War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|7154|Purplicious Wisconsin

Mutantsteak wrote:

I forgot how cute parker was
I forgot how homo you are.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Roc18
`
+655|6231|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY

War Man wrote:

Mutantsteak wrote:

I forgot how cute parker was
I forgot how homo you are.
inb4gaywarmananalbutsecksjokes
Mutantbear
Semi Constructive Criticism
+1,431|6405|London, England

Hes still sore about my 8 year old joke

Probably alot sorer after im through with him
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ https://i.imgur.com/Xj4f2.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6638|Winland

M4/M4A1. Lovely guns, they are.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Parker
isteal
+1,452|6835|The Gem Saloon

Poseidon wrote:

you have linked to that video over 9000 times my friend

not that there's anything wrong with that...

I'd probably say M1 Garand, FAMAS and the Steyr AUG.
true enough. but its some damn good shootin, so im proud
SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6928|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

Parker wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

you have linked to that video over 9000 times my friend

not that there's anything wrong with that...

I'd probably say M1 Garand, FAMAS and the Steyr AUG.
true enough. but its some damn good shootin, so im proud
You were 15ft away! You better hit center mass lol! And its a magazine not a clip! Your still sexy though

Last edited by SgtHeihn (2009-02-01 21:31:10)

rdx-fx
...
+955|7032
If I had to pick ONE weapon as a general purpose do-it-all rifle, the M110 in 7.62x51.
(Or a similarly configured Armalite AR-10 + Krieger barrel + Geissele trigger + Nightforce scope + Magpul PRS stock + Daniel Defense free-float fore-end)

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/M110_ECP_Left.jpg
Reciprocity
Member
+721|7021|the dank(super) side of Oregon

rdx-fx wrote:

If I had to pick ONE weapon as a general purpose do-it-all rifle, the M110 in 7.62x51.
(Or a similarly configured Armalite AR-10 + Krieger barrel + Geissele trigger + Nightforce scope + Magpul PRS stock + Daniel Defense free-float fore-end)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … P_Left.jpg
You don't like the Leupold?
SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6928|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)
I just like how the Army is so quick to drop the M24, they just adopted it not that long ago. They go from the M21 to M24 to M110, learn from the Marines and keep multiple options in your inventory  M40A3, SR25, DMR(M14) and M107.  With that you have all your missions covered.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|7021|the dank(super) side of Oregon
I haven't done much research on these new fangled semiauto sniper rifles.  Are they as accurate as the M24 at extended ranges?

Last edited by Reciprocity (2009-02-01 22:10:36)

SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6928|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

Reciprocity wrote:

I haven't done much research on these new fangled semiautos sniper rifles.  Are they as accurate as the M24 at extended ranges?
I don't think any semi is going to be as accurate as a bolt rifle at long range. But they were dropping dudes at 100-600m when we were using them.
rdx-fx
...
+955|7032

Reciprocity wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

If I had to pick ONE weapon as a general purpose do-it-all rifle, the M110 in 7.62x51.
(Or a similarly configured Armalite AR-10 + Krieger barrel + Geissele trigger + Nightforce scope + Magpul PRS stock + Daniel Defense free-float fore-end)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … P_Left.jpg
You don't like the Leupold?
Leupold is a pretty good scope.  I'd put it in the middle price/performance-wise.  For a hunting rifle, it's fine.  For a military rifle, it has issues.
1) Stadia wires (crosshairs) can come loose too easily
2) Seals are not as rugged as they should be, and leak if subjected to any abuse.
3) Turret adjustments aren't always repeatable.  First stop after buying a Leupold is the aftermarket shop, for replacement turret hardware.
4) Glass is not as good as it could be (optical clarity, color trueness, low-light transmissiveness) = eye fatigue after a few less minutes.

Some of the Leupolds cost as much as a Nightforce, Schmidt & Bender, IOR, or Zeiss -but they are NOT in the same league for military or competition shooting.

For an easy-to-read comparison of scopes;
http://www.6mmbr.com/optics.html


Edit: and if you're hunting/shooting when it's nearly/mostly dark out - go Schmidt und Bender.  They were designed from the start as an optic for hunting german predators at twilight.  (The animal variety, not the "have a seat over here" human variety... in case that was unclear).

Last edited by rdx-fx (2009-02-01 22:19:40)

Reciprocity
Member
+721|7021|the dank(super) side of Oregon
Sounds like a good rifle for the current situation.   Hopefully they'll only mothball the M24s, they'll probably need them again.

Last edited by Reciprocity (2009-02-02 18:46:38)

Reciprocity
Member
+721|7021|the dank(super) side of Oregon

rdx-fx wrote:

Leupold is a pretty good scope.  I'd put it in the middle price/performance-wise.  For a hunting rifle, it's fine.  For a military rifle, it has issues.
1) Stadia wires (crosshairs) can come loose too easily
2) Seals are not as rugged as they should be, and leak if subjected to any abuse.
3) Turret adjustments aren't always repeatable.  First stop after buying a Leupold is the aftermarket shop, for replacement turret hardware.
4) Glass is not as good as it could be (optical clarity, color trueness, low-light transmissiveness) = eye fatigue after a few less minutes.

Some of the Leupolds cost as much as a Nightforce, Schmidt & Bender, IOR, or Zeiss -but they are NOT in the same league for military or competition shooting.

For an easy-to-read comparison of scopes;
http://www.6mmbr.com/optics.html


Edit: and if you're hunting/shooting when it's nearly/mostly dark out - go Schmidt und Bender.  They were designed from the start as an optic for hunting german predators at twilight.  (The animal variety, not the "have a seat over here" human variety... in case that was unclear).
lol, I was sorta teasing.


