Poll

How many kids should a couple be allowed to have?

Not more than 328%28% - 46
Not more than 235%35% - 57
Only 18%8% - 14
Other number (specify)26%26% - 42
Total: 159
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6839|North Carolina

clogar wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

clogar wrote:

and who is the government to deny children their lives?
On the one hand, I would suggest that the government should help make sure that children are not subjected to abuse or neglect.  On the other hand, we also shouldn't send the message that you can have as many kids as you want without financial consequences.  (In other words, the child credit tax deductions should be limited to the first 2 kids.)
there are financial consequences for families that have 3 kids. also i know a family that has 12 kids and they are some amazingly happy people, they're not rich but they aren't burdening our country (america) so why does it matter how many kids one has.
I'll put it this way.  If they end up on welfare, they do become a burden.  If they max out tax deductions by having more kids than they logically can afford, then yeah, that's a sign to me that our tax policy is sending the wrong message.

I would agree with you that we should be free to have as many kids as we want to, but again, don't make me pay for your children -- at least no more than the first 2.
HITNRUNXX
Member
+220|7144|Oklahoma City

xBlackPantherx wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

3) College isn't the only factor... but what if they want to go to a nice college?  Tough luck I guess.  It's no easy task getting into a med-school with a degree from a state school these days to be honest.  And yes, I know there are other careers outside of medicine...

4) True.  But most private colleges cost upwards of $30,000 a year (plus room and board)
3) There is not really "good and bad" colleges, persay. The best college is one that has what the individual needs/desires. So, therefor, the term "good college" is very very loose.

4) Exactly, you said you have $300,000 worth of scholarships when most really good private colleges even only cost $30,000 (according to you).

I have also been researching colleges a lot recently the last few weeks.
I agree with CC on this point... Depending on what career you plan on going into, there are good colleges and bad colleges to get degrees from. There are colleges (I would rather not get into the naming game) that I know of, where if you get a specific degree, you are basically guaranteed a good job in the field you studied for. Often before you even graduate. Plus $30K a year times just four years is $120K and that often doesn't include room and food. I went to a $30K/year school and that was 10 years ago... I can't imagine what it costs now... But I am in a job with a $100K pay range, so even if I did have student loans, I would be able to take care of them.

But again, this is an education/economic problem, not a population issue.
T.Pike
99 Problems . . .
+187|6716|Pennsyltucky

CameronPoe wrote:

Other number:
25
It's a vagina, not a clown car.

Lots of good responses otherwise.

Last edited by T.Pike (2008-01-21 20:49:08)

David.P
Banned
+649|6708

Turquoise wrote:

He means living vicariously through children...  which actually is a good point...
Close but no.

SenorToenails wrote:

David.P wrote:

Have as many as you want. It wont change the fact you're all scared of dying so you must leave a memorandum of yourself to make the pain easier.

(Especially with a knife in your neck)
What?  Try to make some sense, will ya?

Edit:  Turquoise cleared that up...  Not sure about the knife in your neck part, but whatever.
It means: You are going to die one day, You know that, And you cant prevent that, Because you are not Immortal. So you must leave something of yourself, A memory or more likely a replacement of yourself, So when you die you know you've done good by passing your genes on to another generation, It's been like that since sentient life began to split from it's self and evolve separately, And it will continue till the universe ends. And this is also the curse of existence, To be in eternal pain and cause pain to others to relieve it. Whether the pain is Hunger, Sex, or Other.

Thats why there is no point for anyone to procreate because you will just die and cause more to pain to other living beings who would cause pain to you.

And this is why i feel no need for love, compassion, or any of your so called "Good emotions" To me they dont feel good, Infact they dont feel like anything at all. But... The ones you deem negative and bad, they they feel like something to me! They feel "Pleasant" to put in a way that you would understand. Not as an insult to your intelligence, Just as an explanation to how my mind works, It may not be "Normal" Or "Happy" But i like what it is when working to my benefit. I like that it turns off most of my "useless to me emotions" Such as Happiness and Fear(To an extent) I like that it gives me pleasure from Violence towards myself inflicted by others or by myself to them.

It maybe primal or just an insanity but violence speaks to me more than any other feeling, Something which noone else can feel like i do. But i detest violence when done to those who do not deserve it, I know i am not an eternal judge who sees ,hears, and knows all! But i am smart enough to realize what you are doing is wrong, And if i can i will stop you from bringing more harm to those different or in disagreement with you.

