Poll

You gonna stick to it?

Yes84%84% - 205
No15%15% - 39
Total: 244
kptk92
u
+972|6829|tc_london

Sgt.Davi wrote:

Why did the anti spam thread become a thread full of spam posts by one particualr user?
Who is the one particular user?
Sgt.Davi
Touches Himself At Night.
+300|7064|England
*takes back*


You giez all had the same avatar and it put me off. I thought it was all Finny O_O

PREJUDICE BLINDS ME!
Funky_Finny
Banned
+456|6553|Carnoustie, Scotland

Sgt.Davi wrote:

*takes back*


You giez all had the same avatar and it put me off. I thought it was all Finny O_O

PREJUDICE BLINDS ME!
Lawl. I think Kyle beats my sig, but I did only take 5 mins before dinner for it so meh.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6921|so randum

Funky_Finny wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

*takes back*


You giez all had the same avatar and it put me off. I thought it was all Finny O_O

PREJUDICE BLINDS ME!
Lawl. I think Kyle beats my sig, but I did only take 5 mins before dinner for it so meh.
Yeahhh.. i went for kyles sig over yours
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
JakAttaK
csanva<3
+492|6746|England

FatherTed wrote:

Funky_Finny wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

*takes back*


You giez all had the same avatar and it put me off. I thought it was all Finny O_O

PREJUDICE BLINDS ME!
Lawl. I think Kyle beats my sig, but I did only take 5 mins before dinner for it so meh.
Yeahhh.. i went for kyles sig over yours
Kyle's sig is good. Finny's isn't that bad either to be honest. They both get the point across imo. Finny could you post the code for the avatar please
EDIT- If you already have, could someone link me to it please?

Last edited by ShadowsStrike (2008-06-10 14:49:11)

FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6921|so randum

ShadowsStrike wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Funky_Finny wrote:


Lawl. I think Kyle beats my sig, but I did only take 5 mins before dinner for it so meh.
Yeahhh.. i went for kyles sig over yours
Kyle's sig is good. Finny's isn't that bad either to be honest. They both get the point across imo. Finny could you post the code for the avatar please
EDIT- If you already have, could someone link me to it please?
http://img169.imageshack.us/img169/571/sigcf6.gif

tada
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
kylef
Gone
+1,352|6914|N. Ireland
Sorry FF. I had this page open many hours ago, saw a post talking about signatures and decided I'd have a crack at one. By the time I was done, you had a signature already up with many members using it! Besides, it gave me a useful chance to work on basic animation - because I just can't do that, heh. I like your contrasting colours, mind you ...
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6921|so randum

kylef wrote:

Sorry FF. I had this page open many hours ago, saw a post talking about signatures and decided I'd have a crack at one. By the time I was done, you had a signature already up with many members using it! Besides, it gave me a useful chance to work on basic animation - because I just can't do that, heh. I like your contrasting colours, mind you ...
Both equally effective tbh, i just like shiny moving things haha. It's good this has taken off - it serves as a constant reminder throughout the forum.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
JakAttaK
csanva<3
+492|6746|England

FatherTed wrote:

kylef wrote:

Sorry FF. I had this page open many hours ago, saw a post talking about signatures and decided I'd have a crack at one. By the time I was done, you had a signature already up with many members using it! Besides, it gave me a useful chance to work on basic animation - because I just can't do that, heh. I like your contrasting colours, mind you ...
Both equally effective tbh, i just like shiny moving things haha. It's good this has taken off - it serves as a constant reminder throughout the forum.
This is why I like it. If enough people start using them, the quicker the message will get across.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7264|Alberta, Canada

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Ryan wrote:

Ryan wrote:

We should have separate moderators for separate sections perhaps?
Yes, no?
Yea, I quoted myself
The idea so far is that anyone trusted to moderate a certain aspect to the site should be trusted enough to moderate any aspect to the site. That said, with things shifting around a bit and the important addition of groups, that may change some. For example if the tech team and the graphics team are by invite/application only, maybe they would have additional privileges in their respective forums. Perhaps there will be a new round of mods appointed as well when we go to trackr, that would also make sense.
Yea, makes sense. But maybe if there are mods for specific forums, the rules would be more strict, and more well kept.
It's easier to control a few people in one forum moderated by one person, than an entire forum moderated by say 10 or so.

But that also depends on the size of the forum itself.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7186|Cambridge (UK)

FatherTed wrote:

Funky_Finny wrote:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

*takes back*


You giez all had the same avatar and it put me off. I thought it was all Finny O_O

PREJUDICE BLINDS ME!
Lawl. I think Kyle beats my sig, but I did only take 5 mins before dinner for it so meh.
Yeahhh.. i went for kyles sig over yours
Mine's the best.
Doctor Strangelove
Real Battlefield Veterinarian.
+1,758|6889
Well DST is returning, and DST is even worse than EE. While it does have less spam it has something much worse that EE does have, personal attacks and flaming

Exibit A

Exibit B

Exibit C

As bad as spam is, it's not the worst thing to be on a forum. Flaming/Personal attacks might be. EE has minimum Flaming and allot of spam. DST has much Flaming and a good amount of spam itself.

