If you had to kill one out of this list, which one would you kill?

2008-03-26 14:13:08

#76

DesertFox-: The very model of a modern major general; +796|7112|United States of America

Terrorist, although for my path of logic to work it would have to be a successful one who has actually killed x number of people. The big decision maker for me was actually killing people so I was between terrorist and serial killer.
My manner of thinking followed this prioritized plan:
1) Terrorist
2) Serial killer
3) Rapist or molestor, as I don't really care
4) Dealer
5) Politician

Last edited by DesertFox- (2008-03-26 14:20:39)

2008-03-26 14:25:29

#77

presidentsheep: Back to the Fuhrer; +208|6388|Places 'n such

Child abuser... But death seems too nice for them

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.

2008-03-26 14:38:20

#78

mikkel: Member; +383|7028

Just casually? None. In the act? All but the politician if they fail to heed warnings.

It disturbs me how many people think that the emotional scarring of a child is worse than the murder of any individual.

2008-03-26 14:57:57

#79

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7184|Argentina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

But you as a murderer would be deserving to be a part of society because it is your job to self-police society based on your own morals?
If you kill a child abuser you are helping society, not based on your own morals, but on the modern societies morals.
Does that mean that as long as I go around killing morally wrong people I am helping society?

The definition of child abuse is so broad, even in America. Some people feel spanking a child is child abuse. Should a mother or father who does that deserve to die? Do we need to define what constitutes heinous enough child abuse?

A pedophile that sexually abuses of a child, do we need to be more specific here?

2008-03-26 15:08:17

#80

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|7008|SE London

DesertFox- wrote:
Terrorist, although for my path of logic to work it would have to be a successful one who has actually killed x number of people. The big decision maker for me was actually killing people so I was between terrorist and serial killer.
My manner of thinking followed this prioritized plan:
1) Terrorist
2) Serial killer
3) Rapist or molestor, as I don't really care
4) Dealer
5) Politician

Then you're not thinking about the right politicians. Pol Pot is a decent example of a corrupt politician. He probably killed more people than all the terrorists ever, anywhere.

2008-03-26 15:54:39

#81

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7028|132 and Bush

topal63 wrote:
Kmarion wrote:
topal63 wrote:
And male lions know that if you run off the current alpha male you've got to kill ALL THE CUBS. Else the females won't breed with you.
Damn, if that's what it takes to get some ass I'd spend my days under a tree licking myself.
Honestly if I could lick myself... well, do I need to actually expound?

Nasty doesn't even begin to describe this..lol.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-03-26 16:59:17

#82

Noobeater: Northern numpty; +194|6874|Boulder, CO

Child abuser, everyone else could be killed by their targets whilst they just prey on those they know are vulnerable and get thrills out of that vulnerability.

I'd do it in the basement with the sledgehammer, slowly.

2008-03-26 17:00:51

#83

GodFather: Blademaster's bottom bitch; +387|6647|Phoenix, AZ

I would kill the Corrupted Politician, and then pin the murder on the child abuser

Justice.

2008-03-26 17:06:01

#84

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6832|North Carolina

mikkel wrote:
Just casually? None. In the act? All but the politician if they fail to heed warnings.

It disturbs me how many people think that the emotional scarring of a child is worse than the murder of any individual.

Agreed....

2008-03-26 17:13:49

#85

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6897

I couldn't vote for 'Child abuser' as it was contrary to my membership of NAMBLA.

I went with serial killer, because they prey on people for a living.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2008-03-26 17:19:52

#86

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|7094

mikkel wrote:
It disturbs me how many people think that the emotional scarring of a child is worse than the murder of any individual.

It's a personal thing. If you are a parent, you will understand. But in general, speaking from the vigilante perspective, abuse, severely injure, or kill any of my loved ones, and that said perpetrator will suffer a long and painful death from my hands.

Last edited by Ilocano (2008-03-26 17:20:19)

2008-03-26 17:26:07

#87

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6832|North Carolina

Ilocano wrote:
mikkel wrote:
It disturbs me how many people think that the emotional scarring of a child is worse than the murder of any individual.
It's a personal thing. If you are a parent, you will understand. But in general, speaking from the vigilante perspective, abuse, severely injure, or kill any of my loved ones, and that said perpetrator will suffer a long and painful death from my hands.

Hey, I totally understand vengeance, but once the law has apprehended a child molester, they should just lock him/her up in a sanitarium with no chance of release. In most cases, they have a mental disorder that requires medication to neutralize.

Now, if the molester kills anyone, then the death penalty makes more sense. In many ways, I believe in the eye-for-an-eye approach.

2008-03-26 17:32:14

#88

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|7094

Turquoise wrote:
In many ways, I believe in the eye-for-an-eye approach.

Yup, same here... with some exceptions like castration for sexual assault or perhaps death by bongo.

2008-03-26 17:40:45

#89

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,991|7059|949

sergeriver wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
sergeriver wrote:

If you kill a child abuser you are helping society, not based on your own morals, but on the modern societies morals.
Does that mean that as long as I go around killing morally wrong people I am helping society?

The definition of child abuse is so broad, even in America. Some people feel spanking a child is child abuse. Should a mother or father who does that deserve to die? Do we need to define what constitutes heinous enough child abuse?
A pedophile that sexually abuses of a child, do we need to be more specific here?