See this is what a life of emotional, mental, psychological, and physical, abuse leads to. Some people kill themselves, Some kill others, And a few very few learn to cope and walk the delicate line between the two. I am not Normal and i know it, Nor ill i ever be normal by the modern definition.
When i say stuff related to suicide and violence most of it is untrue but you can never guess what is and what is'nt, Because they are indistinguishable from each other by a thin line walking on the border of truth and fallacy. Sometimes i dont even know if i am... Being Serious or Not Being Serious... Sometimes i dont even have a concrete personality, Not one that can be molded like Jell-O, Or one that drifts between different states of mental existence, But one that chooses a new personality trait to suit it's self for the time being, Before it starts working against me or i just get bored of it. But one thing always remains about me, Not my physical form, Or my Identity, But my pleasure from violence and acts of violence. Whatever i am i like it and hate it at the same time, Because i can never choose one or the other.


Ya guys i know i'm really really fucked up...


EDIT: See where the knife comes from Toenails?

Last edited by David.P (2008-01-21 21:17:33)

CommieChipmunk
Member
+488|7004|Portland, OR, USA

xBlackPantherx wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

stuff
1) Define near future. Plus I said the next 10-20 years if you look back.

2) What percentage of it is Ethanol, most "ethanol" fuels rarely have more than 3-5%

3) There is not really "good and bad" colleges, persay. The best college is one that has what the individual needs/desires. So, therefor, the term "good college" is very very loose.

4) Exactly, you said you have $300,000 worth of scholarships when most really good private colleges even only cost $30,000 (according to you).

I have also been researching colleges a lot recently the last few weeks.
1) As soon as we landed on the moon people started talking about colonizing it.  If you take a look at our space program as of now... it's kind of slowed down after the Colombia stuff, maybe it's starting up again? But we're still a long way off.  (Maybe I'll look back in 20 years and disagree with this but I highly doubt it).

2) Exactly.. So were still dependent on oil.

3) No, believe me, there are good colleges and there are bad colleges.  If you want to get a good job in certain fields, there are a lot of colleges that wont get you there.

4) Right, I have roughly $300,000 dollars offered (divided by 4 years) total from 7 colleges.  However, I can only use the award at the college that gave it to me.  So the highest offer so far was 24,000 per year from Tulane.. that won't even cover all of the tuition, room and board is another 10 grand.  Sure I'll get government loans and maybe some grants but that's beside the point.  College was just an example, there are so many different expenses that come with raising kids....

DrunkFace wrote:

2 kids until we find a solution to the following things.
  • Pollution
  • Clean Fresh Water
  • Food
  • Over crowding
  • Resource depletion.


Pollution: The population size does not really matter, its only the raw amount of pollution which does. If we can reduce pollution per capita the population can theoretically grow with no further effect on the environment. And I'm not just talking air pollution or carbon emissions, I'm talking all kinds of pollution.

Clean fresh water: There is plenty of water on this planet, but most is salt (sea) water and undrinkable without distillation. And most of the fresh water on the planet is trapped in ice or underground rocks inaccessible at our current time. Future technologies will probably uncover theses sources of water but currently lots of countries have a large shortage of clean drinking water which must be addressed.

Food: Many places don't have the soil for decent farming land, and those that do, see urban sprawl competing for the best land, with the farmer almost always losing. And again water comes into this as much as anything. Growing crops or herding animals takes a lot of water and without a water source there is no possibility of growth. Also growing crops grazing animals take up huge amounts of land and are subject to weather conditions. Ocean fish are being caught much faster then they can reproduce so fish as a source of food is also going to decline without better more sustainable methods. With water comes irrigation and renewed lands suitable for farming.

Over crowding: There is plenty of physical space on the earth, the only problem is everyone wants to live in the same areas. Cities are over congested and are a great source of wasted time, resources and space, due logistical problems of so many people is so small a space. A lot of the time cities are built on the coast or river, which is also the best farming land. Time spent going anywhere in traffic is a huge waste of time and pollution and reduces ones standard of living. But the overcrowding of humans is not the only factor. Deforestation, mining, urban sprawl, farming lands, pollutions have continuously encroached and destroyed the natural environment and the ecosystems of native animals, upsetting the natural chain of events.

Resource depletion: The deepest mines today go 5 km into the Earths crust, which in terms of an apple is not even breaking the skin. There are plenty of resources in the earth to sustain a much bigger population, there's is just not the technology nor the cost/profit need to extract these resources. Future technologies to remove the human element to mining should enable us to mine to much deeper depths for lower costs.
^^^^^
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6839|North Carolina

David.P wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

He means living vicariously through children...  which actually is a good point...
Close but no.