So why is EE gone but not DST?
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6921|so randum

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Well DST is returning, and DST is even worse than EE. While it does have less spam it has something much worse that EE does have, personal attacks and flaming

Exibit A

Exibit B

Exibit C

As bad as spam is, it's not the worst thing to be on a forum. Flaming/Personal attacks might be. EE has minimum Flaming and allot of spam. DST has much Flaming and a good amount of spam itself.

So why is EE gone but not DST?
I know what you mean, and it's equally crap.

But there's nothing to be achieved by shifting the focus elsewhere.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
i g
Banned
+876|6285|GA

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Well DST is returning, and DST is even worse than EE. While it does have less spam it has something much worse that EE does have, personal attacks and flaming

Exibit A

Exibit B

Exibit C

As bad as spam is, it's not the worst thing to be on a forum. Flaming/Personal attacks might be. EE has minimum Flaming and allot of spam. DST has much Flaming and a good amount of spam itself.

So why is EE gone but not DST?
give this man a gold medal
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7186|Cambridge (UK)

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

Well DST is returning, and DST is even worse than EE. While it does have less spam it has something much worse that EE does have, personal attacks and flaming

Exibit A

Exibit B

Exibit C

As bad as spam is, it's not the worst thing to be on a forum. Flaming/Personal attacks might be. EE has minimum Flaming and allot of spam. DST has much Flaming and a good amount of spam itself.

So why is EE gone but not DST?
I'm not familiar with the 2nd two of your exhibits, so I'll only comment on the first:

So far, that's not flaming.

Occasionally someone crosses the line in DaST, but not often - it is Debate and Serious Talk - Debate is, by it's nature understood, by it's participants, to be combative, and serious talk can sometimes get heated.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7264|Alberta, Canada

Searched around and found this, don't know if it's worth the read or not:

Guide to Combatting Comment Spam
It's a long read, but I'm sure there are some interesting points in there.

Last edited by Ryan (2008-06-10 16:31:56)

GravyDan
Back from the Grave(y)
+768|6353|CA
I can not comply.  Take away my spam, trolling and personal attacks and what do I have left?

Nice try Pinko.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6921|so randum

GravyDan wrote:

I can not comply.  Take away my spam, trolling and personal attacks and what do I have left?

Nice try Pinko.
Well, at least you're decided. Have fun after BF2s closes, wherever you end up.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Phatmatt
Vroom Vroom
+298|6610|Canada

Never actually spammed that much tbh, but I admit that I did sometimes.

I was invited to trackr and it's beautiful, but is sadly only missing the "Everything Else" section. And that is because some of you can't stop being dickheads all the time. I'm telling you now, you're going to regret if you don't change now. Everyone is gonna pay.


Edit: oh and welcome back ig

Last edited by Phatmatt (2008-06-10 17:19:58)

mikkel
Member
+383|7022

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

This is not the military. All of us should not suffer from the actions of few. And especially this drastically.

All, and I mean ALL gaming sites that I go to have an off topic section. They would simply be boring if all they talked about were games. People would slowly leave trackr. We are a community. If we can't talk about things happening in our life and whatnot and current non-serious events in the world, it will simply be a boring site to go on
Says you, who has zero influence over the site. Chuy makes the rules, and so help me if you tards can't keep it together enough to let us have a less serious section I will hunt every one of you down.
I think you're misunderstanding the point of a community. A community isn't formed because you have something that people need. A community is formed from like-minded people sharing a common interest. That's why BF2S is a community, and not just a statistics site. If you want a community, you need to listen to the people who actually make the community. That's not just Chuy, it's definitely not just you, or just the mod group. It's everyone, and the vast majority of this "everyone" consists of the users who you're talking to in that condescending tone. We all have an influence over the site, as it exists solely because of our participation.

Conversely, as a moderator, you need to respect the users, because your "status" exists because of them, and it definitely doesn't elevate you to a point where you can allow yourself to talk condescendingly to other people. On the contrary, you need to be an example as a moderator - not just another "tard", as you put it.

Honestly, you complain about people acting like idiots, but you're letting yourself slip in the process. Check yourself before you check others.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You are killing my BF2S. I love this site, I throughly enjoy the information, the laughs, and the wonderful time wasting ability it has, and you guys are taking that away from me. It's not fair, but there isn't very much I as an individual can do about it anymore, so instead I'll whine to you about how unfair it is.
Amusingly, you could replace your name in the quotation with those of the majority of Everything Else regulars, and it'd reflect their sentiments exactly. It's a community, Flaming. It'd do you good as a moderator to listen to the majority of the community, rather than shut them off and ignore the people who make you a moderator.
mikkel
Member
+383|7022
Listen, Flaming. I read the thread, and didn't get a satisfying answer to the question I posted. If I did, I wouldn't have posted my question. I only just commented that I find your condescending demeanor and offensive insults to be very unfitting for a moderator, and then you go right ahead and make this kind of arrogant and condescending assumption instead of just replying to my comments.