I've got a USO ST-10 on my target rifle.  I love my MOA reticle and my EREK knob.
rdx-fx
...
+955|7032

Reciprocity wrote:

I haven't done much research on these new fangled semiauto sniper rifles.  Are they as accurate as the M24 at extended ranges?
Edit: short executive summary of following text - Current semi-auto sniper rifles are capable of holding the same, if not better, accuracy as compared to previous bolt-action rifles. Your mileage may vary.  Not available in Pink, Lavender , or chartruse.  not for sale in NY, NJ, CA, or IL

Depends on how well they're put together.

A factory Remington 700 bolt-action will generally hold a 1" to 2" group at 100 yards (or 1 to 2 Minute of Angle)

A properly assembled semi-auto SDM-R (Squad Designated Marksman Rifle) or M110 will hold 1/2" to 1/4" groups at 100 yards.
You need a $250 Colt Armorer's set to build one of these.  Fits in a lunchbox, mostly.

A recent M24 or M40 bolt action sniper rifle (generally a tuned Remington 700, with custom stock/barrel/trigger/scope), tuned by a gunsmith, will hold 1/2" groups at 100yd.  You need a lathe, drill press, and other tools to build one of these.

A M14 or M21 requires a lathe, soldering equipment, drill press, torches, sacrifices to Ancient Dieties, and constant blood rituals to keep tuned to 1" to 1/2" groups.  Don't ask me about mounting scopes on them - I don't wanna go there.

The really nice feature of the M-16 family of rifles (AR-15, M-4, M-16, AR-10, M110, etc, etc..) is that the ONLY mechanical parts that have a real effect on the accuracy of the rifle are the Bolt, Barrel, Trigger, and to a minor degree, the Lower Receiver.
-
On an M-16 derivative, you can just screw the parts together - there isn't the need for a lathe, drill press, or full-time gunsmith to work on them.
They are an armorer's weapon, rather than a gunsmiths weapon.



BUT - just like any firearm debate, you will find proponents of each of the above weapon system that SWEAR their particular system is The One True Path, and all else is heresy.  And every camp has plenty of people that have "been there, done that" in the worst possible way.

Last edited by rdx-fx (2009-02-01 22:41:28)

rdx-fx
...
+955|7032

Reciprocity wrote:

lol, I was sorta teasing.


I've got a USO ST-10 on my target rifle.  I love my MOA reticle and my EREK knob.
oh, very nice!

I knew I was forgetting one of the upper-end scope makers.  US Optics, I'd put in the same boat as Nightforce.
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|7067|Canada
FG 42
Gewer 43
BAR

and of course, MP44
Lai
Member
+186|6592

Roc18 wrote:

https://www.freewebs.com/onthebattlefield/Tokyo-Marui-H&K-G36C-4.jpg

I actually hate guns
Somehow that gun reminds me of this one, which I guess would be my alltime favorite: the Astartes Godwyn pattern MkVb.

https://wh40k.lexicanum.com/mediawiki/images/9/93/MkII_bolter.jpg
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|7154|Purplicious Wisconsin

SgtHeihn wrote:

I just like how the Army is so quick to drop the M24, they just adopted it not that long ago. They go from the M21 to M24 to M110, learn from the Marines and keep multiple options in your inventory  M40A3, SR25, DMR(M14) and M107.  With that you have all your missions covered.
The m21 got adopted in the 1960's and the m24 got adopted in the 1980's, so it shouldn't come as a surprise the m110 is being adopted right now.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6928|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

War Man wrote:

SgtHeihn wrote:

I just like how the Army is so quick to drop the M24, they just adopted it not that long ago. They go from the M21 to M24 to M110, learn from the Marines and keep multiple options in your inventory  M40A3, SR25, DMR(M14) and M107.  With that you have all your missions covered.
The m21 got adopted in the 1960's and the m24 got adopted in the 1980's, so it shouldn't come as a surprise the m110 is being adopted right now.
The original M40 series has its roots in Vietnam. The SR-25/M110 is based off the AR-10(1950's). The M24 was only adopted in 1988 which is ultra modern technology in military terms. The Army is very-very knee jerk when dealing with things, which can be good and bad.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+564|7154|Purplicious Wisconsin

SgtHeihn wrote:

War Man wrote:

SgtHeihn wrote:

I just like how the Army is so quick to drop the M24, they just adopted it not that long ago. They go from the M21 to M24 to M110, learn from the Marines and keep multiple options in your inventory  M40A3, SR25, DMR(M14) and M107.  With that you have all your missions covered.
The m21 got adopted in the 1960's and the m24 got adopted in the 1980's, so it shouldn't come as a surprise the m110 is being adopted right now.
The original M40 series has its roots in Vietnam. The SR-25/M110 is based off the AR-10(1950's). The M24 was only adopted in 1988 which is ultra modern technology in military terms. The Army is very-very knee jerk when dealing with things, which can be good and bad.
That's one of the differences with the branches.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
The_Sniper_NM
Official EVGA Fanboy
+94|6554|SC | USA |
Rifle:
My Bushmaster XM-15 Varminter (Fluted/Floated 24in Upper/ DCM Competition Lower w/ trigger)

Pistol:
My Dads Kimber 1911. Nuff said.

Last edited by The_Sniper_NM (2009-02-02 10:16:48)

aerodynamic
FOCKING HELL
+241|6194|Roma
But i did actually fire an ak47, svd and the mosin nagant.
And i have to say, pulling the blot back and forth feels sooooo good.
https://bf3s.com/sigs/8ea27f2d75b353b0a18b096ed75ec5e142da7cc2.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard