lowing wrote:
then there is no reason to believe that ANYTHING he left behind would NOT be read, now is there? So there really shouldn't be any shock that it has.
I don't know how many times you have to read this til it sinks in Lowing. But here:
The article YOU posted said that it was taboo for the prayers to be read. The article YOU posted said that the Rabbi considered it an outrage that it was published. The article YOU posted also said that it is forbidden to read them or make use of them.
Do you think, therefore, that Obama could have also believed that what he wrote was private?
The only evidence you claim to have, pointing to this as some Democratic plot, is the message he wrote was, what, too nice?