Last edited by mikkel (2008-06-10 19:25:23)

GR34
Member
+215|6966|ALBERTA> CANADA
I will as long as on trackr we get a " Rate the Girl above you" thread
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6989|Mountains of NC

GR34 wrote:

I will as long as on trackr we get a " Rate the Girl above you" thread
I'm not sure if that will be there



which means I'm out of job
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7127|67.222.138.85

mikkel wrote:

I think you're misunderstanding the point of a community. A community isn't formed because you have something that people need. A community is formed from like-minded people sharing a common interest. That's why BF2S is a community, and not just a statistics site. If you want a community, you need to listen to the people who actually make the community. That's not just Chuy, it's definitely not just you, or just the mod group. It's everyone, and the vast majority of this "everyone" consists of the users who you're talking to in that condescending tone. We all have an influence over the site, as it exists solely because of our participation.
As I said before this community is led by one person. One. Ein. Uno. He has made every important decision, listened to who he felt needed to be listened to and ignored who he thought should have been ignored, and he has taken us this far. You, me, community members, mods, anyone who thinks they have control over this site but chuy is out of their mind.

Examples of times when chuy did what he thought should be done and ignored protest:

  • adding karma
  • removing negative karma
  • changing permanent ban policies
  • forcing approval for registration
  • changing the name of JD
  • changing sig limitations x2


just to name a few. I certainly haven't agreed with all these, and the majority of people have probably disagreed with most of them. However he stuck with it, and it has turned out just fine with very little vocal protest on any of these points. You may help make up the community, but you do not own the community. chuy does.

mikkel wrote:

Conversely, as a moderator, you need to respect the users, because your "status" exists because of them, and it definitely doesn't elevate you to a point where you can allow yourself to talk condescendingly to other people. On the contrary, you need to be an example as a moderator - not just another "tard", as you put it.
The position comes straight from chuy. He's the only one that can grant it, he's the only one who can take it away. (if you discount profile suicide)

I do not think this gives me any right at all to treat people like crap. You're right, if anything, I should be setting an example, and I strive to in moderating and admining the game servers. I hold myself to what I believe is the highest moral standard. I don't react with moderator action to anyone speaking against me, I don't take bans lightly, I talk through my warns and bans with anyone who has a problem with them.

However, that does not mean I can no longer voice my opinion. I have just as much of a right to discuss my opinions here as you do, so long as we are both within the rules. When people come in and start talking about how unfair it is that a whole bunch of people are being punished for the actions of a few spammers, especially when they aren't exactly an angel themselves, it makes me mad. It makes me mad that so many are complaining about how unfair it is when other administrators and I have spent hours cleaning up the crap people post in this section, discussing the fate of the spammers, and working to keep the section so that we and others can have fun with it. When people tell me how to do my job, or hold my position against me in an argument but don't feel strongly enough about it to submit a complaint, it makes me mad. It makes me mad when I drop hints about what the impending consequences will be or shove them in someone's face, and people still won't listen to what I am quite sure is the best course of action to keep the section.

mikkel wrote:

Honestly, you complain about people acting like idiots, but you're letting yourself slip in the process. Check yourself before you check others.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You are killing my BF2S. I love this site, I throughly enjoy the information, the laughs, and the wonderful time wasting ability it has, and you guys are taking that away from me. It's not fair, but there isn't very much I as an individual can do about it anymore, so instead I'll whine to you about how unfair it is.
Amusingly, you could replace your name in the quotation with those of the majority of Everything Else regulars, and it'd reflect their sentiments exactly. It's a community, Flaming. It'd do you good as a moderator to listen to the majority of the community, rather than shut them off and ignore the people who make you a moderator.
It would reflect their sentiments, because they don't understand the process no matter how many times I post it. They did it to themselves. The mods have done everything possible to keep spam in check, but chuy does not feel it is at acceptable levels. Most of the people that are trying to make logical arguments for keeping EE are the ones that it never would have been in danger in the first place without, because they're the spammers that put us in this position.

If EE was without spammers, it would be safe. If EE had zero moderation, it would have been gone six months ago.

Again, the community does not make me a moderator. The only things I listen to when making decisions concerning this site are what chuy has directed and my own moral compass. Doing the popular thing isn't what the site needs. If I did the popular thing, more spammers than I can count on two hands would never have been banned and wouldn't have reformed, I would have showed everyone their post count, and I would have gone rogue and banned Orangehound and Bernadictus a long time ago.

As a side note, if you feel I have acted inappropriately, feel free to pm me about it so I can either talk with you about it or so I can post it in the moderator section for review. If you don't feel comfortable coming to me about it, go to another mod.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard