Pages: 1 … 44 45 46 47 48 … 64
this.Spoonfed_Commando wrote:
...AND have a more powerful chain gun.
If you could aim you could take a jet out in about half a second and a chopper in not much longer.Spoonfed_Commando wrote:
They need to increase the effectiveness of the Essex AA gun. It's useless against jets and choppers.
lol, or not.The AA should have a larger lock on range than a choppers TVG Missile
WAT?! If I can't play SF after 1.5 release then I'm gonna cry.HaiBai wrote:
Battlefield 2 v1.50 in 2-3 Weeks
There are some things the tidy up before final like the inability to play Special Forces.
If 1.5 is not going to fix any SF issues (as there are many bugs there too) they are NUTZ!Im_Dooomed wrote:
WAT?! If I can't play SF after 1.5 release then I'm gonna cry.HaiBai wrote:
Battlefield 2 v1.50 in 2-3 Weeks
There are some things the tidy up before final like the inability to play Special Forces.
Why do you think carrier raping happens on a frequent basis?...cause there isnt anything to effectively STOP a rape on the carrierDrunkFace wrote:
If you could aim you could take a jet out in about half a second and a chopper in not much longer.Spoonfed_Commando wrote:
They need to increase the effectiveness of the Essex AA gun. It's useless against jets and choppers.lol, or not.The AA should have a larger lock on range than a choppers TVG Missile
It doesn't need more range, just slightly more power... and I mean only slightly.Spoonfed_Commando wrote:
Why do you think carrier raping happens on a frequent basis?...cause there isnt anything to effectively STOP a rape on the carrierDrunkFace wrote:
If you could aim you could take a jet out in about half a second and a chopper in not much longer.Spoonfed_Commando wrote:
They need to increase the effectiveness of the Essex AA gun. It's useless against jets and choppers.lol, or not.The AA should have a larger lock on range than a choppers TVG Missile
A number of reasons.Spoonfed_Commando wrote:
Why do you think carrier raping happens on a frequent basis?...cause there isnt anything to effectively STOP a rape on the carrierDrunkFace wrote:
If you could aim you could take a jet out in about half a second and a chopper in not much longer.Spoonfed_Commando wrote:
They need to increase the effectiveness of the Essex AA gun. It's useless against jets and choppers.lol, or not.The AA should have a larger lock on range than a choppers TVG Missile
Last edited by H3RB4L ABU53 (2009-07-25 05:42:25)
From that note it looks like 1 guy has being doing the patch !JdeFalconr wrote:
Ooh I'm interested in the widescreen part. A wider field of view? Yes please. Glad I have a second monitor nowHaiBai wrote:
Battlefield 2 v1.50 Status Update
In a thread on the EA UK Forums, DICE Associate Producer, Barrie Tingle posted some additional information on the release of the Battlefield 2 v1.50 final patch.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hey guys
I have been out of the office (although it doesnt mean I stopped working on BF2 1.50) for the last two weeks on semester. However... Emil hasn't and has been hard at work on the update after your feedback. So here is where we are at; there hasn't been any MAJOR issues in the Beta 3 that we have had reports of.
So whats changed since the Beta 3 started?
The screens below will help explain.
- Black cross hair on the TV guided missiles
- Widescreen FoV on widescreen resolutions
When I get back into the office next week there will be some last minute checks (no more fixes (unless something is broken that I didnt expect) or changes) and all being well the update 1.50 will be finalised and released officially.
Thanks for your feedback during the Beta phases. Its all gone a long way to make this one of the biggest changelogs that Battlefield 2 has had since launch.
http://i26.tinypic.com/vhanbb.jpg
http://i27.tinypic.com/2ch2rnc.jpg
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EA UK Forums
Three, I believe.Chorcai wrote:
From that note it looks like 1 guy has being doing the patch !JdeFalconr wrote:
Ooh I'm interested in the widescreen part. A wider field of view? Yes please. Glad I have a second monitor nowHaiBai wrote:
Battlefield 2 v1.50 Status Update
In a thread on the EA UK Forums, DICE Associate Producer, Barrie Tingle posted some additional information on the release of the Battlefield 2 v1.50 final patch.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Hey guys
I have been out of the office (although it doesnt mean I stopped working on BF2 1.50) for the last two weeks on semester. However... Emil hasn't and has been hard at work on the update after your feedback. So here is where we are at; there hasn't been any MAJOR issues in the Beta 3 that we have had reports of.
