Pages: 1 2
Not everyone. Familys, the guy himself, but I'm being too literal.Y-D-Donut? wrote:
Right... has sence. in my opinion... to hell with that. The more dead he is, better 4 everyone.
Mosin Nagant 91/30 is a good gun. Shot it many times.AlbertWesker[RE] wrote:
You've got to be kidding me.... you've never fired a rifle before IRL have you....all the different bolt action rifles I have shot....from different .308's to .223's to my good ol 7.62x54R Mosin Nagant 91/30....the bolt has never even touched my face....I suggest you go do a little target practice, than get back to me. Maybe you don't have any experience and think that your eye is right next to the scope... its not, you do something called resting your cheek on the stock not push your eyeball into the damn scope. Once again I digress I'm not sure how experienced you are with firearms, you didn't convey that you had any experience so I won't rape you on that aspect. Just trying to give some constructive criticism.Y-D-Donut? wrote:
In real life that is not possible since the "bolt" is right under the scope, is you try to do it,, u will hit ur face.
As for the game feature in question, yeah it would make it more realistic, but hey, than there would be sniper wars right? Right...........
I've played America's Army once a long time ago, and got caught up in the terrain bugs during the "training" you went through. I suppose it's alot better now, but I'm waiting for them to adopt Unreal Tournament 2007's engine.BaD.MaGiC.N wrote:
if you want realisme go play Americas Army...nothing close to it:P
I don't know about you, but I feel more sorry for the guy with his torso blown open on a completely different level of sympathy than I have for his mother. I'm not downgrading her sense of loss, but I'd rather grieve than be in several pieces strewn about in the dust.Defiance wrote:
I know about dogtags in the shoelaces, but how would you like to be the mother of someone who's torso has been blown off by one shot?
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-02-23 02:52:43)
Going from memory I believe the Geneva Conventions (international law of war) declared the use of large caliber automatic weaponry to be cruel and inhuman when used in the anti-personnel role.Y-D-Donut? wrote:
I didn't know that. Thanks 4 the info. By the way... do you know why is this?? I know the answer might be 700 feet long, so if there is no problem, please teach me a bit more about the Rule of War.OpsChief wrote:
Doesn't the IRL M2 .50cal hit about 30-40% harder then the sniper .50? The real problem is can anyone do anything if hit by any .50 cal anywhere on their body? that is after flying a couple of feet from the shock.
OF COURSE we don't shoot at people with .50s because that violates the law of war so we are in fact shooting at their equipment.
Ive come over from AA myself, after a break from BF2 since nov, i came back yesterday. I still cant quite get to grips with it tbh.BaD.MaGiC.N wrote:
if you want realisme go play Americas Army...nothing close to it:P
Hoorah, damn right!!M60 wrote:
Mosin Nagant 91/30 is a good gun. Shot it many times.
Pages: 1 2