Which one would you prefer based on ease of learning the software and based on how useful it can be
photoshop or quarkXpress 7.0?
photoshop or quarkXpress 7.0?
So's photoshopS.Lythberg wrote:
gimp, it's free
haxSamTheMan wrote:
So's photoshopS.Lythberg wrote:
gimp, it's free
..Zimmer wrote:
Erm, Quark Express isn't exactly used for the same things Photoshop is.
You would never use PS for the same things you use QuarkXpress for.
If you want to compare Quark to anything Adboe has made, then InDesign is probably the best bet. I am willing to bet that for Graphics design its better and more inutuitive.
Mine wasMrCookie wrote:
photoshop isnt free. or is it?
Yes. IMO Photoshop should be regulated to finish work i.e. fancy colors, distortion etc. and photo manip, as it was originally designed for. The rest should be done with software more specific to the type of work. (knowing what stuff you can download these days getting it should be no problem whatever it is)jsnipy wrote:
If you are doing printwork ... consider illustrator