i3D.nl out with some fancy anti-hack thing.

2009-01-01 12:22:10

#1

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6455|Winland

e-mail wrote:
i3D.net now offers hack protection on Battlefield 2 Ranked servers

i3D.net now offers BF2ahd� on i3D.net hosted Battlefield 2 Ranked game servers. BF2ahd protects your Battlefield2 game server from known hacks that can cause your servers to crash.

* BF2ahd detects and prevents multiple vehicle/uav/supply drops
* BF2ahd detects and prevents non-commander drops
* BF2ahd detects and prevents fake names
* BF2ahd minimizes the chance of all players crashing back to desktop
* BF2ahd detects and prevents chat spam

i3D.net clients who wish to upgrade to this additional service can upgrade by sending in a ticket with a request for BF2ahd. The costs are 25 euros one time for manual setup of this hack protection tool.

Dunno if it's been posted before. No matter, it seems like a good thing.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-01-01 12:23:39

#2

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7087

Sounds nice.

2009-01-01 13:12:28

#3

TunaMan: Mouse-Pilot; +29|6042|Israel

25 euros? O_O

I mean, it sounds really really great, but with that price, it's better to wait for patch 1.5 - AKA the next century

2009-01-01 13:28:45

#4

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6823|Area 51

I3D.nl wrote:
i3D.net now offers hack protection on Battlefield 2 Ranked servers

Wait, wut? You're going to tell me they didn't have any hack protection (or good ones) and now they have to pay on top of the monthly server costs just to get those hack protection. Fucking extortionists.

2009-01-01 14:03:16

#5

Snake: Missing, Presumed Dead; +1,046|6824|England

RDMC wrote:
I3D.nl wrote:
i3D.net now offers hack protection on Battlefield 2 Ranked servers
Wait, wut? You're going to tell me they didn't have any hack protection (or good ones) and now they have to pay on top of the monthly server costs just to get those hack protection. Fucking extortionists.

Development costs from a 3rd part, doing what EA/DICE should have done long ago tbh

Sounds good.

2009-01-01 21:00:54

#6

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6455|Winland

RegMan wrote:
25 euros? O_O

I mean, it sounds really really great, but with that price, it's better to wait for patch 1.5 - AKA the next century

25€ once. If you can't afford that, I don't see how you can afford a server.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-01-01 21:17:11

#7

tkoi: Utahraptor!; +148|6405|Texas

It's a sad comment on a game's developer support when third parties are patching its security flaws.

2009-01-02 00:48:23

#8

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6455|Winland

GGF0RCE wrote:
It's a sad comment on a game's developer support when third parties are patching its security flaws.

Very true.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-01-02 02:14:44

#9

TunaMan: Mouse-Pilot; +29|6042|Israel

Freezer7Pro wrote:
RegMan wrote:
25 euros? O_O

I mean, it sounds really really great, but with that price, it's better to wait for patch 1.5 - AKA the next century
25€ once. If you can't afford that, I don't see how you can afford a server.

Actually, I don't even have a server, nor do I want one. Yet 25 for such thing which someone I know did for free is simply too expensive.

2009-01-02 14:18:53

#10

GateKeeper{NL}: Member; +142|6627

GGF0RCE wrote:
It's a sad comment on a game's developer support when third parties are patching its security flaws.

third party programs?

Sounds like a free PB ban to me

Bf2+ 3rd party thingies + PB = ban?

2009-01-02 14:52:12

#11

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6823|Area 51

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
It's a sad comment on a game's developer support when third parties are patching its security flaws.
third party programs?

Sounds like a free PB ban to me

Bf2+ 3rd party thingies + PB = ban?

This is installed on the server, rather than on your PC. So no bans from PB there

Even if it would be so, the ban wouldn't even be free. It would run you €25

Last edited by RDMC (2009-01-02 14:52:39)

2009-01-03 00:56:33

#12

Fat_Swinub: jaff; +125|6693

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
It's a sad comment on a game's developer support when third parties are patching its security flaws.
third party programs?

Sounds like a free PB ban to me

Bf2+ 3rd party thingies + PB = ban?

What do you think BF2cc and autoadmin are?

2009-01-03 16:56:23

#13

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6455|Winland

RegMan wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
RegMan wrote:
25 euros? O_O

I mean, it sounds really really great, but with that price, it's better to wait for patch 1.5 - AKA the next century
25€ once. If you can't afford that, I don't see how you can afford a server.
Actually, I don't even have a server, nor do I want one. Yet 25 for such thing which someone I know did for free is simply too expensive.

