I'm voting tommorow

2008-10-20 20:47:12

#26

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,991|7050|949

Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
What the fuck are the:

PSL
CPF
PRO
OBJ
SWEP
AIP
SPF
BTP

parties?

Also, lol, they should have a "None" option for tax collector >_>
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
What happens if you write-in a name that many people have? Like uh, Stephen Johnson or John Brown or something.
somebody just answer the fucking questions

www.justfuckinggoogleit.com - answer for #1 (or yes, they are other parties).

There would need to be a lot of write-in votes for that particular person, in which case they probably would be popular enough to differentiate from the other similar-named.

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-10-20 20:47:41)

2008-10-20 20:47:39

#27

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6571|what

Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
What the fuck are the:

PSL
CPF
PRO
OBJ
SWEP
AIP
SPF
BTP

parties?

Also, lol, they should have a "None" option for tax collector >_>
Hurricane2k9 wrote:
What happens if you write-in a name that many people have? Like uh, Stephen Johnson or John Brown or something.
somebody just answer the fucking questions

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/deadlin … ctions2008

2008-10-20 20:48:10

#28

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7019|132 and Bush

Write ins, I think they have to be a member of a party (not sure). That party puts forward an official candidate.

Edit: Look here for a better explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write-in_candidate

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-10-20 20:48:40

#29

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6571|what

The list includes independent candidate Ralph Nader, Libertarian candidate Bob Barr as well as candidates from the Green Party, the Prohibition Party, the Socialist Party, the Socialist Workers Party and even a party called the Boston Tea Party.

lmao. A party with a sense of humour.

2008-10-20 20:49:38

#30

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6120|College Park, MD

lmfao, a socialists party.

Nothing tops this though:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_raving_loony_party

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

2008-10-20 20:50:15

#31

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7019|132 and Bush

Hurricane2k9 wrote:
What the fuck are the:

PSL
CPF
PRO
OBJ
SWEP
AIP
SPF
BTP

parties?

http://election.dos.state.fl.us/candidate/parties.shtml

Party for Socialism and Liberation - Florida (PSL)

Constitution Party of Florida (CPF)
Web address: http://www.cpflorida.com/

Progressive Libertarian Party (PRL)
Web address: http://www.prlparty.org/

Objectivist Party of Florida (OBJ)

America's Independent Party of Florida (AIP)

Socialist Party of Florida (SPF)

Boston Tea Party of Florida (BTP)

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-10-20 20:51:31

#32

Mutantbear: Semi Constructive Criticism; +1,431|6383|London, England

XXX, X Party

I wanna be part of that party, Bill Clinton has nothing against these candidates

Last edited by Mutantsteak (2008-10-20 20:51:38)

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

2008-10-20 20:54:15

#33

topal63: . . .; +533|7136

TheAussieReaper wrote:
The list includes independent candidate Ralph Nader, Libertarian candidate Bob Barr as well as candidates from the Green Party, the Prohibition Party, the Socialist Party, the Socialist Workers Party and even a party called the Boston Tea Party.

lmao. A party with a sense of humour.

I like the that one to: the Boston Tea Party. Very cute.

2008-10-20 20:55:07

#34

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6571|what

Mutantsteak wrote:
XXX, X Party

I wanna be part of that party, Bill Clinton has nothing against these candidates

I'm against the XXX party candidates.

I'm up against them and pounding away.

2008-10-20 21:01:44

#35

Reciprocity: Member; +721|6999|the dank(super) side of Oregon

I've already voted using my states superior system.

I win.

Vote Obama because our Supreme Court should never be tilted too far in either direction.

2008-10-20 21:05:34

#36

topthrill05: Member; +125|6996|Rochester NY USA

Reciprocity wrote:
I've already voted using my states superior system.

I win.

Vote Obama because our Supreme Court should never be tilted too far in either direction.

And that is one of the biggest issues actually. I agree with ya.

2008-10-20 21:06:42

#37

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7019|132 and Bush

The objectivist party will not get my vote. Why? Because they quoted Les Miserables on the homepage of their site.
http://www.objectivistparty.us/

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-10-20 21:10:29

#38

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7019|132 and Bush

Reciprocity wrote:
I've already voted using my states superior system.

I win.

