Poll

When does Clinton bow out?

Within a week12%12% - 11
May 14th (After West Virginia)5%5% - 5
May 21st (After Oregon/Kentucky)10%10% - 9
June 2nd (After Puerto Rico)1%1% - 1
June 4th (After Montana/South Dakota)13%13% - 12
Never55%55% - 48
Total: 86
Vax
Member
+42|6276|Flyover country

DBBrinson1 wrote:

I think if she loses WV she'll call it.

George Stephanopoulos wrote:

There are various exit strategies right now. Number one would be, go out on a win. So, stay in until West Virginia, where Sen. Clinton is likely the winner, and Kentucky on May 20, and after that, bow out. Two, negotiate for the imposition of Michigan and Florida, to get those delegations seated, declare victory on that, and get out. But the big one, Charlie — and this is what some people close to the Clintons are talking about: Is there a way to negotiate a settlement with Barack Obama to have Sen. Clinton on the ticket?
http://abcnews.go.com//Politics/story?i … amp;page=1

so much speculation going on

Dick Morris thinks she might hang on to undermine Obama, with an eye to running in 2012 (which would be pretty slimy IMO)


Karl Rove's take on things

Some People probably hate Rove, but he knows a few things about  political races :}

Last edited by Vax (2008-05-08 12:16:12)

13rin
Member
+977|6903

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Hillary will win, Obama will implode on his past and ideology soon.
I don't know if she will win, but there is much more to Obama's ideology than being reported.

Last edited by DBBrinson1 (2008-05-08 12:11:48)

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Hillary will win, Obama will implode on his past and ideology soon.
I don't know if she will win, but there is much more to Obama's ideology than being reported.
Dude are you living in a basement? Cmon..lol.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Another Bill eruption..In this case I think he’s on solid ground. Bill stumped for his wife in Fayetteville, West Virginia, but got interrupted at a rally by an Obama supporter, who charged that Hillary and Bill never did anything about health care.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7146|Eastern PA
Obama now in lead among super delegates (according to ABC at least):

May 09, 2008 6:19 AM

ABC News' Karen Travers Reports: For the first time this campaign season, Barack Obama has surpassed Hillary Clinton's support among superdelegates, according to the ABC News delegate estimate.

Sen. Obama, D-Ill., picked up two superdelegates this morning giving him a new metric to tout in addition to his current commanding leads in pledged delegates, popular votes, states won, and money raised.

Rep. Donald Payne, D-N.J., switched his endorsement from Clinton to Obama and Rep. Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., endorsed Obama. DeFazio was previously uncommitted.

With these endorsements, Obama has the support of 267 superdelegates and Clinton has 265 superdelegates.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Kmarion wrote:

Obama now has more delegates, more state wins, more of the popular vote, and committed Superdelegates are about even.  The rest of the superdelegates are going to get away from Clinton like she is the plague.
Fixed
Xbone Stormsurgezz
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6915|Northern California
Wow, with the superdelegate swing...i think we'll see a hillary free political front soon!  *prays obama doesn't put hillary on the ticket wishing for Wes Clark or John Edwards instead*
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Did Barack Obama send a subtle message to Hillary Clinton about the potential for her to join him on the Democratic ticket last night on CNN? The Guardian picked up on the nuance in Obama’s generous description of Hillary to Wolf Blitzer, all the way across the pond. The Obama campaign wants an end to the internecine battling and may have sent up the biggest signal yet that they’re prepared to cut a deal — or it could just be a gracious way out of a routine question:
Barack Obama yesterday gave the clearest hint yet that he may consider Hillary Clinton as his vice-presidential running mate in the November election for the White House. With the campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination close to finished as a contest, Obama began looking beyond his battles with Clinton to the one with the Republican John McCain.

    There are six more primaries left on the Democratic calendar, but Obama has established such a formidable lead that Clinton is no longer realistically capable of overtaking him, and the US media were yesterday treating him as the presumptive Democratic nominee.

    The possibility of her serving as vice-president seemed unlikely until yesterday, given the personal bitterness that has grown between the two camps in the course of the campaign. But Obama, in an interview with NBC News, refused to rule out the prospect. “There’s no doubt that she’s qualified to be vice-president; there’s no doubt she’s qualified to be president,” he said.

