over" payments?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
lolusmarine2005 wrote:
lol lol lol lol lol.....Are you going to say lol after everything like some school girl?CameronPoe wrote:
They're both equally bad - killing civilians = killing civilians = killing civilians. You're asking me 'which murder is best?'. lolusmarine2005 wrote:
Pissing, killing, human bomb, car bomb, rockets......
Tell me which one is worse?
I asked you what was worse, getting killed or getting pissed on. If they are equally just as bad, you basically justify Palestinians blowing shit up. So it seems you do not have an issue with the act, but the people performing the act.
And HOS, that is not what I was saying at all, please read again.
PS The guy pissed on the guy he'd just murdered.
It could be worse, they might have hung their charred corpses from a bridge over the Euphrates.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I know. Say he didn't piss on him, would it be ok with you?CameronPoe wrote:
lolusmarine2005 wrote:
lol lol lol lol lol.....Are you going to say lol after everything like some school girl?CameronPoe wrote:
They're both equally bad - killing civilians = killing civilians = killing civilians. You're asking me 'which murder is best?'. lol
I asked you what was worse, getting killed or getting pissed on. If they are equally just as bad, you basically justify Palestinians blowing shit up. So it seems you do not have an issue with the act, but the people performing the act.
And HOS, that is not what I was saying at all, please read again.
PS The guy pissed on the guy he'd just murdered.
Like I said, you seem to care more about WHO does the killing, rather then care about the killing itself.
The guy murdered him and, if that wasn't enough, pissed on his dead body. How can you defend this guy? Or maybe then, WHY are you defending him?usmarine2005 wrote:
I know. Say he didn't piss on him, would it be ok with you?CameronPoe wrote:
lolusmarine2005 wrote:
lol lol lol lol lol.....Are you going to say lol after everything like some school girl?
I asked you what was worse, getting killed or getting pissed on. If they are equally just as bad, you basically justify Palestinians blowing shit up. So it seems you do not have an issue with the act, but the people performing the act.
And HOS, that is not what I was saying at all, please read again.
PS The guy pissed on the guy he'd just murdered.
Like I said, you seem to care more about WHO does the killing, rather then care about the killing itself.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Are you blind? Where am I defending him? He is a piece of shit.EVieira wrote:
The guy murdered him and, if that wasn't enough, pissed on his dead body. How can you defend this guy? Or maybe then, WHY are you defending him?
Now, I am questioning Cam's "outrage."
But they're fucked up like that. You should be somewhat proud that most your guys aren't like that. Unless you think "if they do that, so should we" but then you're just as bad as them. Then you're right there at the bottom with them.Kmarion wrote:
It could be worse, they might have hung their charred corpses from a bridge over the Euphrates.
You were in the marines, and you aren't outraged of what this guy did? Is it that common for american troops to do this kind of thing?usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you blind? Where am I defending him? He is a piece of shit.EVieira wrote:
The guy murdered him and, if that wasn't enough, pissed on his dead body. How can you defend this guy? Or maybe then, WHY are you defending him?
Now, I am questioning Cam's "outrage."
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Of course I don't. And not all of "them" feel that way neither. That was the point.Mekstizzle wrote:
But they're fucked up like that. You should be somewhat proud that most your guys aren't like that. Unless you think "if they do that, so should we" but then you're just as bad as them. Then you're right there at the bottom with them.Kmarion wrote:
It could be worse, they might have hung their charred corpses from a bridge over the Euphrates.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Quit playing on words. Don't be a fucking asshole. I have said it in many threads about troops like this. I said it when this story first broke. This place is like a broken record.EVieira wrote:
You were in the marines, and you aren't outraged of what this guy did? Is it that common for american troops to do this kind of thing?usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you blind? Where am I defending him? He is a piece of shit.EVieira wrote:
The guy murdered him and, if that wasn't enough, pissed on his dead body. How can you defend this guy? Or maybe then, WHY are you defending him?
Now, I am questioning Cam's "outrage."
