Kurazoo
Pheasant Plucker
+440|6962|West Yorkshire, U.K
XP seems to crash on me all the time... Go with Vista, my mate has 64bit vista and its smooth as
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6731|The Twilight Zone
Awesome, my first error.
https://shrani.si/f/3S/G1/24O9hpN9/error.png
And windows update froze at 87%.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6692|Finland

lol
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
GodFather
Blademaster's bottom bitch
+387|6497|Phoenix, AZ
do it, im on Vista Ultimate x64

thats Vista, and 64 bit...

it works well for me

I couldnt even imagine switching back to XP
aimless
Member
+166|6402|Texas
Vista tends to freeze less, in my experience. If it locks up, it finds a way unfreeze itself. XP doesn't do that.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7043|Cambridge (UK)
I've been asking myself this same question recently - I can get a free copy of Vista (any version (a friend has an MSDN sub)), so have been thinking about trying it - but not sure if my PC will handle it...

Anyone had experience of Vista running on an AMD3200+, 2GB RAM with an X800XT PE AGP?

(serious answers only please)

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2008-02-29 21:00:35)

AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6430|what

2gb might not be the best with running vista on. It is a relentless ram sapping, power hungry, son of a bitch. I'd stick with XP.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lavadisk
I am a cat ¦ 3
+369|7107|Denver colorado
I was going to have to get vista but because I had to get another model laptop at the last minute I got xp

I love xp because it runs my stuff well.

see
https://i167.photobucket.com/albums/u140/Lavadisk/desktop-1.png

and TBH I didn't really mind the idea of changing to vista..  Its just really not necessary for me.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7043|Cambridge (UK)

TheAussieReaper wrote:

2gb might not be the best with running vista on. It is a relentless ram sapping, power hungry, son of a bitch. I'd stick with XP.
Well, I only need it to run - I'll be dual-booting - it doesn't need to be fast.

Actually, was that in response to me or OP?

Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2008-02-29 21:14:04)

TimmmmaaaaH
Damn, I... had something for this
+725|6717|Brisbane, Australia

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

2gb might not be the best with running vista on. It is a relentless ram sapping, power hungry, son of a bitch. I'd stick with XP.
Well, I only need it to run - I'll be dual-booting - it doesn't need to be fast.

Actually, was that in response to me or OP?
I ran Vista Ultimate 32bit with 2gb of DDR <- important to notice RAM. and 3800+x2 AMD and 8800GTS 320mb.

Ran fine, and this was months and months ago.

Then it started shitting me, HDD thrashing while in games etc. Plus iTunes just refused to work (fuck off, it is a good program, and I'm not using something else).

Back to XP. Mine looks better anyway.

https://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4076/desktopod0.jpg

One thing to note - my internet was a couple of megabits faster with Vista compared to XP.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/5e6a35c97adb20771c7b713312c0307c23a7a36a.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6731|The Twilight Zone

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

I've been asking myself this same question recently - I can get a free copy of Vista (any version (a friend has an MSDN sub)), so have been thinking about trying it - but not sure if my PC will handle it...

Anyone had experience of Vista running on an AMD3200+, 2GB RAM with an X800XT PE AGP?

(serious answers only please)
When i  first installed Vista 1 year ago my system was: 3500+, 1.5gb ram, x800pro.
My windows index score was 4 and you need at least 3 to run Aero. So it should work okay on your PC.
Bur beware of troubles...
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
De_Jappe
Triarii
+432|6805|Belgium

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

I've been asking myself this same question recently - I can get a free copy of Vista (any version (a friend has an MSDN sub)), so have been thinking about trying it - but not sure if my PC will handle it...

Anyone had experience of Vista running on an AMD3200+, 2GB RAM with an X800XT PE AGP?

(serious answers only please)
That will work if you don't plan to play high-end games on it. For browsing and chatting it's more than enough. One remark though, this will only work for a 32 bit vista version, on a 64bit vista 2GB is not optimal.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7043|Cambridge (UK)
K, thanks Reaper, Timmmmmmmmmmah, sup and de jappe...

Yes, 32bit (sorry should have specified, it's an Athlon 3200+ I've got, not a 64bitter) and no, won't be playing games or the like - I'll be keeping my optimised XP install for that.

Unfortunately it looks like my friends msdn sub may well have just run out today (I just went to the MSDN site to try downloading Vista Ultimate) and it's giving me an 'error'... :'(

anyhoo... I'll stop hijacking the thread now...
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6731|The Twilight Zone
Didn't know what the cause of my processor frequency drop to 2000 mhz was so i checked Vista's power saving options and when on "Balanced" it lowered my frequency which was initially 3000. So i've set it to high performance.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6731|The Twilight Zone
Does anyone know where is the "move" option? I want to move files not copy them and i can't seem to find this option.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6659|the land of bourbon

.Sup wrote:

Does anyone know where is the "move" option? I want to move files not copy them and i can't seem to find this option.
cut? ctl+x? if you hit alt u will see the menu bar too...
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6731|The Twilight Zone

steelie34 wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Does anyone know where is the "move" option? I want to move files not copy them and i can't seem to find this option.
cut? ctl+x? if you hit alt u will see the menu bar too...
No, i want the move option not the cut option. And if i press ALT i get a menu bar but it doesn't give me the option i want.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6430|what

Click down on the files and drag them?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6731|The Twilight Zone

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Click down on the files and drag them?
I need to open 2 windows then. I have 1 window open and from there was to move files.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
steelie34
pub hero!
+603|6659|the land of bourbon
i'm not sure i know what you mean by moving (other than cut/paste) where did you used to find this 'move' option?.... typically, if you drag and drop files from one partition to another, windows copies by default, but if they are on the same partition, it moves them.

Last edited by steelie34 (2008-03-07 16:35:08)

https://bf3s.com/sigs/36e1d9e36ae924048a933db90fb05bb247fe315e.png
FloppY_
­
+1,010|6563|Denmark aka Automotive Hell
In XP,
- hold shift + dragndrop to move from one drive to another, dragndrop to copy
- hold CTRL + dragndrop to copy to same drive, dragndrop to move
­ Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6827|CH/BR - in UK

TSI wrote:

I also read that you want to use Vista to surf the net. Bad idea, IMO. Windows Internet explorer 7 is out now, and Firefox 2 as well. They're the best, I would say. Your OS would not do too much to change that.

If there is one thing I like about Vista though, it's that USB-drive turns into RAM thing. Wish XP had that (maybe on SP3)
Firefox 2 sucks ass, get the beta. Its webstandards are far superior.

Vista is very much worth your while. It can be a bit of a resource hog, but you can turn things off if you want (such as live preview of windows etc)
Yes, it can be a resource hog, but it's worth it on systems that can handle it.

Boy, it sure is popular to hate things here, isn't it?

-konfusion

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard