ig
This topic seems to have no actual posts
+1,199|7008

chittydog wrote:

mint-sauce-41 wrote:

RS4.

Better than the M3, looks nicer, better drive. Also, it handles better.

But the M3 and the RS4 would rape the Vette on handling. Duh.
not if you're a good driver
Benzin
Member
+576|6484

mint-sauce-41 wrote:

RS4.

Better than the M3, looks nicer, better drive. Also, it handles better.

But the M3 and the RS4 would rape the Vette on handling. Duh.
The base Vette that was compared in the article I posted was at a loss here in Europe. Go to the USA and the Z06 is closer to the price bracket of the new M3 and the RS4. Take a Z06 against those two cars and watch the Corvette hand them their ass.
Nappy
Apprentice
+151|6715|NSW, Australia

PBAsydney wrote:

http://www.corvettesofpeterborough.ca/i … _Vette.jpg

Corvette wins in the looks department. (C3)
eww yuk

and Z4 is ugly as shit
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6772|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Klinka-Klinko wrote:

I still love the M3!
M3 > Corvette

imo
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Benzin
Member
+576|6484
I still say any company that puts the HP in the badge (z06 does) is ballsy. Only two cars that I know do shit like that: Veyron and Corvette
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6772|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

CapnNismo wrote:

I still say any company that puts the HP in the badge (z06 does) is ballsy. Only two cars that I know do shit like that: Veyron and Corvette
Because we all know that Horsepowers are all that matters..... yeah right

Pointless bragging if you ask me tbh
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
BlackKoala
Member
+215|6811

FloppY_ wrote:

CapnNismo wrote:

I still say any company that puts the HP in the badge (z06 does) is ballsy. Only two cars that I know do shit like that: Veyron and Corvette
Because we all know that Horsepowers are all that matters..... yeah right

Pointless bragging if you ask me tbh
Then why get the BMW?  Do you want me to go get track times to disprove your BMW handling arguments, or should I just let you keep spouting off random BS.
dankassasin42o
Member
+68|7165|Reefersyde, CA
screw corvette, i use to smoke them left an right in my STi

Subaru FTW!!!
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6986|so randum

BlackKoala wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

CapnNismo wrote:

I still say any company that puts the HP in the badge (z06 does) is ballsy. Only two cars that I know do shit like that: Veyron and Corvette
Because we all know that Horsepowers are all that matters..... yeah right

Pointless bragging if you ask me tbh
Then why get the BMW?  Do you want me to go get track times to disprove your BMW handling arguments, or should I just let you keep spouting off random BS.
And how often is your average vette driver gona go on a track, and face a M3.

M3 looks nicer, is classier, and probably a hell of a lot more reliable.

But that's just my opinion. Stats rarely mean shit.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|7224|The Hague, Netherlands

FatherTed wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:


Because we all know that Horsepowers are all that matters..... yeah right

Pointless bragging if you ask me tbh
Then why get the BMW?  Do you want me to go get track times to disprove your BMW handling arguments, or should I just let you keep spouting off random BS.
And how often is your average vette driver gona go on a track, and face a M3.

M3 looks nicer, is classier, and probably a hell of a lot more reliable.

But that's just my opinion. Stats rarely mean shit.
word, why buy any of these cars because they're +-4 seconds or whatever faster on a track.... you buy these cars for the open road, for your time off or for your work-home thing.......or for all of that, this racetrack thing is rather pointless, if you wanna do that then join a racing team.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
Benzin
Member
+576|6484
A Corvette owner is statistically more likely to track his/her car versus an M3 driver.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6772|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

FatherTed wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Because we all know that Horsepowers are all that matters..... yeah right

Pointless bragging if you ask me tbh
Then why get the BMW?  Do you want me to go get track times to disprove your BMW handling arguments, or should I just let you keep spouting off random BS.
And how often is your average vette driver gona go on a track, and face a M3.

M3 looks nicer, is classier, and probably a hell of a lot more reliable.

But that's just my opinion. Stats rarely mean shit.
+ M3 has way better built quality and "feel"

(afaik)

Last edited by FloppY_ (2008-01-23 08:21:05)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6931|The Land of Scott Walker

ghettoperson wrote:

I'd get a BMW over one any day. BMW's are quality cars, one of the thing I've noticed several reviews saying about the Corvette is that they're cheap and tacky. (build quality wise)
You need to watch this then ....

Jenspm
penis
+1,716|7218|St. Andrews / Oslo

ewwwwww, fifth gear.

Top Gear with z06:


The M3:




As for lap times:
Chevrolet Corvette Z06    1.22.4
BMW M3 CSL                1.28.0
BMW M3                1.31.8


I'd go for the M3 though.

Last edited by Jenspm (2008-01-30 09:24:55)

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6831|Twyford, UK
Hm. I'm not entirely sure HOW it can have more power, a bigger engine, and still use less fuel. Maybe the 'vette is just plain lighter?

Either way, it's sexy, and sounds awesome.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6931|The Land of Scott Walker
With more power, it doesn't take as much effort to keep the car at hwy speeds.  Only 1200rpm to stay at 60mph in a Vette.
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6772|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
I still stand by my statement: M3 > Corvette
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6931|The Land of Scott Walker
That's ok, you can have the slower car if you want.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7067|SE London

Both are very nice. The Corvette is a little overly flashy for my tastes, but the M3 is a bit bland too (I just decided not a get a 3 series for precisely that reason - I got an Alfa 156 instead and am very glad I did, at least until it falls apart).

Last edited by Bertster7 (2008-01-30 12:29:57)

geNius
..!.,
+144|6928|SoCal

BlackKoala wrote:

The Z06 baseline is only what...$5k more than the C6?  Totally worth it for the extra numbers you'll get.  It'll push it to 500HP, and still get you 16/26 MPG.

And nice call comparing the BMW and Chevy.  Everyone just assumes the Vette's a POS car compared to a Beemer, but very few of them actually look at numbers, or look deeper than the manufacturer country.  The Vette is a beautiful car, but it's not going to have the Luxury that the BMW will, as they are more concerned with performance that style.  Function over Form in this case.
The LS7 is the 505hp version, and it weighs in at around $70k.

2009's LS9 is a reported 620hp supercharged 6.2L; that'll be the one to beat, but it'll be significantly more expensive.
https://srejects.com/genius/srejects.png
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6772|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

BlackKoala wrote:

Everyone just assumes the Vette's a POS car compared to a Beemer
The vette is a POS car compared to the beemer... great performance but crappy build quality and a cheap feel....
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7067|SE London

FloppY_ wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

Everyone just assumes the Vette's a POS car compared to a Beemer
The vette is a POS car compared to the beemer... great performance but crappy build quality and a cheap feel....
Have you driven both?
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6772|Denmark aka Automotive Hell

Bertster7 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

Everyone just assumes the Vette's a POS car compared to a Beemer
The vette is a POS car compared to the beemer... great performance but crappy build quality and a cheap feel....
Have you driven both?
Sigh, what do you think? I live in a country where both cost over £ 150,000.00....

But I will take german cars over US cars ANYDAY

Last edited by FloppY_ (2008-01-30 12:38:28)

­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7222|Salt Lake City

FloppY_ wrote:

BlackKoala wrote:

Everyone just assumes the Vette's a POS car compared to a Beemer
The vette is a POS car compared to the beemer... great performance but crappy build quality and a cheap feel....
You're stuck in years past.  The build quality and feel are quite good.  The interior is the only thing lagging behind Euro cars.  The car is fast off the line, fast in 0-60 times, fast 1/4 mile times, and has a top end speed previously seen only in astronomically expensive custom sports cars.  In terms of handling, this car can run the track against any factory production sports car made.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7067|SE London

FloppY_ wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

The vette is a POS car compared to the beemer... great performance but crappy build quality and a cheap feel....
Have you driven both?
Sigh, what do you think? I live in a country where both cost over £ 1.5 million....

But I will take german cars over US cars ANYDAY
Then you're just wildly generalising. I've driven an M3, it's not that special. I haven't driven a Corvette though, so I'm not really qualified to comment.

They're both very different cars though. One is a full on sports car, the other is a sports saloon - which would have more appeal to me, if only BMWs weren't so bland....

Last edited by Bertster7 (2008-01-30 12:43:28)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard