Or I get banned.Sydney wrote:
Pics or it didn't happen.Ryan wrote:
You guys ever see the nude Misty hentai floating around? Hawt.
10/10Ryan wrote:
Or I get banned.Sydney wrote:
Pics or it didn't happen.Ryan wrote:
You guys ever see the nude Misty hentai floating around? Hawt.
Oh god Misty porn is older then the internet its self! Mew rape for the win!
pics? I want proof. And no PMing me either Mr. DDavid.P wrote:
Oh god Misty porn is older then the internet its self! Mew rape for the win!
Comeback where? Pokemon diamond has been on the front page of Gamefaqs top 10 games since it came out... It's never stopped being popularRyan wrote:
I like all these Pokemon threads, it's making quite a comeback
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Google it.Ryan wrote:
pics? I want proof. And no PMing me either Mr. DDavid.P wrote:
Oh god Misty porn is older then the internet its self! Mew rape for the win!
Nothx.David.P wrote:
Google it.Ryan wrote:
pics? I want proof. And no PMing me either Mr. DDavid.P wrote:
Oh god Misty porn is older then the internet its self! Mew rape for the win!
only red blue yellow and gold silver crystal were good. the rest are like retarded. fire red was like meh... not as good as silver was to me.Mutantsteak wrote:
Comeback where? Pokemon diamond has been on the front page of Gamefaqs top 10 games since it came out... It's never stopped being popularRyan wrote:
I like all these Pokemon threads, it's making quite a comeback
Your opinion is meaningless, Pokemon games are as popular as ever. It never dropped in popularityoldgoat wrote:
only red blue yellow and gold silver crystal were good. the rest are like retarded. fire red was like meh... not as good as silver was to me.Mutantsteak wrote:
Comeback where? Pokemon diamond has been on the front page of Gamefaqs top 10 games since it came out... It's never stopped being popularRyan wrote:
I like all these Pokemon threads, it's making quite a comeback
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
True, but the quality of the succeeding games did drop. The last game I played was ruby on my sis's DS. God damn did it suck. Red=Blue=Silver>Everything else.Mutantsteak wrote:
Your opinion is meaningless, Pokemon games are as popular as ever. It never dropped in popularityoldgoat wrote:
only red blue yellow and gold silver crystal were good. the rest are like retarded. fire red was like meh... not as good as silver was to me.Mutantsteak wrote:
Comeback where? Pokemon diamond has been on the front page of Gamefaqs top 10 games since it came out... It's never stopped being popular
What do you mean quality, explainDavid.P wrote:
True, but the quality of the succeeding games did drop. The last game I played was ruby on my sis's DS. God damn did it suck. Red=Blue=Silver>Everything else.Mutantsteak wrote:
Your opinion is meaningless, Pokemon games are as popular as ever. It never dropped in popularityoldgoat wrote:
only red blue yellow and gold silver crystal were good. the rest are like retarded. fire red was like meh... not as good as silver was to me.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Well from what I remember. Story and gameplay were 'expanded' but not improved. The Pokemon themselves starting being repeats of 2 or more of the previous 2 generations pokemon mixed together. The whole "Rival chooses pokemon type that is your type's worst enemy," "beginning in a backwater town," and "Fire, Plant, Water as starter pokemon" got old.(Maybe we could begin with maybe I dunno Electric, Rock, Water? Or Dragon, Psychic, Steel? to break the whole Pokemon type1> Pokemon type2> Pokemon type3>Pokemon type1 triangle.) The pokemon started having more and more ridiculous names. And really. The game started repeating its self in the most little of ways.(One city with a huge store that has everything, except a special item which one out of the way village only carries) Honestly the last good pokemon game was Silver for me. If they took what Made Silver, Red, and Blue awesome. Squished it all in one game. Removed the cliches and "Colorful trainers" Infact if they just made it more darker and "realistic"(And i use that term loosely) Then we would have real pokemon game worthy of being called great.Mutantsteak wrote:
What do you mean quality, explainDavid.P wrote:
True, but the quality of the succeeding games did drop. The last game I played was ruby on my sis's DS. God damn did it suck. Red=Blue=Silver>Everything else.Mutantsteak wrote:
Your opinion is meaningless, Pokemon games are as popular as ever. It never dropped in popularity
I could go on but I have work tomorrow.
Last edited by David.P (2008-08-21 21:57:13)
You should call in sickDavid.P wrote:
Well from what I remember. Story and gameplay were 'expanded' but not improved. The Pokemon themselves starting being repeats of 2 or more of the previous 2 generations pokemon mixed together. The whole "Rival chooses pokemon type that is your type's worst enemy," "beginning in a backwater town," and "Fire, Plant, Water as starter pokemon" got old.(Maybe we could begin with maybe I dunno Electric, Rock, Water? Or Dragon, Psychic, Steel? to break the whole Pokemon type1> Pokemon type2> Pokemon type3>Pokemon type1 triangle.) The pokemon started having more and more ridiculous names. And really. The game started repeating its self in the most little of ways.(One city with a huge store that has everything, except a special item which one out of the way village only carries)Mutantsteak wrote:
What do you mean quality, explainDavid.P wrote:
True, but the quality of the succeeding games did drop. The last game I played was ruby on my sis's DS. God damn did it suck. Red=Blue=Silver>Everything else.
I could go on but I have work tomorrow.
The whole type fire, water, grass is a trademark and starter pokemon is something that shouldn't be changed. The fact that each starter is weak to another is why they are starters. You're saying its getting old but its the same as the original, then how are they worse. When they remade red and blue into firered and leafgreen it added on to the same story and many battle differences and improvements that im not going to explain. If you play the newest games and know everything about ingame values than it is very difficult going down and playing old games. So much is improved from the generation before. The original games had a huge store that has everything (Celadon) so that argument is irrelevant. The new games make changes while keeping the feel of the originals (fire, water, grass starters) so they games keep their appeal, while adding much more replayability options and much more customization possibilities
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
No.Mutantsteak wrote:
You should call in sick
Because it is being rehashed and reused, not being innovated upon. Look I like the originals as much as the next guy, but not taking something good and expanding upon it is stupid. Especially when there is so much potential.Mutantsteak wrote:
The whole type fire, water, grass is a trademark and starter pokemon is something that shouldn't be changed. The fact that each starter is weak to another is why they are starters. You're saying its getting old but its the same as the original, then how are they worse.
Have'nt played any pokemon games since ruby. So maybe you're right that there is something different about them. But a 20 year old will look stupid going in to a gamestop and buying pokemon games.Mutantsteak wrote:
When they remade red and blue into firered and leafgreen it added on to the same story and many battle differences and improvements that im not going to explain. If you play the newest games and know everything about ingame values than it is very difficult going down and playing old games.
Remember that City in silver that had that radio tower and that underground store? Like I said i like the originals as much as the next guy, but taking the same basic plot, recycling it by putting a new coat of paint on is not really making it better.(Evil organization, starter triangle, rival, etc etc)Mutantsteak wrote:
So much is improved from the generation before. The original games had a huge store that has everything (Celadon) so that argument is irrelevant. The new games make changes while keeping the feel of the originals (fire, water, grass starters) so they games keep their appeal, while adding much more replayability options and much more customization possibilities
EDIT: It was goldenrod city with the 6 story pokemart like celadon.
Last edited by David.P (2008-08-21 22:19:48)
David.P wrote:
Because it is being rehashed and reused, not being innovated upon. Look I like the originals as much as the next guy, but not taking something good and expanding upon it is stupid. Especially when there is so much potential.
You have no idea what has been added if you haven't played a game since ruby. WiFi trading/battling, indepth battle changes and the addition of new pokemon and attacks gives so much more to the game. There is potential and it is being used, you obviously can't have an opinion if you haven't played it (Well the opinion is worthless to me anyway)David.P wrote:
Have'nt played any pokemon games since ruby. So maybe you're right that there is something different about them. But a 20 year old will look stupid going in to a gamestop and buying pokemon games.
Last edited by Mutantsteak (2008-08-22 00:02:20)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Blaine tbh
Then why bother going on?Mutantsteak wrote:
There is potential and it is being used, you obviously can't have an opinion if you haven't played it (Well the opinion is worthless to me anyway)
You're discussing pokemon? Rofl, it's a kid game, grow up!
gtfo pokemon is tehshit.Jebus wrote:
You're discussing pokemon? Rofl, it's a kid game, grow up!
brocks so hot too.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Sabrina.
I'd use my water gun on Misty's face.
id use my willyT1g3r217 wrote:
I'd use my water gun on Misty's face.
id use blastoiseSamTheMan:D wrote:
id use my willyT1g3r217 wrote:
I'd use my water gun on Misty's face.
i g wrote:
id use blastoiseSamTheMan:D wrote:
id use my willyT1g3r217 wrote:
I'd use my water gun on Misty's face.
Pretty sure Misty is suppose to be like 12 years old.