I don't think he's really fussed about infringing copyright. Maybe I'm wrong like usual, but at the end of the day nobody gets arrested for copyright infringement on the internet. Millions of people do it, though I'm not going to debate about whether it's right or not.dayarath wrote:
Copyright infringement. Can get up pretty high if you ask me. Now well, if you don't want to trust him on his word do so, but I don't really see marine as the 13 year old spreading lies.jord wrote:
I don't really get what punishment he would be given... I agree with it is his choice and privilege to do so...dayarath wrote:
Well, maybe not? You do know that on something like this there is a possible punishment involved to paste it on the internets for free? I don't want to anyway, and if you pay for something it's usually your privilege to be able to be granted the information, not spread it around for free.
My mate Tony is a MP and he knows lots of inside info and has a blod but I'm not going to link you because I dun wanna.
Allright, fair enough I guess.CameronPoe wrote:
There isn't a man alive that doesn't have a bias when compared against someone else. I'm currently searching Janes for their subscription rate incidentally.
Well you can get fines for doing so, you won't get arrested but even so (sometimes they can actually sue you for doing shit like this.)Jord wrote:
I don't think he's really fussed about infringing copyright. Maybe I'm wrong like usual, but at the end of the day nobody gets arrested for copyright infringement on the internet. Millions of people do it, though I'm not going to debate about whether it's right or not.
inane little opines
Oh come on... just because a few crazies are going to infiltrate the highest levels of government and bring ruin to civilization as we know it, that doesn't mean that we can bar Muslims from critical positions. You'd be unfair to the 8 out of 10 who are good guys when you were stopping the two nutjobs from blowing up the free world. Yes my friend, the rights of those 8 are more important than the rights of the rest of the world.
there... now I'm liberal. How'd I do? Wait, I forgot to throw in... I bet there are some loony Christians in there trying to infiltrate things so they can kill everyone too... yeah... that's it... they're doing it too...
there... now I'm liberal. How'd I do? Wait, I forgot to throw in... I bet there are some loony Christians in there trying to infiltrate things so they can kill everyone too... yeah... that's it... they're doing it too...
I ain't paying over $1,000 to see this so-called story. Unfortunate. usmarine came so close to actually possibly making a decent argument but was felled at the final hurdle...
You've got to be kidding me.CameronPoe wrote:
I ain't paying over $1,000
over $1000, what the?CameronPoe wrote:
I ain't paying over $1,000 to see this so-called story. Unfortunate. usmarine came so close to actually possibly making a decent argument but was felled at the final hurdle...
that's quite the subscription there.
inane little opines
Diction.usmarine wrote:
Once the remote email server comes back up, I will show that I am a member and do have a subscription.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
For some reason I am calling bullshit - that you found info. Maybe it is your lack of comprehension and diction on this site, but I doubt you troll Jane's for informative intelligence analysis.
Dictation? You condescending little fuck. I read Janes everyday.
I have to say I am pleasently impressed and you have gained a little more respect in my view, for what it's worth.
Jord it's only like £3.76 when you convert it.jord wrote:
You've got to be kidding me.CameronPoe wrote:
I ain't paying over $1,000
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Just for Ken Ken...and friends. Sorry, no article for you. Just proof I can actually use Janes since you do not beleive me.
Gee well that's pretty clear now innit
inane little opines
Because Liberals only care about the rights of muslims, and don't care about national security. Period. Liberals will sacrifice every single human life for Muslim Rights.Dersmikner wrote:
Oh come on... just because a few crazies are going to infiltrate the highest levels of government and bring ruin to civilization as we know it, that doesn't mean that we can bar Muslims from critical positions. You'd be unfair to the 8 out of 10 who are good guys when you were stopping the two nutjobs from blowing up the free world. Yes my friend, the rights of those 8 are more important than the rights of the rest of the world.
there... now I'm liberal. How'd I do? Wait, I forgot to throw in... I bet there are some loony Christians in there trying to infiltrate things so they can kill everyone too... yeah... that's it... they're doing it too...
