BF2S Forums Battlefield 2 EU Server!

justice wrote:

Metal-Eater-GR wrote:

what is everyones beef with BF2s anyway?

Maybe if fucksticks like irish could keep their mouth shut, people would have less beef.

Read that xfire convo....seriously....even if he did shut the server (which I doubt) try talking with a bit of maturity to him, or just don't talk....especially as you're an admin.

Read that batman guy's 5 first replies. It's pretty clear he crashed the server, and his attitude is fucking disgusting.

baggs wrote:

BF2S server is missing some team work and a few (of the same) people are whoring vehicles

ya...total shock right?  lol.  thats why infantry would be better.  but, the point whores wont listen to ya.

Simon wrote:

Change it to infantry tbh

This and I might play on it.

Snake wrote:

@ Baggs: So what? People can play as they see fit. "Whoring vehicles" is like saying someone on IO whores an AK.

Oh yeah totally, i'm not refuting the fact that people can do what they want. But round after round of the same people spamming tanks/jets/helos etc....just gets a bit shite. Add to that the scenario when you reach a flag and BOOOOOOM arty on your face blah blah blah.

And i think the point that Marine said about points whoring, in general, vehicle (tank/helo/jet) users in a round tend to get more points than the guys running around on foot. At least in IO mode there is a good spread of points and its a more level playing field. And in no way can you compare an AK whore to a MI-28/AH-1Z whore, Snake

And lets face it, vehicles has always had an on-going problem with vehicle whores.

I think it would work better with IO.

IO on Songhua was always interesting.

M.O.A.B wrote:

IO on Songhua was always interesting.

idd, Should put that on

Played bf2 for a couple of hours tonigth with some friends and I seem to have goten a bit back into it..

Will try to get some clanmates and other people to join me and try to populate server later tonight

But first, food... 1 person on server atm, someone help him

^ is why every one hates bf2s, play the game not moan about it.

baggs wrote:

And in no way can you compare an AK whore to a MI-28/AH-1Z whore, Snake

And lets face it, vehicles has always had an on-going problem with vehicle whores.

I think I just did The point is, there is nothing different between a player who kills all round with a Havok and a player who kills all round with an AK: the only difference is the manner of the kill.
Granted, the havok can be a pain in the ass to take out (unleash the HMG's on the hummers tbh..rips it up), but then so are medics who spam medpacks everywhere! I regard myself as a vehicle whore, but only 58% of my 80k kills (on my only account) are from vehicles

Tis like marmite: you either love it or hate it.

usmarine wrote:

snake, i dont think you get what i truly mean.

i left vehicle maps for some very good reasons.  they are very annoying.  for example, say you have 20 players on each side.  well, good chance at least 5 to 10 of them will be around the main the whole time waiting for "their" vehicle.  notice "their."  that is my other point.  then you have people on the same team crying and moaning like some kids in a sandbox over who gets to play with the toy next.  and if FF is on...forget about.  just take what i said and you can multiply those issues by two.

Granted, thats true about "their vehicle", which is why the game has scaled maps - not that any of us have played anything other than 64 size The larger the map, the more vehicles there are, so if theres not even half the amount of players (i.e. 20 players in a 64size map): guess where they all will be. Full 64man servers on maps like Songhua/FuShe, etc, see a lot of good infantry work. Yes, they can end up getting less points, it depends how effective the AT-teams are. I know I often get raped when in said tank/apc in that situation. Generally, those servers are when it all works well. As long as its not on Wake, of course.
Personally, I've always thought that killing enemy armour/helis/jets from the ground should yield more points to the killer to balance out the leaderboards in a round. But at the end of the day: who really cares about points? I like to come top as much as the next person, I don't cry if I don't, because its playing and enjoying the game that's important.

M.O.A.B wrote:

And most importantly, don't take it seriously.

Whoops

Oisín | Irishpride wrote:

usmarine wrote:

snake, i dont think you get what i truly mean.

i left vehicle maps for some very good reasons.  they are very annoying.  for example, say you have 20 players on each side.  well, good chance at least 5 to 10 of them will be around the main the whole time waiting for "their" vehicle.  notice "their."  that is my other point.  then you have people on the same team crying and moaning like some kids in a sandbox over who gets to play with the toy next.  and if FF is on...forget about.  just take what i said and you can multiply those issues by two.

Wrong.

You are playing in the wrong servers.

baggs wrote:

Oh yeah totally, i'm not refuting the fact that people can do what they want. But round after round of the same people spamming tanks/jets/helos etc....just gets a bit shite. Add to that the scenario when you reach a flag and BOOOOOOM arty on your face blah blah blah.

And i think the point that Marine said about points whoring, in general, vehicle (tank/helo/jet) users in a round tend to get more points than the guys running around on foot. At least in IO mode there is a good spread of points and its a more level playing field. And in no way can you compare an AK whore to a MI-28/AH-1Z whore, Snake

And lets face it, vehicles has always had an on-going problem with vehicle whores.

Learn to play conquest then. Adapt to the map, adapt to the circumstances that have been brought upon you. Use your brain, pick the right kits, make the right decisions and stop crying about conquest, and then, perhaps then, you will have experienced the real Battlefield 2.

Also: We all know IO takes more skill and brain usage (at public level) right?

http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u288 … 987001.jpg

...

/facedesk

Oisín | Irishpride wrote:

usmarine wrote:

snake, i dont think you get what i truly mean.

i left vehicle maps for some very good reasons.  they are very annoying.  for example, say you have 20 players on each side.  well, good chance at least 5 to 10 of them will be around the main the whole time waiting for "their" vehicle.  notice "their."  that is my other point.  then you have people on the same team crying and moaning like some kids in a sandbox over who gets to play with the toy next.  and if FF is on...forget about.  just take what i said and you can multiply those issues by two.

Wrong.

You are playing in the wrong servers.

baggs wrote:

Oh yeah totally, i'm not refuting the fact that people can do what they want. But round after round of the same people spamming tanks/jets/helos etc....just gets a bit shite. Add to that the scenario when you reach a flag and BOOOOOOM arty on your face blah blah blah.

And i think the point that Marine said about points whoring, in general, vehicle (tank/helo/jet) users in a round tend to get more points than the guys running around on foot. At least in IO mode there is a good spread of points and its a more level playing field. And in no way can you compare an AK whore to a MI-28/AH-1Z whore, Snake

And lets face it, vehicles has always had an on-going problem with vehicle whores.

Learn to play conquest then. Adapt to the map, adapt to the circumstances that have been brought upon you. Use your brain, pick the right kits, make the right decisions and stop crying about conquest, and then, perhaps then, you will have experienced the real Battlefield 2.

Also: We all know IO takes more skill and brain usage (at public level) right?

http://i171.photobucket.com/albums/u288 … 987001.jpg

...

Im also guessing everyone has to be a medic or k/b ?

Well, I'm going on server in a few mins.. join