Poll

How'd you feel if they built a Mosque in your negihborhood?

I'd be mad and I'd complain about it14%14% - 48
I wouldn't care tbh55%55% - 184
I think it would improve the neighborhood2%2% - 9
Fuck Islam27%27% - 91
Total: 332
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7102|Canberra, AUS
And you know this, how? Considering you still give no indication that you've even met a Muslim, let alone talked to them.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


Well, I was TRYING to show you that there ARE actually peaceful Muslims, but apparentely you just decided to overlook them.

So what? Still doesn't represent Muslim in America as a whole.
I guess ya missed the point that CAIR is the MOST influential Islamic American organization in the US and also the bigest. So why aren't we gunna discuss this group since they are in fact the MAJOR player of all these groups in the US?
So wait, because the Catholic Church is the head of Catholicism, everything bad they say and do overrules every Catholic person's beliefs just because they're the "most major player" of all the Catholic groups?

Well shit!
Yup when the Catholic Church starts to teach to kill non believers, you will not find much support from me for them. Until then however, please keep your analogies grounded.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Spark wrote:

And you know this, how? Considering you still give no indication that you've even met a Muslim, let alone talked to them.
Actually I have met a few Muslims while in Iraq, and had quite a few rather deep conversations with them about various issues concerning the war. I found their stories interesting and informative and they were as pleasant to talk to as anyone I have met in my life.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:


I guess ya missed the point that CAIR is the MOST influential Islamic American organization in the US and also the bigest. So why aren't we gunna discuss this group since they are in fact the MAJOR player of all these groups in the US?
So wait, because the Catholic Church is the head of Catholicism, everything bad they say and do overrules every Catholic person's beliefs just because they're the "most major player" of all the Catholic groups?

Well shit!
Yup when the Catholic Church starts to teach to kill non believers, you will not find much support from me for them. Until then however, please keep your analogies grounded.
Again, that's not what I'm saying.

At all.

I'm saying - the fact that you're letting a group speak for ALL muslims is very, very sad.
David.P
Banned
+649|6701

Poseidon wrote:

I'm saying - the fact that you're letting a group speak for ALL muslims is very, very sad.
Clarify this line before i point out whats wrong with it.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

David.P wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

I'm saying - the fact that you're letting a group speak for ALL muslims is very, very sad.
Clarify this line before i point out whats wrong with it.
He's letting ONE group speak for ALL muslims. I was trying to say - that's like letting the Catholic Church speak for ALL Catholics.

...Not that hard to figure out.
Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7150|Eastern PA
Confession. I speak for all Americans.

You heard it here first folks.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7102|Canberra, AUS

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:

And you know this, how? Considering you still give no indication that you've even met a Muslim, let alone talked to them.
Actually I have met a few Muslims while in Iraq, and had quite a few rather deep conversations with them about various issues concerning the war. I found their stories interesting and informative and they were as pleasant to talk to as anyone I have met in my life.
And, you regard their religion as extremist.

Oookay. Something doesn't fit here.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


So wait, because the Catholic Church is the head of Catholicism, everything bad they say and do overrules every Catholic person's beliefs just because they're the "most major player" of all the Catholic groups?

Well shit!
Yup when the Catholic Church starts to teach to kill non believers, you will not find much support from me for them. Until then however, please keep your analogies grounded.
Again, that's not what I'm saying.

At all.

I'm saying - the fact that you're letting a group speak for ALL muslims is very, very sad.
No, what is "sad" is the vast majority of Muslims are letting the extremists speak for them. This is the root of my problem with this religion in my country. As Americans if the Islamic members of our society are willing to sit back and allow this shit to happen without a fight, then to me, it is paramount as an endorsement. Hence my problem with this religion in my country.
David.P
Banned
+649|6701

Poseidon wrote:

He's letting ONE group speak for ALL muslims. I was trying to say - that's like letting the Catholic Church speak for ALL Catholics.
/Facepalm

What part of the church?  You cannot say the catholic church speaks on who's behalf if you do not specify which part of it. Do you mean catholicism as a whole?

Poseidon wrote:

...Not that hard to figure out.
I'm tired.
Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7150|Eastern PA

Masques wrote:

You don't have to search far to find muslim groups denouncing hateful imams or speaking out on violence. You won't find them on TV much because peaceable individuals trying to facilitate dialog don't rouse the rabble. Get a few unshaven goons screaming "Durka Durka, Mohammad, Jihad!" and you boost the ratings and the bottom line a little.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Spark wrote:

lowing wrote:

Spark wrote:

And you know this, how? Considering you still give no indication that you've even met a Muslim, let alone talked to them.
Actually I have met a few Muslims while in Iraq, and had quite a few rather deep conversations with them about various issues concerning the war. I found their stories interesting and informative and they were as pleasant to talk to as anyone I have met in my life.
And, you regard their religion as extremist.

Oookay. Something doesn't fit here.
Their religion goes against western values and beliefs, an individuals personal beliefs may not. I hate this religion I take individual members of this religion one at a time and form opinions about them ( like I do everyone else) based on how they influence those around them
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Yup when the Catholic Church starts to teach to kill non believers, you will not find much support from me for them. Until then however, please keep your analogies grounded.
Again, that's not what I'm saying.

At all.

I'm saying - the fact that you're letting a group speak for ALL muslims is very, very sad.
No, what is "sad" is the vast majority of Muslims are letting the extremists speak for them. This is the root of my problem with this religion in my country. As Americans if the Islamic members of our society are willing to sit back and allow this shit to happen without a fight, then to me, it is paramount as an endorsement. Hence my problem with this religion in my country.
http://www.muhajabah.com/otherscondemn.php

wat

http://www.latimes.com/news/printeditio … 2265.story

wat wat



David.P wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

He's letting ONE group speak for ALL muslims. I was trying to say - that's like letting the Catholic Church speak for ALL Catholics.
/Facepalm

What part of the church?  You cannot say the catholic church speaks on who's behalf if you do not specify which part of it. Do you mean catholicism as a whole?

Poseidon wrote:

...Not that hard to figure out.
I'm tired.
...The church as a whole. The Pope. Whatever. If he starts being a douchebag and spouting intolerant remarks, should his words be what all Catholics think? Of course not. But for Islam, that's acceptable apparentely, even when it's by people who don't have the power equivilent to the Pope.

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-03-21 21:54:31)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Masques wrote:

Masques wrote:

You don't have to search far to find muslim groups denouncing hateful imams or speaking out on violence. You won't find them on TV much because peaceable individuals trying to facilitate dialog don't rouse the rabble. Get a few unshaven goons screaming "Durka Durka, Mohammad, Jihad!" and you boost the ratings and the bottom line a little.
Not true, any Islamic leader that spoke out continuously and consistently about this issue would get air time. THe problem is there simply isn't any voice loud enough.

Here is an example:

When the cartoons were published, there was no shortage of coverage as to how the Islamic community felt about it.

When the Russian sschool kids got massacured, there was no protests or riots condemning it.

Bottomlne is when Muslims want to be heard they are heard loud and clear, it is when they have no comment they speak the loudest.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Masques wrote:

Masques wrote:

You don't have to search far to find muslim groups denouncing hateful imams or speaking out on violence. You won't find them on TV much because peaceable individuals trying to facilitate dialog don't rouse the rabble. Get a few unshaven goons screaming "Durka Durka, Mohammad, Jihad!" and you boost the ratings and the bottom line a little.
Not true, any Islamic leader that spoke out continuously and consistently about this issue would get air time. THe problem is there simply isn't any voice loud enough.
Yeah, that's because the fear-mongering types like you speak louder and get more attention.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:


Again, that's not what I'm saying.

At all.