    In an interview with CNN , he said he had not yet wrapped up the Democratic nomination, but when he did he would start the process of selecting a running mate. “She is tireless, she is smart. She is capable. And so obviously she’d be on anybody’s shortlist to be a potential vice-presidential candidate,” he said.
Take a look at the moment for yourselves. Signal or boilerplate?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6915|Northern California
Crap...the only positive aspect of Hillary being on the ticket is that Clinton's are about the ONLY dems who know how to mudsling, destroy, and minimize the effect of an opponent..basically, the Clintons are the Karl Rove's of the Left...and alot classier than Rove.

Other than that, she'll be trying to wear the pants in the white house and flex too much muscle..and dang, what a contrast it'll be from CHeney to her if that happened.  Not pretty.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6829|North Carolina

IRONCHEF wrote:

Wow, with the superdelegate swing...i think we'll see a hillary free political front soon!  *prays obama doesn't put hillary on the ticket wishing for Wes Clark or John Edwards instead*
Richardson is the most likely to be on Obama's ticket.  One can only hope, at least....
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6915|Northern California

Turquoise wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

Wow, with the superdelegate swing...i think we'll see a hillary free political front soon!  *prays obama doesn't put hillary on the ticket wishing for Wes Clark or John Edwards instead*
Richardson is the most likely to be on Obama's ticket.  One can only hope, at least....
Ya think?  Have you seen any indicators, or are you saying it based on what Richardson can bring in?  Do you like him or something?  I'm not familiar with his platform, but I do dig the beard.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6829|North Carolina

IRONCHEF wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

IRONCHEF wrote:

Wow, with the superdelegate swing...i think we'll see a hillary free political front soon!  *prays obama doesn't put hillary on the ticket wishing for Wes Clark or John Edwards instead*
Richardson is the most likely to be on Obama's ticket.  One can only hope, at least....
Ya think?  Have you seen any indicators, or are you saying it based on what Richardson can bring in?  Do you like him or something?  I'm not familiar with his platform, but I do dig the beard.
Richardson is very popular and very experienced.  He's one of the most experienced diplomats who's politically active right now.  The thing is...  between his moderate image, likability, and his pull with the Hispanic vote, he's pretty valuable as a running mate.  I like him, even though I disagree with some of his stances.

Richardson has the potential to help Obama win Florida, which is almost imperative for Obama to win the election overall.  If he doesn't get Florida, he'll have to get Ohio.
IRONCHEF
Member
+385|6915|Northern California
But in general, who the hell is Richardson to the average voter?  He bombed in the early campaigning from what I saw.  I didn't mind him too much but I don't think his name or appeal as you put it would be as valuable a ticket (and FA win) as Clinton or Edwards.  THose two have large pull in places OBama doesn't have..or so I've seen.

Anyway, I'm just glad Obama will be beating McCain rather than her.  I can actually vote now!
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6829|North Carolina

IRONCHEF wrote:

But in general, who the hell is Richardson to the average voter?  He bombed in the early campaigning from what I saw.  I didn't mind him too much but I don't think his name or appeal as you put it would be as valuable a ticket (and FA win) as Clinton or Edwards.  THose two have large pull in places OBama doesn't have..or so I've seen.

Anyway, I'm just glad Obama will be beating McCain rather than her.  I can actually vote now!
I like Edwards a lot.  He's closer to what I stand for than the other Democrats.  However...  He has a huge skeleton in his closet.  Doctors hate him for the lawsuits he's been part of.  I have a close friend who's a doctor, and despite being a lot more liberal than I am, she hates Edwards.  She's not alone either....   Edwards would hurt Obama more than help him.

Clinton would hurt him more than anyone else though.

I do like Clark, but I've yet to see any indication that he wants to go back into politics.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Turquoise wrote:

Richardson has the potential to help Obama win Florida, which is almost imperative for Obama to win the election overall.  If he doesn't get Florida, he'll have to get Ohio.
Democrtic Floridians are pissed ATM..They might go McCain out of spite. Disenfranchisement leaves a bad taste in your mouth (If you'll pardon the expression)
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6829|North Carolina

Kmarion wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Richardson has the potential to help Obama win Florida, which is almost imperative for Obama to win the election overall.  If he doesn't get Florida, he'll have to get Ohio.
Democrtic Floridians are pissed ATM..They might go McCain out of spite. Disenfranchisement leaves a bad taste in your mouth (If you'll pardon the expression)
I can't blame them.  Michigan might even do the same.  The DNC is idiotic for not letting them have their way, because, rules be damned, you practically have to win Florida to win the election.  Michigan obviously helps as well.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Obama wasn't even on the ticket in the MI primary.. How messed up is that?.. He just shows up in the general..lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7114|Tampa Bay Florida

Kmarion wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Richardson has the potential to help Obama win Florida, which is almost imperative for Obama to win the election overall.  If he doesn't get Florida, he'll have to get Ohio.
Democrtic Floridians are pissed ATM..They might go McCain out of spite. Disenfranchisement leaves a bad taste in your mouth (If you'll pardon the expression)
Unless of course you voted for Obama... then it doesnt matter, lol.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Spearhead wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Richardson has the potential to help Obama win Florida, which is almost imperative for Obama to win the election overall.  If he doesn't get Florida, he'll have to get Ohio.
Democrtic Floridians are pissed ATM..They might go McCain out of spite. Disenfranchisement leaves a bad taste in your mouth (If you'll pardon the expression)
Unless of course you voted for Obama... then it doesnt matter, lol.
Florida is closed.. I'm registered REP. That is also funked up..lol.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6946|...

Your answer is in here ...
Masques
Black Panzer Party
+184|7146|Eastern PA
IT just gets worse for Clinton:

Here is a round-up of what has been a series really bad bits of news for Hillary Clinton's campaign today:

    * Obama will never fall behind in any overall delegate count, every again. Obama will be ahead of Clinton is delegates even if Florida is seated as is, and even if Obama gets zero delegates from Michigan, and even if Obama dails to net anymore superdelegates. Polling conducted before Indiana and North Carolina projected Clinton to net 31 pledged delegates from the remaining six contests. However, Democratic Convention Watch projects Obama ahead by 37.5 delegates even if Florida is seated based on January 29thth results, and even if Obama receives zero delegates from Michigan. In other words, there is no conceivable delegate count under which Clinton will ever be ahead, ever again.

    * Of course the above situation, where Obama can't lose, assume that Obama will not net anymore superdelegates. In truth, he is netting htem at a rapid pace. Obama takes superdelegate lead according to ABC News, and only trails by 6.5 according to Democratic Concention Watch. However, throw in the Pelosi Club superdelegates, and Obama leads on DCW, too.

    * Of course, that above situation, where Obama can't lose, assumes Edwards delegates will stay neutral. However, John Edwards admits that he voted for Obama.

    * Of course, that above situation, where Obama can't lose, assumes that polls won't get any worse for Clinton. However, Obama is surging in the Rasmussen tracking poll to the point where Rasmussen announced it will discontinue the tracking poll.

    * Of course, that above situation, where can't lose, assumes that Obama will receive zero delegates from Michigan. However, the entire leadership of the Michigan Democratic Party now supports giving Obama 59 delegates from Michigan.
-101-InvaderZim
Member
+42|7268|Waikato, Aotearoa
It IS starting to get embarrassing. For crying in a bucket Hillary, quit it. Your not gonna win, bow out with what ever dignity u have left, and let Barak get on with starting his Presidential Campaign. If this goes on for too long, then the Democrats are gonna lose cos not enough time was given in preparation for said campaign.
The Republicans have it right so far. John McCain? has been nominated and Im pretty sure that the Republican's Race has to the White House has already started.
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6974|CH/BR - in UK

I'm for now or never.
So never...

Come on, why won't she just leave...

-konfusion
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7025|132 and Bush

Turquoise wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Richardson has the potential to help Obama win Florida, which is almost imperative for Obama to win the election overall.  If he doesn't get Florida, he'll have to get Ohio.
Democrtic Floridians are pissed ATM..They might go McCain out of spite. Disenfranchisement leaves a bad taste in your mouth (If you'll pardon the expression)
I can't blame them.  Michigan might even do the same.  The DNC is idiotic for not letting them have their way, because, rules be damned, you practically have to win Florida to win the election.  Michigan obviously helps as well.
Must not matter too much. I just heard Fl turned "blue" this w/e (wow). More registered Dems? Who would have ever thunk that?
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/may/10 … democrats/
I don't know about "deathblow" to the GOP. We do in fact have a REP governor.


oh shit it's on
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7140

IRONCHEF wrote:

the Clintons are the Karl Rove's of the Left...and alot classier than Rove.
that's hilarious to call the Clinton's classy... lol...  Hillary will probably bow out after her win in W.Va...
Love is the answer

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard