ATG
Banned
+5,233|6957|Global Command

PureFodder wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

PureFodder wrote:


Erm, I see no beach front or children dying, hence I don't believe this is the same incident for some odd reason. I see no civllians around, so there's every reason to believe that this was fire from an empty building. Show me proof that the there was rocket fire from the beach and I'll believe that incident. Without proof'll assume there wasn't. It seems like a reasonable standpoint.

As we've seen Israelis use human shields too.
Here's the major difference, the Hamas launchers often set up and fire and disappear before any cameras arrive. Whenever the Israelis attack, its often media covered and it will be documented and explained by the Israelis themselves. So there's not exactly going to be cold hard footage of the rockets being launched. Its impossible to know where they're going to be in order to film them or take a photo jsut for proof. My neighbours car is on the drive right now, that doesn't mean it wasn't there. They wouldn't just open fire on civilians, they would have had a reason to fire on that beach.
You assume that they wouldn't just open fire on ciillians, even though they are quite clearly willing to inflict all maner of sufferng on them that prompted 100 UN resolutions. If they were firing at a rocket launcher then they must have had reason to believe there is a rocket launcher there in the first place, or why are they firing at it? Clearly if the Israelis believe that they are right, they must have the evidence that prompted them to fire in the first place. What is that evidence? Clearly from the responses so far, simply declaring that there was a rocket launcher is all the proof most people need. Hence they have the option to attack civillians, claim they were millitants or standing next to a rocket launcher and most people would go along with it. That isn't proof that there was no rocket launcher, but Israel simply declaring that there was one isn't proof that there was one either.
Bah.

The Israel haters will never accept such evidence. If it was presented the sentiment would still be " if the evil jews weren't there they wouldn't be getting rocketed. " or some similar nonsense.

Why don't you prove it was unjustified?
The Palestinians have have many chances at peace, yet always embrace war.


Too fucking bad for them.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983
lol. At the cost of everything they hold dear, including their pride, their land and their homes. If the same thing ever happens to the US remind the rest of your countrymen not to send you to do the negotiating...
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7029|132 and Bush

ATG/Cam shame.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
PureFodder
Member
+225|6713

ATG wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:


Here's the major difference, the Hamas launchers often set up and fire and disappear before any cameras arrive. Whenever the Israelis attack, its often media covered and it will be documented and explained by the Israelis themselves. So there's not exactly going to be cold hard footage of the rockets being launched. Its impossible to know where they're going to be in order to film them or take a photo jsut for proof. My neighbours car is on the drive right now, that doesn't mean it wasn't there. They wouldn't just open fire on civilians, they would have had a reason to fire on that beach.
You assume that they wouldn't just open fire on ciillians, even though they are quite clearly willing to inflict all maner of sufferng on them that prompted 100 UN resolutions. If they were firing at a rocket launcher then they must have had reason to believe there is a rocket launcher there in the first place, or why are they firing at it? Clearly if the Israelis believe that they are right, they must have the evidence that prompted them to fire in the first place. What is that evidence? Clearly from the responses so far, simply declaring that there was a rocket launcher is all the proof most people need. Hence they have the option to attack civillians, claim they were millitants or standing next to a rocket launcher and most people would go along with it. That isn't proof that there was no rocket launcher, but Israel simply declaring that there was one isn't proof that there was one either.
Bah.

The Israel haters will never accept such evidence. If it was presented the sentiment would still be " if the evil jews weren't there they wouldn't be getting rocketed. " or some similar nonsense.

Why don't you prove it was unjustified?
The Palestinians have have many chances at peace, yet always embrace war.