I'm saying - the fact that you're letting a group speak for ALL muslims is very, very sad.
No, what is "sad" is the vast majority of Muslims are letting the extremists speak for them. This is the root of my problem with this religion in my country. As Americans if the Islamic members of our society are willing to sit back and allow this shit to happen without a fight, then to me, it is paramount as an endorsement. Hence my problem with this religion in my country.
http://www.muhajabah.com/otherscondemn.php

wat

http://www.latimes.com/news/printeditio … 2265.story

wat wat



David.P wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

He's letting ONE group speak for ALL muslims. I was trying to say - that's like letting the Catholic Church speak for ALL Catholics.
/Facepalm

What part of the church?  You cannot say the catholic church speaks on who's behalf if you do not specify which part of it. Do you mean catholicism as a whole?

Poseidon wrote:

...Not that hard to figure out.
I'm tired.
...The church as a whole. The Pope. Whatever. If he starts being a douchebag and spouting intolerant remarks, should his words be what all Catholics think? Of course not. But for Islam, that's acceptable apparentely, even when it's by people who don't have the power equivilent to the Pope.
the fact that I know the names of Bin Ladin, Al Sadr, al-Zarqawi, Udday, Qusay etc..... and I have never heard of these leaders is pretty much proof that they are ineffective in their messages.
David.P
Banned
+649|6701
Well of course the Catholic Church does not speak for catholicism as a whole. It only speaks for a part of it.

The biggest part is the Actions of all the peoples in it, The second is the Leaders Behaviors, And finally is the Church itself.(Not counting the Former two) It's foundation, It's creator/founder, And it's belief system.

Islam is different. Way too different to be compared in this way and still have 'favorable' results.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6965|Long Island, New York
(On the London Bombings of '05)

Some random muslim guy wrote:

Whoever is responsible for this atrocity will face the wrath of God for the crime they have committed. He who takes a single innocent life is as though he had killed all mankind (Quran 5:32). My prayers are with the victims and their families. May God ease their pain and help them cope. Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji'un.
http://www.muhajabah.com/islamicblog/ar … 010685.php

Shit, these guys are fucking insane! They're all fanatics I tell you! ALL OF THEM!
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Poseidon wrote:

lowing wrote:

Masques wrote:


Not true, any Islamic leader that spoke out continuously and consistently about this issue would get air time. THe problem is there simply isn't any voice loud enough.
Yeah, that's because the fear-mongering types like you speak louder and get more attention.
Don't think that your cherry picking of my post has gone un-noticed. Why do you not debunk the rest of it.
David.P
Banned
+649|6701

Poseidon wrote:

(On the London Bombings of '05)

Some random muslim guy wrote:

Whoever is responsible for this atrocity will face the wrath of God for the crime they have committed. He who takes a single innocent life is as though he had killed all mankind (Quran 5:32). My prayers are with the victims and their families. May God ease their pain and help them cope. Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji'un.
http://www.muhajabah.com/islamicblog/ar … 010685.php

Shit, these guys are fucking insane! They're all fanatics I tell you! ALL OF THEM!
Please dont make me dig up that BBC interview with a former muslim who left after his family celebrated 7/7.

Nvm cant find it.

Last edited by David.P (2008-03-21 22:03:51)

Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7102|Canberra, AUS
I asked this exact question in a lecture on Islam we had just this week.

"Do you feel Islam is doing enough to denounce terrorism."

She then said in no uncertain terms 'Yes. Absolutely yes.', telling me how they organized a healing and rebuilding function (in Canberra) straight after 9/11, inviting the major local religious leaders, as well as the US Ambassador. All, she said, were deeply touched.

They also invited all the major news agencies.