25€ is still nothing for anyone over the age of 16.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-01-03 18:09:31

#14

Krupp23: Member; +2|6476

EUR 25 ONCE - you pay for the setup and NOT for the software (http://BF2ahd.2F4Y.com).

2F4Y.com initially developed that tool to protect their own servers from hack-caused crashes and it works great.

2009-01-04 01:06:22

#15

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6455|Winland

Krupp23 wrote:
EUR 25 ONCE - you pay for the setup and NOT for the software (http://BF2ahd.2F4Y.com).

2F4Y.com initially developed that tool to protect their own servers from hack-caused crashes and it works great.

Well, there's a familiar face.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-01-04 07:29:09

#16

TunaMan: Mouse-Pilot; +29|6042|Israel

Freezer7Pro wrote:
RegMan wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:

25€ once. If you can't afford that, I don't see how you can afford a server.
Actually, I don't even have a server, nor do I want one. Yet 25 for such thing which someone I know did for free is simply too expensive.
25€ is still nothing for anyone over the age of 16.

Oh, that makes sense now... Am just 16

2009-01-04 07:49:19

#17

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6455|Winland

RegMan wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
RegMan wrote:

Actually, I don't even have a server, nor do I want one. Yet 25 for such thing which someone I know did for free is simply too expensive.
25€ is still nothing for anyone over the age of 16.
Oh, that makes sense now... Am just 16

Should make it over 13.

I too am 16 and it is nothing.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-01-04 08:12:14

#18

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6046|Catherine Black

Hey Freezer can I borrow €25?

2009-01-04 08:19:53

#19

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6455|Winland

Finray wrote:
Hey Freezer can I borrow €25?

If you spend it on either real drugs or anti-cheat system setup for a server I get the RCON pass for.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-01-04 08:30:58

#20

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6046|Catherine Black

Freezer7Pro wrote:
Finray wrote:
Hey Freezer can I borrow €25?
If you spend it on either real drugs or anti-cheat system setup for a server I get the RCON pass for.

Real drugs I can do.

Anti cheat system is too lame.

2009-01-04 22:46:21

#21

GateKeeper{NL}: Member; +142|6627

Fat_Swinub wrote:
GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
GGF0RCE wrote:
It's a sad comment on a game's developer support when third parties are patching its security flaws.
third party programs?

Sounds like a free PB ban to me

Bf2+ 3rd party thingies + PB = ban?
What do you think BF2cc and autoadmin are?

PB should ban players playing on AutoAdmin servers.

no.....?

Atleast boycot them?

no.....?

2009-01-05 05:19:08

#22

jmsprovan: Member; +18|6070|Alba

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:
PB should ban players playing on AutoAdmin servers.

this, autoadmin is based off of a hack which allows much more control over the game than was originally intended. i don't understand why they haven't condemned it yet. ;-/

Last edited by jmsprovan (2009-01-05 05:19:43)

2009-01-05 05:30:31

#23

GateKeeper{NL}: Member; +142|6627

My guess,

"The patch is stalled due to this kind of shit like Auto admin/own scripts/etc, etc. "

Some people came up with "security measures" for things that didn't even exist

like

patch 1.12 * FIX : Fixed issue where player could manipulate there name/nickname

patch 1.2 Guess what 187Ci came up with........ geez

let sleeping dogs sleep plz!

2009-01-05 09:02:25

#24

JoshP: Banned; +176|5947|Notts, UK

wait wait wait

first person to get PB to ban auto admin for being hax wins 3 free internets

2009-01-05 09:37:33

#25

jmsprovan: Member; +18|6070|Alba

i guess PB don't ban autoadmin because even though its a hack it assists the community (although that is debatable...), also because removing it would make all the server owners who require it to keep their server clean emorage and stop hosting which is bad for bf2.

Last edited by jmsprovan (2009-01-05 09:38:00)

BF2S Forums i3D.nl out with some fancy anti-hack thing.

e-mail wrote:

I3D.nl wrote:

RDMC wrote:

I3D.nl wrote:

RegMan wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

RegMan wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

RegMan wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

RegMan wrote:

Krupp23 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

RegMan wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

RegMan wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

RegMan wrote:

Finray wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Finray wrote:

Fat_Swinub wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

GGF0RCE wrote:

GateKeeper{NL} wrote:

Board footer