Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-11-06 18:44:12)
I am, very much so, for all who accept responsibility for themelves and their actions and the results of their decisons, they have have my unwavering support. Those that feed upon them, society can live without.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Huh, I pegged you as the compassionate conservative type.
Spoiler (highlight to read):
Just joking, I know your heart is made of granite.
Suffer, how so?lowing wrote:
Actually I coundn't care less, what I want is them to suffer for the pain they cause innocent people.
and poor people.lowing wrote:
for criminals?Reciprocity wrote:
may I suggest concentration camps? They're a very efficient means of sequestering the "undesireables" at minimal cost.Turquoise wrote:
Sure... if you want more crime, we can do that.
Suffer how? Nothing less than the pain they inflictTheAussieReaper wrote:
Suffer, how so?lowing wrote:
Actually I coundn't care less, what I want is them to suffer for the pain they cause innocent people.
You think they enjoy prison?
And you know there is such as thing as wrongful detainment.
Why, is being poor breaking a law?Reciprocity wrote:
and poor people.lowing wrote:
for criminals?Reciprocity wrote:
may I suggest concentration camps? They're a very efficient means of sequestering the "undesireables" at minimal cost.
Last edited by lowing (2008-11-07 11:23:51)
We should probably just kill all convicts. It would be cheaper, right?lowing wrote:
Suffer how? Nothing less than the pain they inflictTheAussieReaper wrote:
Suffer, how so?lowing wrote:
Actually I coundn't care less, what I want is them to suffer for the pain they cause innocent people.
You think they enjoy prison?
And you know there is such as thing as wrongful detainment.
Yup sure do, so what are you telling me? That we need to make 100% sure we have the right person? OR that we need t otake it easy on everyone because ya never know?
Send them to Australia.. thats what the Brits didTurquoise wrote:
We should probably just kill all convicts. It would be cheaper, right?lowing wrote:
Suffer how? Nothing less than the pain they inflictTheAussieReaper wrote:
Suffer, how so?
You think they enjoy prison?
And you know there is such as thing as wrongful detainment.
Yup sure do, so what are you telling me? That we need to make 100% sure we have the right person? OR that we need t otake it easy on everyone because ya never know?
There you go, lowing. The final solution, as it were.stryyker wrote:
Send them to Australia.. thats what the Brits didTurquoise wrote:
We should probably just kill all convicts. It would be cheaper, right?lowing wrote:
Suffer how? Nothing less than the pain they inflict
Yup sure do, so what are you telling me? That we need to make 100% sure we have the right person? OR that we need t otake it easy on everyone because ya never know?
Heh... the irony is that your standard of living is higher than the U.K.'s....TheAussieReaper wrote:
Worked out for us, anyway...
But we're full. Fuck off.
Don't you only inhabit like 1% of your land?TheAussieReaper wrote:
Worked out for us, anyway...
But we're full. Fuck off.
Burn them yourself, the Germans can help with drawings ovens if thats what you have in mind.put all the poor people, rich people, liberals, junkies, welfare recipients, homeless, sick, women, children, elderly, unfit people into it
Stop trying to get on my good side Turquoise.Turquoise wrote:
We should probably just kill all convicts. It would be cheaper, right?lowing wrote:
Suffer how? Nothing less than the pain they inflictTheAussieReaper wrote:
Suffer, how so?
You think they enjoy prison?
And you know there is such as thing as wrongful detainment.
Yup sure do, so what are you telling me? That we need to make 100% sure we have the right person? OR that we need t otake it easy on everyone because ya never know?
But Aussie pay sucks thats why alot of them come over here to work.Turquoise wrote:
Heh... the irony is that your standard of living is higher than the U.K.'s....TheAussieReaper wrote:
Worked out for us, anyway...
But we're full. Fuck off.
poor people are a burden on society, just like criminals. so yes, being poor is breaking the law, or it should be.lowing wrote:
Why, is being poor breaking a law?Reciprocity wrote:
and poor people.lowing wrote:
for criminals?
No you are not, if you were you would agree that people should be held accountable for their actions and decisions. Apparently you do not.Reciprocity wrote:
poor people are a burden on society, just like criminals. so yes, being poor is breaking the law, or it should be.lowing wrote:
Why, is being poor breaking a law?Reciprocity wrote:
and poor people.
i'm taking your ideas to their logic conclusion
I would rather have people actually hurt for the pain they cause innocent people.[F7F7]KiNG_KaDaFFHi wrote:
I´d rather have rehabilitation then suffering when it comes down to prison, hand out the rehab needed and try to solve the problem and ofcourse also some kind of punishment, but just the suffering part doesn´t work. If you eliminate the rehab part you will never eliminate the problems that send people to jail.
I know, I just spent 6 months "suffering" instead of beeing rehablitatied.
Which achieves what exactly?Lowing wrote:
I would rather have people actually hurt for the pain they cause innocent people.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2008-11-10 04:27:01)
Already said I am not interested in rehab in criminals, I want them to actually PAY for their crimes. They already knew the difference between right and wrong, and they CHOSE wrong. So be it.Dilbert_X wrote:
Which achieves what exactly?Lowing wrote:
I would rather have people actually hurt for the pain they cause innocent people.
An eye for an eye and we all end up ranting sadistic nutballs.
I would rather have people do something useful, like collecting rattlesnakes.
PS, ur sig fails
I don't often agree with lowing but I do follow him somewhat on the concept that legal punishment should entail some form of actual punishment and not just rehabilitation... I would stop short of the death penalty though.lowing wrote:
Already said I am not interested in rehab in criminals, I want them to actually PAY for their crimes. They already knew the difference between right and wrong, and they CHOSE wrong. So be it.Dilbert_X wrote:
Which achieves what exactly?Lowing wrote:
I would rather have people actually hurt for the pain they cause innocent people.
An eye for an eye and we all end up ranting sadistic nutballs.
I would rather have people do something useful, like collecting rattlesnakes.
PS, ur sig fails
and I would enhance it.Braddock wrote:
I don't often agree with lowing but I do follow him somewhat on the concept that legal punishment should entail some form of actual punishment and not just rehabilitation... I would stop short of the death penalty though.lowing wrote:
Already said I am not interested in rehab in criminals, I want them to actually PAY for their crimes. They already knew the difference between right and wrong, and they CHOSE wrong. So be it.Dilbert_X wrote:
Which achieves what exactly?
An eye for an eye and we all end up ranting sadistic nutballs.
I would rather have people do something useful, like collecting rattlesnakes.
PS, ur sig fails
*alarming similarities with ME religious nutjobs*lowing wrote:
and I would enhance it.Braddock wrote:
I don't often agree with lowing but I do follow him somewhat on the concept that legal punishment should entail some form of actual punishment and not just rehabilitation... I would stop short of the death penalty though.lowing wrote:
Already said I am not interested in rehab in criminals, I want them to actually PAY for their crimes. They already knew the difference between right and wrong, and they CHOSE wrong. So be it.
I have always wondered, why do we let someone off easy for "attempted murder," or "attempted robbery?" Does the fact that they were not competent enough to finish it mean they get a break? I think the act of attempting a crime should carry the same penalty as fully committing it.lowing wrote:
and I would enhance it.Braddock wrote:
I don't often agree with lowing but I do follow him somewhat on the concept that legal punishment should entail some form of actual punishment and not just rehabilitation... I would stop short of the death penalty though.lowing wrote:
Already said I am not interested in rehab in criminals, I want them to actually PAY for their crimes. They already knew the difference between right and wrong, and they CHOSE wrong. So be it.