Too fucking bad for them.
Prove the non-existence of something? You're simply making excuses for Israel based on nothing now as all presumed excuses have gone. If someone bombed America, killed civilians and claimed it was a justified military attack you'd be asking for a damned good reason why and a massive pile of proof. If Israel does it they seem to get an automatic free pass.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6626

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Genocide?  Mass deportation?   What do you mean?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Genocide?  Mass deportation?   What do you mean?
Help the ones who want to leave move to Iran.  Then level the joint.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Kind of like what Hitler did to the Jews?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

CameronPoe wrote:

Kind of like what Hitler did to the Jews?
Yes I want them to toss women and children in ovens.  That is what I am saying.  Good read.
SenorToenails
Veritas et Scientia
+444|6558|North Tonawanda, NY

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Genocide?  Mass deportation?   What do you mean?

Bernadictus wrote:

Why doesn't the IDF role through Gaza as they did with the Lebs? Problem solved.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7029|132 and Bush

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Kind of like what Hitler did to the Jews?
I don't recall Jews lobbing Qassam missiles in the direction of Hitler.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7190

Kmarion wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Kind of like what Hitler did to the Jews?
I don't recall Jews lobbing Qassam missiles in the direction of Hitler.
no no.  It is EXACTLY the same.  Come on now.  EXACTLY.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983

Kmarion wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Kind of like what Hitler did to the Jews?
I don't recall Jews lobbing Qassam missiles in the direction of Hitler.
'Steam rolling' Arabs into non-existence is exactly the same as what Hitler did to the Jews, whatever way you play it - logically speaking. What the Jews or Arabs did is irrelevant.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-03-03 12:10:04)

Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7029|132 and Bush

CameronPoe wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Kind of like what Hitler did to the Jews?
I don't recall Jews lobbing Qassam missiles in the direction of Hitler.
'Steam rolling' Arabs into non-existence is exactly the same as what Hitler did to the Jews, whatever way you play it - logically speaking. What the Jews or Arabs did is irrelevant.
The world is not simple enough to ignore such relevant facts like consequences. If you are going to attempt to compare you need to examine the entire circumstance. You don't need to pick a side to see this.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983

Kmarion wrote:

The world is not simple enough to ignore such relevant facts like consequences. If you are going to attempt to compare you need to examine the entire circumstance. You don't need to pick a side to see this.
So you're condoning genocide and ethnic cleansing in certain circumstances?

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-03-03 12:21:54)

13rin
Member
+977|6907

CameronPoe wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

The world is not simple enough to ignore such relevant facts like consequences. If you are going to attempt to compare you need to examine the entire circumstance. You don't need to pick a side to see this.
So you're condoning genocide and ethnic cleansing in certain circumstances?
Cam, would you have a problem if Israel was wiped from the map?
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983

DBBrinson1 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

The world is not simple enough to ignore such relevant facts like consequences. If you are going to attempt to compare you need to examine the entire circumstance. You don't need to pick a side to see this.
So you're condoning genocide and ethnic cleansing in certain circumstances?
Cam, would you have a problem if Israel was wiped from the map?
I would have a problem if the inhabitants of the state of Israel were wiped out yes. Most of them aren't to blame for their Zionist forefathers giving birth to them in such an inhospitable and silly place. And as ordinary human beings just like you and I, Zionist or not, each of them has the right to live their lives to a natural death.

Edit: Just to clarify - I believe in the two-state solution. Abhorrent and unfair though the birth of Israel was, there is now a state on the ground that is home to several million people who call themselves Israeli. The most important thing now is to stop Zionists from stealing any more property that was originally Palestinian (i.e., that is deemed Palestinian under international law).

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-03-03 12:47:41)

Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7029|132 and Bush

CameronPoe wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

The world is not simple enough to ignore such relevant facts like consequences. If you are going to attempt to compare you need to examine the entire circumstance. You don't need to pick a side to see this.
So you're condoning genocide and ethnic cleansing in certain circumstances?
No, it is possible to understand something without condoning it. By pointing out the difference in the scenarios you make an assumption that I condone genocide and ethnic cleansing?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6983