Vote Obama because our Supreme Court should never be tilted too far in either direction.

Would be tough in my state.. seeing how it's six time your population. We've had enough controversy.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-10-20 21:10:42

#39

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,991|7050|949

Kmarion wrote:
The objectivist party will not get my vote. Why? Because they quoted Les Miserables on the homepage of their site.
http://www.objectivistparty.us/

+ Ayn Rand and objectivism suck.

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-10-20 21:11:57)

2008-10-20 21:11:28

#40

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6571|what

Kmarion wrote:
The objectivist party will not get my vote. Why? Because they quoted Les Miserables on the homepage of their site.
http://www.objectivistparty.us/

Those are some weird objectives.

At least they quoted their source of the quote.

2008-10-20 21:29:28

#41

topal63: . . .; +533|7136

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Kmarion wrote:
The objectivist party will not get my vote. Why? Because they quoted Les Miserables on the homepage of their site.
http://www.objectivistparty.us/
+ Ayn Rand and objectivism suck.

Yeah, but it was good as a reference for BioSchock. The evil objectivist overtones gave the game atmosphere. It was an objectivistic apocalyptic nightmare - in which the heroic became monsters and the fountain-head of it's creation didn't even challenge his own-death. His ideals and sense of freedom were a farce; a hollow shell of a human being worthy of death by the hand of a unwitting Manchurian-candidate slave. Anyways... Now "would you kindly" go vote for the corporate party. McCain or Obama! Ooh the differences are overwhelming and freedom is at stake - this is the most important election in the history of our great democracy. Now "would you kindly" go vote for one of those two. Because it goes without saying: that you are a free man and not a slave of the system.

Last edited by topal63 (2008-10-20 21:41:07)

2008-10-20 21:39:24

#42

462nd NSP653: Devout Moderate, Empty Head.; +57|7102

topal63 wrote:
Vote McCain. Here is my theory!!! He's first on the list. USA... NUM-BER... ONE... USA... NUM-BER... ONE...

Impeccable logic if you're a senile 80+ year old person. I mean seriously I wonder how many Florida seniors will just choose - choice #1.

Probably just about as many blacks who will vote for #2. See Howard Stern, Sal and Harlem.

2008-10-20 23:00:50

#43

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|7083|NT, like Mick Dundee

Unrelated: HOLY CRAP, the Dems candidate for State Rep where Kezza lives...

His name is almost identical to mine.

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2008-10-20 23:08:28

#44

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7019|132 and Bush

Flecco wrote:
Unrelated: HOLY CRAP, the Dems candidate for State Rep where Kezza lives...

His name is almost identical to mine.

Jebediah Clampet?

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-10-20 23:35:32

#45

DonFck: Hibernator; +3,227|7049|Finland

Hurricane2k9 wrote:
What happens if you write-in a name that many people have? Like uh, Stephen Johnson or John Brown or something.

I doubt that you can Rickroll a presidential election.

I need around tree fiddy.

2008-10-20 23:42:57

#46

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|7093|Canberra, AUS

From a global perspective I would prefer Obama is elected - especially on climate change, nuclear proliferation, diplomacy etc. These aspects of his policy I like over McCain's.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2008-10-20 23:49:37

#47

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|7019|132 and Bush

O' jeez.. so much for avoiding lines by early voting.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081021/ap_ … rly_voting

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-10-20 23:53:55

#48

nukchebi0: Пушкин, наше всё; +387|6742|New Haven, CT

President: Obama, because he would maintain the court's balance, and seems more prudent in decision making.

FL-12 Representative: Tudor - he's new and out of the navy, so he won't be a complete failure in terms of partisanship out of the start. Putnam also seems too partisan, and unethical/immoral (they may appear to be bad reasons, but I can usually judge candidates accurately in this manner).

2008-10-21 01:41:30

#49

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|7093|Canberra, AUS

Kmarion wrote:
O' jeez.. so much for avoiding lines by early voting.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081021/ap_ … rly_voting

Seems that everyone had the same idea

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2008-10-21 02:36:44

#50

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|7039|London, England

£10 on FL fucking everything up again

hope the rays lose

BF2S Forums I'm voting tommorow

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Mutantsteak wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

Reciprocity wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

topal63 wrote:

Flecco wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Board footer