SenorToenails wrote:

David.P wrote:

Have as many as you want. It wont change the fact you're all scared of dying so you must leave a memorandum of yourself to make the pain easier.

(Especially with a knife in your neck)
What?  Try to make some sense, will ya?

Edit:  Turquoise cleared that up...  Not sure about the knife in your neck part, but whatever.
It means: You are going to die one day, You know that, And you cant prevent that, Because you are not Immortal. So you must leave something of yourself, A memory or more likely a replacement of yourself, So when you die you know you've done good by passing your genes on to another generation, It's been like that since sentient life began to split from it's self and evolve separately, And it will continue till the universe ends. And this is also the curse of existence, To be in eternal pain and cause pain to others to relieve it. Whether the pain is Hunger, Sex, or Other.

Thats why there is no point for anyone to procreate because you will just die and cause more to pain to other living beings who would cause pain to you.

And this is why i feel no need for love, compassion, or any of your so called "Good emotions" To me they dont feel good, Infact they dont feel like anything at all. But... The ones you deem negative and bad, they they feel like something to me! They feel "Pleasant" to put in a way that you would understand. Not as an insult to your intelligence, Just as an explanation to how my mind works, It may not be "Normal" Or "Happy" But i like what it is when working to my benefit. I like that it turns off most of my "useless to me emotions" Such as Happiness and Fear(To an extent) I like that it gives me pleasure from Violence towards myself inflicted by others or by myself to them.

It maybe primal or just an insanity but violence speaks to me more than any other feeling, Something which noone else can feel like i do. But i detest violence when done to those who do not deserve it, I know i am not an eternal judge who sees ,hears, and knows all! But i am smart enough to realize what you are doing is wrong, And if i can i will stop you from bringing more harm to those different or in disagreement with you.

See this is what a life of emotional, mental, psychological, and physical, abuse leads to. Some people kill themselves, Some kill others, And a few very few learn to cope and walk the delicate line between the two. I am not Normal and i know it, Nor ill i ever be normal by the modern definition.
When i say stuff related to suicide and violence most of it is untrue but you can never guess what is and what is'nt, Because they are indistinguishable from each other by a thin line walking on the border of truth and fallacy. Sometimes i dont even know if i am... Being Serious or Not Being Serious... Sometimes i dont even have a concrete personality, Not one that can be molded like Jell-O, Or one that drifts between different states of mental existence, But one that chooses a new personality trait to suit it's self for the time being, Before it starts working against me or i just get bored of it. But one thing always remains about me, Not my physical form, Or my Identity, But my pleasure from violence and acts of violence. Whatever i am i like it and hate it at the same time, Because i can never choose one or the other.


Ya guys i know i'm really really fucked up...


EDIT: See where the knife comes from Toenails?
I hereby dub thee Joker...   That movie looks so kickass by the way.
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7081

CommieChipmunk wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

Personally I think its selfish to have hordes of kids.  In this day and age we don't need to have 10 kids a couple to maintain the population.
How many people do you know who have 10 kids?  Not many, right?  Most of the projected population growth in the next 100 years is in Asia, and China is already working on its population problem.  India will have to face that reality soon enough.  Western nations are at very little risk of overpopulating themselves any time soon.

Sure, overpopulation is going to be a reality someday.  But not today and not here.
10 was an exaggeration.  But I know plenty of families here in America who have 5+ kids.  Most of my friends come from families with more than two kids.

And sure, we can put it off and wait until it becomes a problem.... but what's the point in that?

http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd30 … owncar.jpg
One of my grandmothers actually had 14 kids, my mom one of them. Oddly enough, shes my only living grandparent.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7109|Canberra, AUS
Okay.

This is why world government of any sort will not work.

Much of Europe - in fact almost all developed nations (save the US, cos of illegal immigration. That's irony) risks social stagnation in the next few decades 'cos of an aging-shrinking population. If something is not done to boost the birth rate there, there are gonna be real issues with a massively enlarged dependent population (dependent population = the portion of the population dependent on others for their socioeconomic wellbeing. Mostly children and the elderly, those who can't work basically) and Europe could fall to social disrepair.

