cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
It's only something for awsm azns.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Yes | 51% | 51% - 38 | ||||
No | 48% | 48% - 36 | ||||
Total: 74 |
cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
It's only something for awsm azns.
Oi!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Yes and it increases shit so fast. It's only something for awsm azns.
Last edited by PBAsydney (2008-04-30 04:05:02)
So I did this and max did not appear_NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
No, I find the max by putting the fan on 100%, OCing until artifacts show, clock down 10Mhz on Core and Mem and it's 24/7 stable.
Oi!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Max too.max wrote:
Oi!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Yes and it increases shit so fast. It's only something for awsm azns.
and freezer and .SupFreezer7Pro wrote:
Oi!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Max too.max wrote:
Oi!
What "little gain"?Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I've done it.
I don't like it.
Too much risk for such little gain.
There's really very little risk as long as you don't increase the voltages. I've done all kinds of stupid things to my X2 5200+, like increasing frequencies 100MHz at a time, and it still runs like a champ. Just clear CMOS, reboot, and you're good to go.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I've done it.
I don't like it.
Too much risk for such little gain.
Todays mobos are really safe when it come to OCing.SpIk3y wrote:
There's really very little risk as long as you don't increase the voltages. I've done all kinds of stupid things to my X2 5200+, like increasing frequencies 100MHz at a time, and it still runs like a champ. Just clear CMOS, reboot, and you're good to go.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I've done it.
I don't like it.
Too much risk for such little gain.
Sorry to ruin your party:GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
I pwn in OC'ing
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2008-04-30 13:32:45)
not in newer sm3 hehe ;p_NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
I still beat you.
Oi tbh.haffeysucks wrote:
and freezer and .SupFreezer7Pro wrote:
Oi!cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
Max too.
happy?
That's Vista for youGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
not in newer sm3 hehe ;p_NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
I still beat you.
tru. vista is awsome for ati._NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
That's Vista for youGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
not in newer sm3 hehe ;p_NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
I still beat you.
hehe tru. 3dmark gets horribly cpu bound when you have 3 GPU well see again when I get the successor of G200_NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
But I still beat you in an overall score
I'll PM you the funny part.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
hehe tru. 3dmark gets horribly cpu bound when you have 3 GPU well see again when I get the successor of G200_NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
But I still beat you in an overall score
CrazeD wrote:
What "little gain"?Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I've done it.
I don't like it.
Too much risk for such little gain.
Overclocking a 2.4GHz E6600 to 4GHz is hardly what I consider "little gain".
No, I don't suck ass at overclocking.
It's all relative.SpIk3y wrote:
There's really very little risk as long as you don't increase the voltages. I've done all kinds of stupid things to my X2 5200+, like increasing frequencies 100MHz at a time, and it still runs like a champ. Just clear CMOS, reboot, and you're good to go.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
I've done it.
I don't like it.
Too much risk for such little gain.