Of course its not common for an american soldiers to murder people and piss on bodies, but its damn right outrageous. Its a rhetorical question not word play at all.usmarine2005 wrote:
Quit playing on words. Don't be a fucking asshole. I have said it in many threads about troops like this. I said it when this story first broke. This place is like a broken record.EVieira wrote:
You were in the marines, and you aren't outraged of what this guy did? Is it that common for american troops to do this kind of thing?usmarine2005 wrote:
Are you blind? Where am I defending him? He is a piece of shit.
Now, I am questioning Cam's "outrage."
The only broken record here is how defensive you get on these issues...
Last edited by EVieira (2007-05-11 09:35:39)
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
This story is awful. The soldiers should get what ever comes to them. What about the Insurgents, Sunnis, Shia, and others commit atrocities like this everyday. Yet they are always the victims. Sometimes I feel like some of you actually slap high fives when a Humvee hits an IED. Muttering .....fuck Bush, ......Fuck the US. Just my 2 cents.
You seem to be confused. I AM NOT defending this guy. I am questioning why Cam is so outraged at this, yet finds ways to justify a Palestinian blowing himself up in a crowded cafe.EVieira wrote:
The only broken record here is how defensive you get on these issues...
Marine, you are repeating yourself so I guess you are confused a bit. I'm going to type this slowly then, to see if you get my point:usmarine2005 wrote:
You seem to be confused. I AM NOT defending this guy. I am questioning why Cam is so outraged at this, yet finds ways to justify a Palestinian blowing himself up in a crowded cafe.EVieira wrote:
The only broken record here is how defensive you get on these issues...
I'm questioning how the hell you, as an american and ex-marine DON'T find it outrageous. You have much more reason, in my view, to find this outrageous then Cam or me.
Now here a repost of what I said:
EVieira wrote:
Of course its not common for an american soldiers to murder people and piss on bodies, but its damn right outrageous. Its a rhetorical question not word play at all.usmarine2005 wrote:
Quit playing on words. Don't be a fucking asshole. I have said it in many threads about troops like this. I said it when this story first broke. This place is like a broken record.EVieira wrote:
You were in the marines, and you aren't outraged of what this guy did? Is it that common for american troops to do this kind of thing?
The only broken record here is how defensive you get on these issues...
Last edited by EVieira (2007-05-11 09:46:05)
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
I am outraged.
But you are quoting a conversation I am having with Cam about something.
If you would like to just talk about this topic, and not but in to what Cam and I are discussing, I would be more than happy.
But you are quoting a conversation I am having with Cam about something.
If you would like to just talk about this topic, and not but in to what Cam and I are discussing, I would be more than happy.
Me too. I try to see the US troops as the good guys here, its not their fault they are there.usmarine2005 wrote:
I am outraged.
Sorry, I'm debate any post on this forum that I feel like. You want to debate privately, use PMs or go to a chat chat place.usmarine2005 wrote:
But you are quoting a conversation I am having with Cam about something.
If you would like to just talk about this topic, and not but in to what Cam and I are discussing, I would be more than happy.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
And you are obviously free to. But maybe you shouldn't in ALL situations.EVieira wrote:
Sorry, I'm debate any post on this forum that I feel like. You want to debate privately, use PMs or go to a chat chat place.
Well, seeing an american ex-marine questioning other peoples outrage over the murder and profanity of dead bodies by US soldiers is one situation I won't pass on.usmarine2005 wrote:
And you are obviously free to. But maybe you shouldn't in ALL situations.EVieira wrote:
Sorry, I'm debate any post on this forum that I feel like. You want to debate privately, use PMs or go to a chat chat place.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
It is just a pissing match as usual with Cam and I. Don't read too much into it dude.EVieira wrote:
Well, seeing an american ex-marine questioning other peoples outrage over the murder and profanity of dead bodies by US soldiers is one situation I won't pass on.usmarine2005 wrote:
And you are obviously free to. But maybe you shouldn't in ALL situations.EVieira wrote:
Sorry, I'm debate any post on this forum that I feel like. You want to debate privately, use PMs or go to a chat chat place.
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-05-11 10:12:48)