I honestly have never seen any logic in restrictions. Look at the one-child policy. Yes, population growth has slowed a little bit but the result is you have a staggering gender imbalance (a cultural thing, in many countries - boys prefered over girls. Saying that's ignorant or stupid is ignorant or stupid in itself), and THAT could lead to social problems, especially when you have twenty million unmarried men, and think of all the crime, unemployment and general social issues that causes.

Much better is a back-to-the-basics grassroots system. Look at Kerala, India. The rest of the country has gone the simplistic limit-on-children root. Kerala, however, has implemented a socialised basic healthcare system, and look at the results. Stage 3-4 of the demographic transition, compared to Stage 2 for the rest of the country. No gender imbalance (compared to the rest of the country). Far higher quality healthcare - IMR is about 1 in a 100, and most importantly, a birth rate that is quite low for a developing nation. Sure signs of a working strategy.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
legionair
back to i-life
+336|7057|EU

Huge countries can limit the number of kids to have but for smaller ones it is only appreciable to have as much as possible I would want some 6 sons and a daughter though I know that I can not afford it But as you see in Africa its not a problem because there are children's made to work and help at farm while in Europe its because they want to have successor. Also the problem with limiting the number of children is that parents would make abort just to have a preferable one (son probably)... That means that my son would have to be a homosexual because there wouldn't be any women's left
Wallpaper
+303|6428|The pool
As many as they want.
Wallpaper
+303|6428|The pool

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

SenorToenails wrote:

How many people do you know who have 10 kids?  Not many, right?  Most of the projected population growth in the next 100 years is in Asia, and China is already working on its population problem.  India will have to face that reality soon enough.  Western nations are at very little risk of overpopulating themselves any time soon.

Sure, overpopulation is going to be a reality someday.  But not today and not here.
10 was an exaggeration.  But I know plenty of families here in America who have 5+ kids.  Most of my friends come from families with more than two kids.

And sure, we can put it off and wait until it becomes a problem.... but what's the point in that?

http://i225.photobucket.com/albums/dd30 … owncar.jpg
One of my grandmothers actually had 14 kids, my mom one of them. Oddly enough, shes my only living grandparent.
IMO overpopulation isnt a much of a problem. If everyone would SPREAD OUT a little itd be fine. Look at china: loads of people in the Beijing area and relatively no one in the large rest of China
David.P
Banned
+649|6708

Turquoise wrote:

David.P wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

He means living vicariously through children...  which actually is a good point...
Close but no.

SenorToenails wrote:


What?  Try to make some sense, will ya?

Edit:  Turquoise cleared that up...  Not sure about the knife in your neck part, but whatever.
It means: You are going to die one day, You know that, And you cant prevent that, Because you are not Immortal. So you must leave something of yourself, A memory or more likely a replacement of yourself, So when you die you know you've done good by passing your genes on to another generation, It's been like that since sentient life began to split from it's self and evolve separately, And it will continue till the universe ends. And this is also the curse of existence, To be in eternal pain and cause pain to others to relieve it. Whether the pain is Hunger, Sex, or Other.

Thats why there is no point for anyone to procreate because you will just die and cause more to pain to other living beings who would cause pain to you.

And this is why i feel no need for love, compassion, or any of your so called "Good emotions" To me they dont feel good, Infact they dont feel like anything at all. But... The ones you deem negative and bad, they they feel like something to me! They feel "Pleasant" to put in a way that you would understand. Not as an insult to your intelligence, Just as an explanation to how my mind works, It may not be "Normal" Or "Happy" But i like what it is when working to my benefit. I like that it turns off most of my "useless to me emotions" Such as Happiness and Fear(To an extent) I like that it gives me pleasure from Violence towards myself inflicted by others or by myself to them.

It maybe primal or just an insanity but violence speaks to me more than any other feeling, Something which noone else can feel like i do. But i detest violence when done to those who do not deserve it, I know i am not an eternal judge who sees ,hears, and knows all! But i am smart enough to realize what you are doing is wrong, And if i can i will stop you from bringing more harm to those different or in disagreement with you.

See this is what a life of emotional, mental, psychological, and physical, abuse leads to. Some people kill themselves, Some kill others, And a few very few learn to cope and walk the delicate line between the two. I am not Normal and i know it, Nor ill i ever be normal by the modern definition.
When i say stuff related to suicide and violence most of it is untrue but you can never guess what is and what is'nt, Because they are indistinguishable from each other by a thin line walking on the border of truth and fallacy. Sometimes i dont even know if i am... Being Serious or Not Being Serious... Sometimes i dont even have a concrete personality, Not one that can be molded like Jell-O, Or one that drifts between different states of mental existence, But one that chooses a new personality trait to suit it's self for the time being, Before it starts working against me or i just get bored of it. But one thing always remains about me, Not my physical form, Or my Identity, But my pleasure from violence and acts of violence. Whatever i am i like it and hate it at the same time, Because i can never choose one or the other.