Kmarion wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

The world is not simple enough to ignore such relevant facts like consequences. If you are going to attempt to compare you need to examine the entire circumstance. You don't need to pick a side to see this.
So you're condoning genocide and ethnic cleansing in certain circumstances?
No, it is possible to understand something without condoning it. By pointing out the difference in the scenarios you make an assumption that I condone genocide and ethnic cleansing?
That's fair enough. I thought for a second that you were backing up what usmarine so thoughtfully advocated...
13rin
Member
+977|6907

CameronPoe wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


So you're condoning genocide and ethnic cleansing in certain circumstances?
Cam, would you have a problem if Israel was wiped from the map?
I would have a problem if the inhabitants of the state of Israel were wiped out yes. Most of them aren't to blame for their Zionist forefathers giving birth to them in such an inhospitable and silly place. And as ordinary human beings just like you and I, Zionist or not, each of them has the right to live their lives to a natural death.

Edit: Just to clarify - I believe in the two-state solution. Abhorrent and unfair though the birth of Israel was, there is now a state on the ground that is home to several million people who call themselves Israeli. The most important thing now is to stop Zionists from stealing any more property that was originally Palestinian (i.e., that is deemed Palestinian under international law).
I had wondered about your stance there.  Thank you for the edit clarification.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
AutralianChainsaw
Member
+65|6626

usmarine wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:

I like Berns and my idea better.  Israel should just steam roll the place.
Genocide?  Mass deportation?   What do you mean?
Help the ones who want to leave move to Iran.  Then level the joint.
um ok.. so basically its pretty much the same solution i proposed..except i suggested to relocate the israelis in the US of A and leave the land to the Palestinians.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6651|Escea

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


Genocide?  Mass deportation?   What do you mean?
Help the ones who want to leave move to Iran.  Then level the joint.
um ok.. so basically its pretty much the same solution i proposed..except i suggested to relocate the israelis in the US of A and leave the land to the Palestinians.
Think about it though, if you did that, the somewhat prosperous land of an MEDC country like Israel would go immediately downhill. Then ask yourself who will the terrorist groups attacking Israel go for after that.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7009|SE London

M.O.A.B wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:

usmarine wrote:


Help the ones who want to leave move to Iran.  Then level the joint.
um ok.. so basically its pretty much the same solution i proposed..except i suggested to relocate the israelis in the US of A and leave the land to the Palestinians.
Think about it though, if you did that, the somewhat prosperous land of an MEDC country like Israel would go immediately downhill. Then ask yourself who will the terrorist groups attacking Israel go for after that.
What? Hamas?

They probably wouldn't be going after anyone. They'd be very busy trying to get the nation they've been after for almost a century sorted out.

Do you just see them all as one generic group of Middle Eastern terrorists? They do all have different agendas you know....

Bernadictus wrote:

Why doesn't the IDF role through Gaza as they did with the Lebs? Problem solved.
Are you serious?

Because the military action in Lebanon was an unmitigated disaster for Israel. Did you not pay any attention to what actually happened then?
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6651|Escea

Bertster7 wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

AutralianChainsaw wrote:


um ok.. so basically its pretty much the same solution i proposed..except i suggested to relocate the israelis in the US of A and leave the land to the Palestinians.
Think about it though, if you did that, the somewhat prosperous land of an MEDC country like Israel would go immediately downhill. Then ask yourself who will the terrorist groups attacking Israel go for after that.
What? Hamas?

They probably wouldn't be going after anyone. They'd be very busy trying to get the nation they've been after for almost a century sorted out.

Do you just see them all as one generic group of Middle Eastern terrorists? They do all have different agendas you know....
I know they have different agendas, but if Israel no longer existed, I have a feeling they'd very quickly get bored, and start lashing out with bombings in other countries.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7185|Argentina
Anyone advocating the mass killing of Palestinians or any other nation, ethnicity, Religion or any given group is an asshole. 
Hitler was a nutjob, a deluded man with crazy ideas who will be regarded in history as one of the greatest scumbags.  How can anyone advocate such a similar thing as a new Holocaust.  This world has learned nothing at all.  WW2 was useless after all.  Shame on humans.  And then you ask why I prefer my cat instead of a stranger.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard