I can see what phetal's saying, in that the art is meant to be the reactions toward this, rather than the actual killing of the dog itself.djphetal wrote:
Yeah, I guess I may be the outsider here, but I, personally, find this incredibly artistic, and quite brilliant. As I said before, it's very sad, and certainly not ethical, but I find the "art" in this to be what you're seeing here.
Discussion, anger, compassion, love, violence, movement...
This guy has created an exhibit that has gained more exposure than anything like it for a while now. Whether intentional or not, he has rallied people against a common cause. And not only that, why are people so easily united against a relatively minor tragedy? It not only says something about the nature of people, it is practically a case study on the sociological impact that "cruelty" can have on a large population.
If I met the artist, I'd shake his hand, tell him I thought it was tragic but brilliant, and ask him what he thought about the reaction it was getting.
The art here is us, that petition, your friends... and how we're all reacting to this.
+1 Guillermo Vargas Habacuc. You have the world captive.
That being said, however, letting a dog starve to death is not cool.