Can we stop this dumb ass extreme stereotyping now? This whole "Libs love terrorists, Cons want to murder every muslim" bullshit doesn't sway any debate, and invalidates anything useful the rest of the post, I mean seriously now...
Still no article though.dayarath wrote:
Gee well that's pretty clear now innit
I follow their rules Cam. I am not going to lose my subscription just for you.CameronPoe wrote:
Still no article though.dayarath wrote:
Gee well that's pretty clear now innit
What parts do you subscribe to?usmarine wrote:
I follow their rules Cam. I am not going to lose my subscription just for you.CameronPoe wrote:
Still no article though.dayarath wrote:
Gee well that's pretty clear now innit
Err?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
What parts do you subscribe to?usmarine wrote:
I follow their rules Cam. I am not going to lose my subscription just for you.CameronPoe wrote:
Still no article though.
If you subscribe to a magazine I suppose you have full access, or has this changed?
inane little opines
If you print screen it, its not going to be traceable.usmarine wrote:
I follow their rules Cam. I am not going to lose my subscription just for you.CameronPoe wrote:
Still no article though.dayarath wrote:
Gee well that's pretty clear now innit
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Well I'm sorry but I just can't believe your little tale, especially when I ask myself the question 'why would an American magazine be publishing supposedly classified British government memos and reports, complete with concrete sources?'...usmarine wrote:
I follow their rules Cam. I am not going to lose my subscription just for you.CameronPoe wrote:
Still no article though.dayarath wrote:
Gee well that's pretty clear now innit
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-12 13:09:06)
No, Jane's has subscriptions for specific areas. They range in cost, but it can get expensive.dayarath wrote:
Err?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
What parts do you subscribe to?usmarine wrote:
I follow their rules Cam. I am not going to lose my subscription just for you.
If you subscribe to a magazine I suppose you have full access, or has this changed?
Most of Transport and Aerospace. Some Intel and Security sections also.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
What parts do you subscribe to?
No this thing is like a database of defense and security-related products from what I found. It's immense.dayarath wrote:
Err?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
What parts do you subscribe to?usmarine wrote:
I follow their rules Cam. I am not going to lose my subscription just for you.
If you subscribe to a magazine I suppose you have full access, or has this changed?
Jane's is a London-based group Cam - but they provide critical analysis from around the world.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-02-12 13:12:40)
The point regarding access to this information holds nevertheless. A defence magazine would go out of business pretty sharpish if it frequently published confidential government defence information...KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Jane's is a London-based group Cam - but they provide critical analysis from around the world.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-12 13:15:07)
Even so when I google I don't see many complaints of Janes being an unreliable source for either intelligence etc, If it's so widespread, with subscription only areas even I'd say those areas would have to be pretty classy. Don't know, maybe will subscribe one day when I've got my own income but hell, they're london based anyway.
inane little opines
Not really. Ever heard of "Aviation Week"? It's referred to as "Aviation Leak" in the government.CameronPoe wrote:
The point regarding access to this information holds nevertheless. A defence magazine would go out of business pretty sharpish if it frequently published confidential government defence information...KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Jane's is a London-based group Cam - but they provide critical analysis from around the world.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
I don't know why this seems so far fetched to you guys. It ain't the first time they have tried.
"Five Al-Qaeda suspects are believed to have trained as part-time soldiers with the TA. At least one is now in custody.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has confirmed that other terror suspects have attempted to join the TA, but says they were rejected after undergoing security checks.
The connection with Britain’s Al-Qaeda network was uncovered in a series of wide-ranging investigations by MI5 and Scotland Yard’s Special Branch."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u … 495394.ece
"Five Al-Qaeda suspects are believed to have trained as part-time soldiers with the TA. At least one is now in custody.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) has confirmed that other terror suspects have attempted to join the TA, but says they were rejected after undergoing security checks.
The connection with Britain’s Al-Qaeda network was uncovered in a series of wide-ranging investigations by MI5 and Scotland Yard’s Special Branch."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/u … 495394.ece