Ya guys i know i'm really really fucked up...


EDIT: See where the knife comes from Toenails?
I hereby dub thee Joker...   That movie looks so kickass by the way.
No man this is really me. I identify myself with the joker now because it is the personality trait i've chosen to adopt. Same with sean connery(Because i liked being sneaky and a bastard to trebek on the temp forums) Same with my "Last motherfucker breathin" title, Because i was a kickass bf2 assault player and i identified myself with that song of his, Because i could take up to 6 enemies at once and live with little or no damage. But one thing always remained my penchant for violence and violent acts. It's been this way for a while now. I guess i'm like very white person out there, Nothing to call my own so i adopt from foreign(to me) objects of existence. I guess i'm no better then the wigger or chav as the brits call them, Nor the weeaboo's i hate so goddamn much.


Anyway back on topic.
Markooo*Est
Previously known as CC-Marley
+334|6582|Estonia
are we talking about china?
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|7200|UK

SenorToenails wrote:

CommieChipmunk wrote:

Personally I think its selfish to have hordes of kids.  In this day and age we don't need to have 10 kids a couple to maintain the population.
How many people do you know who have 10 kids?  Not many, right?  Most of the projected population growth in the next 100 years is in Asia, and China is already working on its population problem.  India will have to face that reality soon enough.  Western nations are at very little risk of overpopulating themselves any time soon.

Sure, overpopulation is going to be a reality someday.  But not today and not here.
So your brilliant solution is to rather than slowing down population grow, we let it grow and wait for some massive disease/food crisis to kill off billions of people? How nice of you.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6564|North Tonawanda, NY

Vilham wrote:

So your brilliant solution is to rather than slowing down population grow, we let it grow and wait for some massive disease/food crisis to kill off billions of people? How nice of you.
My 'brilliant' solution is that the problem is not my problem.  North America and Europe have very little projected population growth compared to Asia and Africa.  Call me an asshole, but let them deal with their problem. 

In short (in case you missed all of my points), I do not believe that my government has any right to limit the number of kids anyone can have.  If China or India wants to do it, then great for them.  After all, they are the ones with the overpopulation problem.
B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7275|Cologne, Germany

I have heard just recently that the ideal number of children per woman for western nations is 2,11. With that amount, we can keep our economies and social systems running, and ensure that we continue to exist as a nation.

unfortunately, the only country that is anywhere close to 2,11 in europe atm is France, with 1,9.
So, from that point of view, we could easily kick it up a notch.

Of course, from an environmental/ ressource point of view, birth rate control does make sense to some extent. But I am afraid this mostly applies to less developped countries, where birth rates are high. Then again, those countries do not use up much of the world's ressources. The developped countries are responsible for that.

I think when it comes to natural ressources and how we use them, saving and efficiency has more potential than birth rate control.
Ben0
The Last Gunslinger
+38|6808|Southampton
zero. Children annoy me. And the world would end up like it is in "children of men". Fun for all.
Snorkelfarsan
Soup Boy
+32|7040|Stockholm, Sweden
You guys have made a lot of good points, but I still think that we have to start controlling population growth in some way. Maybe not by punishing people for having more than a certain number of kids, which would be cruel. But by somekind of taxing system or something like that.
And regarding the matter of having to many old/very young people who cant work and thus need others to provide for them, that will be a porblem but I don't see how that will be an increased problem if overall population decreases. Yes, we would get a lot of old people that we have to take care of for the next 50 years maybe, but after that it will level out. We have to make sacrifices, economical and social.

The way China is handling their population is probably not the best way, and there are many cultural issues that interfere with the possibility of it working out in a "good way". But there must be other ways in which we could make it work, because we have to. And eventhough we can possibly maintain a population of 20 billion or more it will be very hard and not necessary. Why not put population growth to a halt right now? This will not solve all problems we face but at least make them easier to solve.
Icleos
Member
+101|7176

Stingray24 wrote:

Null.  Children are a gift, not a statistic.
You'll be surprised how quick that will change when the world population starts to exceed or reach the early stages of limited resources...
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6925|Northern California
I love these topics...   Makes me ponder a scripture which brings it all into focus so nicely:

O the vainness, and the frailties, and the foolishness of men! When they are learned they think they are wise, and they hearken not unto the counsel of God, for they set it aside, supposing they know of themselves, wherefore, their wisdom is foolishness and it profiteth them not. And they shall perish.