Yes, you really did need to specify, hence the reason I asked. Even then (sexual assault on a child), nope, no murder by me.

I don't have kids, so maybe that's why I feel that way.

I understand the idea of protecting children (especially your own) or family, but I cannot come to the conclusion that I would murder someone without experiencing the emotions inherent in such an act.

2008-03-27 04:15:20

#90

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7184|Argentina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
sergeriver wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Does that mean that as long as I go around killing morally wrong people I am helping society?

The definition of child abuse is so broad, even in America. Some people feel spanking a child is child abuse. Should a mother or father who does that deserve to die? Do we need to define what constitutes heinous enough child abuse?
A pedophile that sexually abuses of a child, do we need to be more specific here?
Yes, you really did need to specify, hence the reason I asked. Even then (sexual assault on a child), nope, no murder by me.

I don't have kids, so maybe that's why I feel that way.

I understand the idea of protecting children (especially your own) or family, but I cannot come to the conclusion that I would murder someone without experiencing the emotions inherent in such an act.

I used to think the same, and then I had a kid last year, and everything changes in your life, even the way you see certain things.

2008-03-27 05:29:10

#91

fadedsteve: GOP Sympathizer; +266|6917|Menlo Park, CA

A rapist. . . .

These people dont deserve to breath the same air as normal people! They are the absolute scum of the earth! I have NEVER heard of a rapist being able to rehabilitate himself back into society. . . .

The child abuser and terrorist were tied for second place

2008-03-27 05:30:55

#92

jord: Member; +2,382|7105|The North, beyond the wall.

fadedsteve wrote:
A rapist. . . .

These people dont deserve to breath the same air as normal people! They are the absolute scum of the earth! I have NEVER heard of a rapist being able to rehabilitate himself back into society. . . .

The child abuser and terrorist were tied for second place

After Drug dealer rapist is the 2nd best one.

Raping children is worse.

2008-03-27 05:36:13

#93

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6533|eXtreme to the maX

I'm not sure if some people here appreciate the damage child abusers do.

Imagine turning a normal, healthy person into a depressed, suicidal wreck incapable of connecting with any other human being, unable to form relationships, take any pleasure from sex - probably there is plenty more - without realistic hope of a cure for the rest of their lives.
Its not the actual assaults, its the unlimited terror and the destruction of the adult-child trust implicit in every human being from birth.

I believe paedophiles carry out their activities knowing full well this is the probable result - Obviously I can't prove it.

And no, I wasn't - but I know a lot about it.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2008-03-27 05:39:31)

Fuck Israel

2008-03-27 07:02:26

#94

Ajax_the_Great1: Dropped on request; +206|7073

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Ilocano wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

But you as a murderer would be deserving to be a part of society because it is your job to self-police society based on your own morals?
But is the OP's poll based on the actions of a vigilante or end result of a court of law?
I guess I took "you" to literally mean "me"

End result of a court of law, the only one I could say unequivocally would be a serial killer - which is still unfortunate because most are products of bad childhoods.

Any others, nope, wouldn't support state-sponsored death.

Personal responsibility really is your peoples kryptonite isn't it.

2008-03-27 07:05:50

#95

mikkel: Member; +383|7028

Ilocano wrote:
mikkel wrote:
It disturbs me how many people think that the emotional scarring of a child is worse than the murder of any individual.
It's a personal thing. If you are a parent, you will understand.

Of course it's a personal thing. What else would it be?

That whole "You won't understand unless you're a parent" thing is the last refuge for the people who don't want to admit that there's no rational, objective basis for their opinion. I don't need to be a parent to understand irrationality from passion, and simply being a parent doesn't mean that you'll see child abuse as being worse than murder.

2008-03-27 07:08:51

#96

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6838|'Murka

Rationality and objectiveness do not come into play when it comes to your childrens' safety.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2008-03-27 07:14:46

#97

mikkel: Member; +383|7028

FEOS wrote:
Rationality and objectiveness do not come into play when it comes to your childrens' safety.

I don't need to be a parent to understand irrationality from passion

It's right there. Read the post.

2008-03-27 07:18:51

#98

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|7071

annoying poll makers.

2008-03-27 07:25:34

#99

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6838|'Murka

mikkel wrote:
FEOS wrote:
Rationality and objectiveness do not come into play when it comes to your childrens' safety.
I don't need to be a parent to understand irrationality from passion

It's right there. Read the post.

I did read it. You mentioned having a rational, objective basis for an opinion. That's what I was responding to. Should've been easy to figure out, as I was using your own words.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2008-03-27 07:45:35

#100

sergeriver: Cowboy from Hell; +1,928|7184|Argentina

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
annoying poll makers.

Don't read 'em.

A child abuser	36%	36% - 65
A rapist	12%	12% - 23
A corrupted politician	17%	17% - 31
A terrorist	14%	14% - 26
A drug dealer	2%	2% - 4
A serial killer	15%	15% - 28
Total: 177

BF2S Forums If you had to kill one out of this list, which one would you kill?

Poll

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

DesertFox- wrote:

topal63 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

topal63 wrote:

mikkel wrote:

mikkel wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

mikkel wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

mikkel wrote:

FEOS wrote:

mikkel wrote:

FEOS wrote:

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

Board footer