And none of them came.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

David.P wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

(On the London Bombings of '05)

Some random muslim guy wrote:

Whoever is responsible for this atrocity will face the wrath of God for the crime they have committed. He who takes a single innocent life is as though he had killed all mankind (Quran 5:32). My prayers are with the victims and their families. May God ease their pain and help them cope. Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji'un.
http://www.muhajabah.com/islamicblog/ar … 010685.php

Shit, these guys are fucking insane! They're all fanatics I tell you! ALL OF THEM!
Please dont make me dig up that BBC interview with a former muslim who left after his family celebrated 7/7.
What's your point? Again, that one person doesn't speak for Islam as a whole.

It's funny, I've probably felt the brunt of Islamic extremism more than a lot of people here besides people like GS, USMarine, or anyone else who lives in NYC/Washington DC/PA (I lost a family friend in the WTC, and I could smell the smoke the following morning) yet I don't hate Islam. You'd think someone who was affected by Islamic extremism directly would be the most hate-mongering of all people...but I'm not.

Perhaps it's because I'm tolerant of other people? Maybe it's because I don't generalize because of the actions of a few?
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7079|USA

Poseidon wrote:

David.P wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

(On the London Bombings of '05)


http://www.muhajabah.com/islamicblog/ar … 010685.php

Shit, these guys are fucking insane! They're all fanatics I tell you! ALL OF THEM!
Please dont make me dig up that BBC interview with a former muslim who left after his family celebrated 7/7.
What's your point? Again, that one person doesn't speak for Islam as a whole.

It's funny, I've probably felt the brunt of Islamic extremism more than a lot of people here besides people like GS, USMarine, or anyone else who lives in NYC/Washington DC/PA (I lost a family friend in the WTC, and I could smell the smoke the following morning) yet I don't hate Islam. You'd think someone who was affected by Islamic extremism directly would be the most hate-mongering of all people...but I'm not.

Perhaps it's because I'm tolerant of other people? Maybe it's because I don't generalize because of the actions of a few?
Apparently one person does not speak for the whole according to you unless he of course agrees with you. IE your Mom, or the guy talking about the London bombing
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6965|Long Island, New York

lowing wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

David.P wrote:


Please dont make me dig up that BBC interview with a former muslim who left after his family celebrated 7/7.
What's your point? Again, that one person doesn't speak for Islam as a whole.

It's funny, I've probably felt the brunt of Islamic extremism more than a lot of people here besides people like GS, USMarine, or anyone else who lives in NYC/Washington DC/PA (I lost a family friend in the WTC, and I could smell the smoke the following morning) yet I don't hate Islam. You'd think someone who was affected by Islamic extremism directly would be the most hate-mongering of all people...but I'm not.

Perhaps it's because I'm tolerant of other people? Maybe it's because I don't generalize because of the actions of a few?
Apparently one person does not speak for the whole according to you unless he of course agrees with you. IE your Mom, or the guy talking about the London bombing
...I didn't say that. You need to read my posts, lowing. It helps in discussions.

I don't think that all muslims are peaceful. I never, ever said that. I also don't think all are extremists. Those people I posted do NOT speak for Islam as a whole, they simply disprove YOUR thought that extremists speak for Islam as a whole.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7102|Canberra, AUS
It has become clear that this has become a totally circular debate.

And I can see both points. I actually share lowing's view on one point - Islam has serious problems, and is much more predisposed to fundementalism than say, Christianity is.

However, does it make it inherently evil? IMO no. Nothing is inherently evil. In my opinion Muslims are welcome to go and worship wherever they please (as long as it is in line with common sense law)

Do the actions of a few incrimininate the many? If that were true, then there wouldn't be much left to believe in.

Now, to lowing: Do you think Islam can sort itself out? Because we can't do it for them. I know that. I think you do as well.

The fact is on current trends Islam will overtake Christianity as the world's most commonly practiced religion some time this century. Trying to stop this with bombs and bullets is pointless - instead of 2 billion fairly sedate Muslims you'll have 2 billion very pissed-off Muslims.

I don't want to be fighting against a quarter of the world.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard