BF2S Forums Meta Poll - Pussification, Lootification, Islamification?

er... All of the above.

People are scared of Islamification, when they should just try to prevent it (Thus Pussification), even though tbh i don't feel threatened at all, i'm more worried about my exam results.  And corporate greed will prevent viable solutions to Oil until it's too late (Lootification).

Does that count?

Mekstizzle wrote:

er... All of the above.

People are scared of Islamification, when they should just try to prevent it (Thus Pussification), even though tbh i don't feel threatened at all, i'm more worried about my exam results.  And corporate greed will prevent viable solutions to Oil until it's too late (Lootification).

Does that count?

I like that type of thinking!

Here is a slight variation of that idea.

Islamification is used (as propaganda) by those who want Lootification (of the public, i.e. America) and claim Pussification so that Islamification seems real, thus making a never-ending cycle of Lootification.

you should have put a word which means when people are starting to be lazy, unable to fight anything because it's too tiring, and also ready to do ANYTHING as long as they still have their little shitty way of live aka TV and food even if freedom must be lost. This is what's happening right now. That's the first threat. Then of course come immediatly Islamification (Islamists can burn in hell) and then pussification (what's lootification anyway?)

topal63 wrote:

Enzzenmachine wrote:

... what's lootification anyway?

Corporate thievery - or greed (looting).

ah it's come from looting haha lol I got it now

Pussification.

A threat is an imminent risk, therefore Lootification is not a threat. It is a risk that has already been realized.

Islamification is not a threat either, because it is neither a risk nor is it imminent.

IMO, it's the EMOfication of the world. It's even worse in the girls because they are the first educators of children. Moral and social decay will bring down this world fast.

Islamification now just like Communism earlier. Only difference is 1 is an idealogy the other is a religion and no matter what you do you cannot justify the elimination of a religious group.(Maybe scientology but thats another story)

Havok wrote:

David.P wrote:

Islamification now just like Communism earlier. Only difference is 1 is an idealogy the other is a religion and no matter what you do you cannot justify the elimination of a religious group.(Maybe scientology but thats another story)

Scientology isn't a religion, it's a cult of stupidity.

QFT

But anyway, I'd say pussification is least of these 3 evils.

Islamification/Islamism is probably the worst, closely followed by lootification.

I say Islamification/Islamism because it not only is a problem unto itself (like any form of religious militance), but it provides an environment for lootification to continue.

After 9/11, a lot of Americans support interventionism to a much greater degree than before.  It's funny to think of it now, but Bush actually campaigned in 2000 on a platform of isolationism.  The average American was reluctant to get us involved in Middle Eastern affairs, despite previous acts of terror made against us.  Yet, this reluctance was well-founded.  We should be reluctant to mess with the Middle East.

History has shown the region to be highly volatile.  Our influence isn't going to make things significantly better, and now that Iraq is so chaotic, it's pretty obvious that things have gotten worse due to our involvement.

Because of things like the Iraq War, now, it seems acceptable to intervene in Middle Eastern affairs.  The most common justification used involves the idea that if we don't get involved more 9/11's will occur.  Despite the absurdity of this notion, it's an easy sell to a paranoid public.

In effect, Osama and his cohorts serve the interests of war profiteering more than their own interests, because the fear they invoke through their insane actions is capitalized on by the military industrial complex.  They are a faceless enemy that is perfect for justifying continual war.

Less Americans would be willing to support our continued presence in Iraq if our enemies weren't so flat out crazy.

So, ultimately, extremism in the Islamic World is the main thing to blame here as a threat to America and the world as a whole because of the ease at which our governments can now manipulate us.

rawls2 wrote:

IMO, it's the EMOfication of the world. It's even worse in the girls because they are the first educators of children. Moral and social decay will bring down this world fast.

I think the whole emo thing is lame, but what's truly disturbing about your last sentence here is that Islamists take the same view.

It's the moral busybodiness of many societies (especially in the Islamic World) that cause the trouble in my opinion.  If people could learn to live together more peacefully regardless of moral opinions, we'd have less trouble.

Liberals.  They are the product of a mental disorder (liberalism) and they "know so much that isn't so".

What do I win?

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2007-07-28 14:17:38)

makingupstupidwordsification gets my vote.

Liberalism, don't care about Europe, they are too far gone. Here in America, we are rapidly loosing everything American, to liberalism political correctness and the fear of hurting someones feelings . There eager willingness to let the world dictate our foreign policy to us is baffling. Never has a group been so anxious to turn over our military and our might to the whims of the UN like today's liberals. The appeasement and apologist movement in America will be our downfall.

Last edited by lowing (2007-07-29 06:19:15)