You said "despite occasional predictability, it is a fun series to read" - thus the 'fun', as you call it, depends on plot and substance rather than grammar. And Rowling has a fair plot in the Harry Potter series - not staggeringly great, but perfectly reasonably good.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
That only proves that you can look past the grammar and see a story for what it is, if you so choose.TheDarkRaven wrote:
And actually, Shakespeare was a wonderful writer - you have to judge him in the context of his time and the development and application of the English language as it was at the time. To compare pure Shakespeare's works to modern literature by modern standards of Modern English would be rather ridiculous - and I find your implicated suggestion of this quite horrid. Shakespeare still conveys a love for English, writing and life in modern terms - it truly is something to behold, if a little bewildering at times with the vast changes in the English Language as it was to as it is now.TheDarkRaven wrote:
poor EnglishHuh.TheDarkRaven wrote:
Oh, I'm not complaining of the plotHuh.jimmanycricket wrote:
...dumned down the name for the americans
And poor English goes hand-in-hand with poor grammar - Harry Potter exemplifies this so often it's rather embarrassing to read, especially since it resides at the hallowed alter of all who wish to be popular in their new love of books. It's good that more people are reading to a great extent primarily because of it - but for many of them it's all they're truly reading, and that can't be a good thing, especially when it's so damn bad.
It doesn't prove I can look past the grammar to appreciate true self - Shakespeare wrote brilliantly well for his time and helped to form and shape some of the language we now hold so dear (at least I do). However, Rowling's efforts by Modern English standards are terrible and inexcusable for someone held in such high regard. I do not pick and choose, I base my opinions on what the authors were trying to achieve, what they could achieve and what they succeeded in - I'm sure you'd agree that Shakespeare excels in these attributes compared to Rowling who languishes in the torrid seas on mediocrity.
jimmanycricket may show some stereotyping of Americans, but I believe American publishers changed the title so it would better suit Americans - how they couldn't understand 'The Northern Lights' just as well as 'The Golden Compass', however, I'm not quite sure.
I must be off to bed now, but please feel free to PM me if you have anything else to discuss unnamednewbie13!
All the best,
Andy