So whats changed since the Beta 3 started?
The screens below will help explain.
- Black cross hair on the TV guided missiles
- Widescreen FoV on widescreen resolutions
When I get back into the office next week there will be some last minute checks (no more fixes (unless something is broken that I didnt expect) or changes) and all being well the update 1.50 will be finalised and released officially.
Thanks for your feedback during the Beta phases. Its all gone a long way to make this one of the biggest changelogs that Battlefield 2 has had since launch.
http://i26.tinypic.com/vhanbb.jpg
http://i27.tinypic.com/2ch2rnc.jpg
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EA UK Forums
/rolls eyes.FFLink wrote:
Three, I believe.Chorcai wrote:
From that note it looks like 1 guy has being doing the patch !JdeFalconr wrote:
Ooh I'm interested in the widescreen part. A wider field of view? Yes please. Glad I have a second monitor now
Last edited by Chorcai (2009-07-25 06:01:51)
This is the third beta SF hasn't worked and they'd rather add in prone deviation than fix critical issues like glitching into buildings. It's like having to put a kid in the naughty corner when you have to glitch in yourself to get them out.venom6 wrote:
If 1.5 is not going to fix any SF issues (as there are many bugs there too) they are NUTZ!
looks like i saw what was comming to BF 2 when i left BF2.H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
I think this whole game is getting stupid now, I know a lot of people probably say it's stupid for years but I didn't used to think that
Last edited by H3RB4L ABU53 (2009-07-25 18:41:29)
Once again, your superior intellect and powers of clairvoyance astound us allspecialistx2324 wrote:
looks like i saw what was comming to BF 2 when i left BF2.
dont know about SF but I guess the guys who made AIX will have to do a hotfix thingy-ma-jig.H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
How come you still go on BF2 forums all time?
Why do people say they left BF2, like it's a job or something, but still regularly check the forums to check up on stuff- either you like the game or you don't- you clearly don't so why don't you go on forums of the game you haven't left?
Does anyone know if the widescreen fix in 1.5 will work for Special Forces, and mods like AIX?
It will only have a big effect on you if you prone at a range so close that you could crouch for the same effect.d4rkph03n1x wrote:
# Added Battlefield 2142 style prone deviation - Fixed (going prone will now cause reduced accuracy for a brief period the same system BF2142 uses)
Is this going to be in, because I will not play.
Last edited by Doctor Strangelove (2009-07-27 23:33:44)
This is my point exactly. They're changing the gameplay again, and this time i, and many others, couldn't be fucked to adapt to it. It's unneeded. 1.5 should be entirely bugfix, the gameplay is already well established and unchanged for over two years.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
It will only have a big effect on you if you prone at a range so close that you could crouch for the same effect.d4rkph03n1x wrote:
# Added Battlefield 2142 style prone deviation - Fixed (going prone will now cause reduced accuracy for a brief period the same system BF2142 uses)
Is this going to be in, because I will not play.
I know, I've played it. So many idiots here are hating on the prone dev without even seeing how it's implemented.
It's not like in 2142 where it takes like 5 seconds to correct, it takes at most .5 seconds to go away (much shorter for most weapons), so it really only prevents people from dropping to the floor in CQC, it will hardly affect long distance engagements unless you have hacks or something.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ywb-NR9vG40
As you can see, only really noticeable on the assault rifles.
Lolvenom6 wrote:
Yes its 1.41 and i bet they dont really fixed any of this problems. Who will restore my deaths/suicides from my stats after crashes like this?
thing is a "as he said" GOOD GUNNER not missile spammer can take a plane down since the missiles at the essex srsly , they suck but the cannon has range as a sniper very good aim and wipes out a plane in bout 1 second if you hit the plane constantly during that 1 second , and for the choppers aim for the kockpit window , havnt tried how long it takes with essex but as it takes only 8 M-95 shots it shouldnt take more than a second that either.H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
Well that's why servers with no US carrier attack are good, yea the essex can blow up a jet with cannon alone in a split second, but hardly likely when the jet is actually flying, nomatter how good your aim is, in years of playing this game I don't think I've ever once been shot down by essex guns alone, so no point saying everyone is just complete shit aim with essex, if you have a good pilot, and a good essex gunner, the essex wouldn't stand a chance- a bit more range would be good to protect the carrier more, I'm not too bothered about it to be honest but would be a bonus
Last edited by thepilot91 (2009-07-28 05:26:57)
Pages: 1 … 44 45 46 47 48 … 64
