Thanks B. Actually I really want a photo of my home town on my desktop. But if I fail which shouldn't be a surprise I will defo check out your awesome stuff and pick something for my two monitors.burnzz wrote:
if you need that resolution, my flickr is always resized. my jpegs would cover that and i would gladly offer any you liked . . ..Sup wrote:
Yep I have the portable version. Hopefully my camera does support such high res., haven't checked yet!
Hey guys, just started a flickr account, going to join the group once i'm done doing everything, uploading pictures from my trip in china during the summer, i tried to choose the good ones but whatever, hope you enjoy lol!
Yaaay, welcome Don't forget to tell us your flickr username, so we can add you to the first post=NHB=Shadow wrote:
Hey guys, just started a flickr account, going to join the group once i'm done doing everything, uploading pictures from my trip in china during the summer, i tried to choose the good ones but whatever, hope you enjoy lol!
will do once i uploaded pictures!mcminty wrote:
Yaaay, welcome Don't forget to tell us your flickr username, so we can add you to the first post=NHB=Shadow wrote:
Hey guys, just started a flickr account, going to join the group once i'm done doing everything, uploading pictures from my trip in china during the summer, i tried to choose the good ones but whatever, hope you enjoy lol!
hopefully i'll be able to post videos of me playing the piano VERY BADLY LOLZ
Reminder: These are awesome.
http://digital-photography-school.com/1 … serscripts
Make sure you install greasemonkey for Firefox first.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748
http://digital-photography-school.com/1 … serscripts
Make sure you install greasemonkey for Firefox first.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748
Xbone Stormsurgezz
that's just great - my FF just closed down. oh hey, it's a restart, nm.Kmarion wrote:
Reminder: These are awesome.
http://digital-photography-school.com/1 … serscripts
Make sure you install greasemonkey for Firefox first.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/748
I sent a few home theater pictures to the group. Nothing special photography wise (some were taken awgile ago).. thought I'd share some of my other toys.
Forgot to shoot my sub .
October 15th - November 15th the assignment will be low light.. use your imagination and interpret however you like.
That will shake things up .
Forgot to shoot my sub .
October 15th - November 15th the assignment will be low light.. use your imagination and interpret however you like.
That will shake things up .
Xbone Stormsurgezz
i like it. imma run out and get a high ISO body - j/k, i think my 450d can cut it . . .
So I got this one then. Now I just need to learn use it properly.
Trial and error.. trial and error. We are fortunate to live in a time that lets us do this without film/development cost!Ultrafunkula wrote:
So I got this one then. Now I just need to learn use it properly.
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6900/sigma.jpg
On an unrelated note:
Nikon D3s leaked by UK press, expected to ship December with impressive ISO range, £4,200 price tag.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/niko … -with-imp/
Xbone Stormsurgezz
a co-worker rented a 1.4x, a 2.8 300mm, and a D3 last weekend for club day.Kmarion wrote:
On an unrelated note:
Nikon D3s leaked by UK press, expected to ship December with impressive ISO range, £4,200 price tag.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/niko … -with-imp/
I like the D3's. If I wasn't so committed to Canon at this point I would consider it. I've been looking at some 5d Mark II's on ebay .burnzz wrote:
a co-worker rented a 1.4x, a 2.8 300mm, and a D3 last weekend for club day.Kmarion wrote:
On an unrelated note:
Nikon D3s leaked by UK press, expected to ship December with impressive ISO range, £4,200 price tag.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/niko … -with-imp/
Xbone Stormsurgezz
my wife just asked me the difference between a 5d and a 5dmkII. i said "about a thousand dollars." fFFFFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-Kmarion wrote:
I like the D3's. If I wasn't so committed to Canon at this point I would consider it. I've been looking at some 5d Mark II's on ebay .burnzz wrote:
a co-worker rented a 1.4x, a 2.8 300mm, and a D3 last weekend for club day.Kmarion wrote:
On an unrelated note:
Nikon D3s leaked by UK press, expected to ship December with impressive ISO range, £4,200 price tag.
http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/13/niko … -with-imp/
lol..