On topic, having children is a commandment.  I will have as many as my family sees fit to have and no family should be denied the blessing, right, and privilege it is to have them.  Any human denying the right of children should promptly remove them self from the gene pool.
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|7149|US
WHAT THE HELL?

So, what?  Would you just kill anyone extra?  That's real nice!
I got news for you, there is a current population decline in Western nations! So, unless you are suggesting that China and India do this, it is not even applicable.

I don't need the government DICTATING how many people can be in my family.  If I can support 5 kids in a supportive and stable environment, who are you outlaw that?

I DON'T WANT OR NEED A BIG BROTHER, NANNY STATE TO TELL ME HOW TO RAISE A FAMILY!  YOUR SUGGESTION IS INSULTING TO ANYONE WHO TAKES PERSONAL RESPONSIBLITY!
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7170|Salt Lake City

IRONCHEF wrote:

I love these topics...   Makes me ponder a scripture which brings it all into focus so nicely:

O the vainness, and the frailties, and the foolishness of men! When they are learned they think they are wise, and they hearken not unto the counsel of God, for they set it aside, supposing they know of themselves, wherefore, their wisdom is foolishness and it profiteth them not. And they shall perish.

On topic, having children is a commandment.  I will have as many as my family sees fit to have and no family should be denied the blessing, right, and privilege it is to have them.  Any human denying the right of children should promptly remove them self from the gene pool.
Then maybe when resources run scarce, those who saw fit to have as many children as they wanted (as commanded by God), should also be the first to have the resources alloted to them, reduced.
Marinejuana
local
+415|7019|Seattle
what a nazi poll. are u kidding?

gtfo of our lives, facist.

Last edited by Marinejuana (2008-01-22 09:52:28)

Snorkelfarsan
Soup Boy
+32|7040|Stockholm, Sweden

RAIMIUS wrote:

WHAT THE HELL?

So, what?  Would you just kill anyone extra?  That's real nice!
I got news for you, there is a current population decline in Western nations! So, unless you are suggesting that China and India do this, it is not even applicable.

I don't need the government DICTATING how many people can be in my family.  If I can support 5 kids in a supportive and stable environment, who are you outlaw that?

I DON'T WANT OR NEED A BIG BROTHER, NANNY STATE TO TELL ME HOW TO RAISE A FAMILY!  YOUR SUGGESTION IS INSULTING TO ANYONE WHO TAKES PERSONAL RESPONSIBLITY!
Is it a fact that western nations' population is decreasing? And I never said anything about what to do with the children born who exceed the "allowed amount".

And I am not at all saying that you as parent can not support and raise 5 kids, I am saying that the earth, the world, is having a harder time providing for us humans. And eventhough creating restrictions on how many children one can have may be cruel and possibly unfair, it is a lot better way than having a widespread epidemic or nuclear holocaust deal with decreasing the poulation. Because that will happen sooner or later if we just keep growing and growing.

This is not about having the big bad government restricting us and telling us how to live our lives, this is about us a species taking responsibility for our actions and for the earth and its inhabitants.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6564|North Tonawanda, NY

Snorkelfarsan wrote:

Is it a fact that western nations' population is decreasing? And I never said anything about what to do with the children born who exceed the "allowed amount".

And I am not at all saying that you as parent can not support and raise 5 kids, I am saying that the earth, the world, is having a harder time providing for us humans. And eventhough creating restrictions on how many children one can have may be cruel and possibly unfair, it is a lot better way than having a widespread epidemic or nuclear holocaust deal with decreasing the poulation. Because that will happen sooner or later if we just keep growing and growing.

This is not about having the big bad government restricting us and telling us how to live our lives, this is about us a species taking responsibility for our actions and for the earth and its inhabitants.
Epidemics happen.  Nuclear holocaust (why this choice?) ... well, if it's gonna happen, then it's gonna happen.

It is Asia and Africa that need to limit their breeding if there is to be such a limitation (and I don't think there should be).  Not Europe.  Not North America.  Those are not the ones that have trouble taking care of themselves.

You'll have a real tough time trying to convince all nations to enforce some breeding restriction.  To be honest, the idea of it is absolute bullshit.  Any government that attempts such to exert such control cannot possibly deny being totalitarian.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard