We didn't have to go to Iraq.
Ultimately it was a judgment call, a endevor of freewill. people are pissed, but...
As a penalty of missunderestimation, America will elect the most liberal senator there is. The irony is that in many ways George W. Bush has been the most liberal president we've ever had.
He has expanded entitlements, and through signing statements has increased the scope and breadth of the powers of the president. He has outspent the most liberal liberals; it's not even a close contest. He is a liberals wet dream.
Last night I tuned into Hannity and Combes, they were interviewing a herd of democrat voters all of whom were dead set against anything republican, and dead set for everything Obama. Not one person could cite anything he has accomplished in the senate. Even after all the debates the prime answer was " he's a great speaker ". It's all about payback for what the public perceives as a abject failure in Iraq ( btw, I don't think it is, it's just hard to not get discouraged with the 24/7 negative coverage ).
Let us not forget how the presidency game is played; you promise one thing, and do the exact opposite when elected.
Case in point; Clinton. The " I did not exhale " guy signed laws granting seizure rights to police for minor drug infractions. This was the era of losing your house, cars and all assets when convicted of drug dealing.
Case in point; Bush. Fiscal responsibility. What a fucking train wreck.
So, if recent history is any precedent, Obama will be elected on a peace and healthcare platform, will not be able to deliver the healthcare because the illegal aliens will not comply and he will make the case for attacking Iran, and then do it.
You heard it here first.
Ultimately it was a judgment call, a endevor of freewill. people are pissed, but...
As a penalty of missunderestimation, America will elect the most liberal senator there is. The irony is that in many ways George W. Bush has been the most liberal president we've ever had.
He has expanded entitlements, and through signing statements has increased the scope and breadth of the powers of the president. He has outspent the most liberal liberals; it's not even a close contest. He is a liberals wet dream.
Last night I tuned into Hannity and Combes, they were interviewing a herd of democrat voters all of whom were dead set against anything republican, and dead set for everything Obama. Not one person could cite anything he has accomplished in the senate. Even after all the debates the prime answer was " he's a great speaker ". It's all about payback for what the public perceives as a abject failure in Iraq ( btw, I don't think it is, it's just hard to not get discouraged with the 24/7 negative coverage ).
Let us not forget how the presidency game is played; you promise one thing, and do the exact opposite when elected.
Case in point; Clinton. The " I did not exhale " guy signed laws granting seizure rights to police for minor drug infractions. This was the era of losing your house, cars and all assets when convicted of drug dealing.
Case in point; Bush. Fiscal responsibility. What a fucking train wreck.
So, if recent history is any precedent, Obama will be elected on a peace and healthcare platform, will not be able to deliver the healthcare because the illegal aliens will not comply and he will make the case for attacking Iran, and then do it.
You heard it here first.