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I might be going to zooboo Saturday night. I thinking low light might be on the menu. It will be a challenge to be sure.
bf2slowlight is the tag btw
bf2slowlight is the tag btw
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Trial and error? I'm not on to your brainwaves on this one. Explainnnn. Or draw a picture. Or sing?Kmarion wrote:
Trial and error.. trial and error. We are fortunate to live in a time that lets us do this without film/development cost!Ultrafunkula wrote:
So I got this one then. Now I just need to learn use it properly.
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6900/sigma.jpg
you've got a big aperture on that new lense.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Trial and error? I'm not on to your brainwaves on this one. Explainnnn. Or draw a picture. Or sing?
you have flash memory instead of film.
take the same picture, changing only the aperture size, and see where the sweet spot is.
oh, and pics or didn't . . .
i really want a lens for low light - esp for shows - to take pics without a flash in low light and them to turn out sharp
and for stars at night i cant imagine a 2.X or so with a 30 sec exposure at night *drool*
my wide to tele(18-200 Quantaray) goes down to 3.5 and i've gotten good results with tripod for landscapes at night... but not at concerts.
i want more daddy!
a good wide angle with big ap is in my dreams. Nikon just came out with a AF-S DX-NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED lens. om nom.
i have the older wide angle zoom - AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED - i love that lens but not enough for low light on avg
any recs? mebbe i should just get a 50mm standard type. hrm.
and for stars at night i cant imagine a 2.X or so with a 30 sec exposure at night *drool*
my wide to tele(18-200 Quantaray) goes down to 3.5 and i've gotten good results with tripod for landscapes at night... but not at concerts.
i want more daddy!
a good wide angle with big ap is in my dreams. Nikon just came out with a AF-S DX-NIKKOR 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED lens. om nom.
i have the older wide angle zoom - AF-S DX Zoom-NIKKOR 12-24mm f/4G IF-ED - i love that lens but not enough for low light on avg
any recs? mebbe i should just get a 50mm standard type. hrm.
Last edited by Kimmmmmmmmmmmm (2009-10-14 10:08:55)
I still know dick about this stuff, but as I was scoping for that lens I bought I happened to remember that I know a guy from the hockey arena where I was working at my spare time. This guy shoots hockey, footie, your yankee-doodle-dandy-football and some concerts. So anyways he told me that f2.8 is basically a recommended minimum at a hockey game for decent pix. I bought the one a tad above and I'm gonna take it for a test drive during the weekend. I'ma take pix with the basic 18-55 lens at the hockey game also so there's something to compare with.
The best way to learn is to get out there and do it! ..lol.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Trial and error? I'm not on to your brainwaves on this one. Explainnnn. Or draw a picture. Or sing?Kmarion wrote:
Trial and error.. trial and error. We are fortunate to live in a time that lets us do this without film/development cost!Ultrafunkula wrote:
So I got this one then. Now I just need to learn use it properly.
http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/6900/sigma.jpg
Well, people learn differently. Trial and error is the best way for me (and photography) at least.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Oo, ok. Thought you was saying I made a bad buy instead of a best buyKmarion wrote:
The best way to learn is to get out there and do it! ..lol.Ultrafunkula wrote:
Trial and error? I'm not on to your brainwaves on this one. Explainnnn. Or draw a picture. Or sing?Kmarion wrote:
Trial and error.. trial and error. We are fortunate to live in a time that lets us do this without film/development cost!
Well, people learn differently. Trial and error is the best way for me (and photography) at least.
Ohh, you now have a 70-200 f/2.8 lens. Nice!
Lol @ the trial and error thing.. yeaaah, there would have to be 10-15,000 photos I've taken that NO ONE will ever see cause they were just so crap
Lol @ the trial and error thing.. yeaaah, there would have to be 10-15,000 photos I've taken that NO ONE will ever see cause they were just so crap
Thar we go. Pics added. So I took 1557 photos tonight. I deleted 1000 of them in the first sitting and that was the worst only. Poor quality stuff still there but hell if I'm continuing going through them. Been doing that for 2h now. Trial and error indeed... All in all I'm very satisfied since this was my first session with the new lens and first time taking pics with that camera at a hockeygame.
Sleep. Now.
Sleep. Now.
Last edited by Ultrafunkula (2009-10-16 15:38:08)
got some great pics there funk!
Just set up my Flickr, gonna have to wait 'till I get my laptop charger back to upload some photos though