Assalam alaikumKmarion wrote:
Possibly one of Mark Wahlberg's worst films imo .Beduin wrote:
Four brothers 8/10 - living la vida loca lol
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
This cracks me up every timeBeduin wrote:
Assalam alaikumKmarion wrote:
Possibly one of Mark Wahlberg's worst films imo .Beduin wrote:
Four brothers 8/10 - living la vida loca lol
Where the Wild Things Are - 9/10
Wonderfully subtle film, beautifully shot with amazing acting. The identities of each of the monsters are realized extremely well, and the whole movie depicts a tad bit bleak but realistic view of all the aspects of childhood for Max, the main character.
Wonderfully subtle film, beautifully shot with amazing acting. The identities of each of the monsters are realized extremely well, and the whole movie depicts a tad bit bleak but realistic view of all the aspects of childhood for Max, the main character.
It's really that good? I read about it back when Jonze had it in production and i was feeling excited about it then. Very much looking forward to seeing it.Marconius wrote:
Where the Wild Things Are - 9/10
Wonderfully subtle film, beautifully shot with amazing acting. The identities of each of the monsters are realized extremely well, and the whole movie depicts a tad bit bleak but realistic view of all the aspects of childhood for Max, the main character.
Good Will Hunting
8/10
8/10
I know fucking karate
Forgetting Sarah Marshall 3/10
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
The penis right?Beduin wrote:
Forgetting Sarah Marshall 3/10
I'm scared about watching this because I loved the book. I almost always end up pissed off with films of books I like.Marconius wrote:
Where the Wild Things Are - 9/10
Wonderfully subtle film, beautifully shot with amazing acting. The identities of each of the monsters are realized extremely well, and the whole movie depicts a tad bit bleak but realistic view of all the aspects of childhood for Max, the main character.
This is a great example of one of those films - another is Fantastic Mr Fox which will be out soon (and which some of my friends did the puppets for) but I am worried that it looks too clean and doesn't have enough of a Quentin Blake feel to it.
The Last Samurai 9/10
District 9, 8/10
Despite being slated by some mates I watched it anyway. I thought it was really good (pig cannon FTW).
Despite being slated by some mates I watched it anyway. I thought it was really good (pig cannon FTW).
I Am Legend - 6/10
blah
blah
A Civil Action
7/10
7/10
I know fucking karate
Did you watch the theatrical version or the dvd release?Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
I Am Legend - 6/10
blah
The endings - they are the different!
it was on HBO HD last fridayAussieReaper wrote:
Did you watch the theatrical version or the dvd release?Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
I Am Legend - 6/10
blah
The endings - they are the different!
it ended with him sacrificing himself lolz and the lady n kid living..
The alternate ending is Spoiler (highlight to read):Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
it was on HBO HD last fridayAussieReaper wrote:
Did you watch the theatrical version or the dvd release?Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
I Am Legend - 6/10
blah
The endings - they are the different!
it ended with him sacrificing himself lolz and the lady n kid living..
more of a happy "everybody lives" scenario, but well worth watching cause there's a few extra scenes with it that make sense.
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
/10
That one is feckin awesome !! Better than any other X-Men movie. Action, story, humor. It got it all.
/10
That one is feckin awesome !! Better than any other X-Men movie. Action, story, humor. It got it all.
It's still an absolute shit movie. Only held together by Will Smiths performance.AussieReaper wrote:
The alternate ending is Spoiler (highlight to read):Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
it was on HBO HD last fridayAussieReaper wrote:
Did you watch the theatrical version or the dvd release?
The endings - they are the different!
it ended with him sacrificing himself lolz and the lady n kid living..
more of a happy "everybody lives" scenario, but well worth watching cause there's a few extra scenes with it that make sense.
Late last Saturday on TV, 007 - For Your Eyes Only: 5.5/10
One of the worse 007 movies, with the only good part being the intro (Blofelds death by helicopter/wheelchair/chimney-combo). The movie should be regarded as filler material between good James Bond Movies (Moonraker and Octopussy), just as E.g. On Her Majesty's Secret Service (Between You Only Live Twice and Diamonds Are Forever) and Thunderball (After Goldfinger, before the aforementioned YOLT).
Roger Moore is generally an OK James Bond, he's got nothing on Sean Connery, but he beats Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan 6-0. In this movie however, his acting efforts were below par. Perhaps he needs a good adversary to be a good Bond (Christopher Walken, Christopher Lee) or a hot and unforgettable Bond-chick (E.g. Solitaire (Jane Seymour).
Lacking in a charismatic Bond, a good Bond-chick, the bad-guy archetype, a decent soundtrack, good punchlines and Q:s gadgets, it's just filler.
One of the worse 007 movies, with the only good part being the intro (Blofelds death by helicopter/wheelchair/chimney-combo). The movie should be regarded as filler material between good James Bond Movies (Moonraker and Octopussy), just as E.g. On Her Majesty's Secret Service (Between You Only Live Twice and Diamonds Are Forever) and Thunderball (After Goldfinger, before the aforementioned YOLT).
Roger Moore is generally an OK James Bond, he's got nothing on Sean Connery, but he beats Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan 6-0. In this movie however, his acting efforts were below par. Perhaps he needs a good adversary to be a good Bond (Christopher Walken, Christopher Lee) or a hot and unforgettable Bond-chick (E.g. Solitaire (Jane Seymour).
Lacking in a charismatic Bond, a good Bond-chick, the bad-guy archetype, a decent soundtrack, good punchlines and Q:s gadgets, it's just filler.
I need around tree fiddy.
Idiocracy
6.5/10
lulzy, but lame
6.5/10
lulzy, but lame
noice 
I wat'dDonFck wrote:
Roger Moore is generally an OK James Bond, he's got nothing on Sean Connery, but he beats Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan 6-0. In this movie however, his acting efforts were below par.
Pierce iz da man. Sean is the JB. Who is Dalton. Moore is okay, Id rate the actors as Sean>Pierce>Roger>Timmy.
Although Moore does have that classyness about him that Pierce doesnt, but Pierce just has that awesomeness about him.
noice
Pierce is too syrupy imo.KuSTaV wrote:
I wat'dDonFck wrote:
Roger Moore is generally an OK James Bond, he's got nothing on Sean Connery, but he beats Timothy Dalton and Pierce Brosnan 6-0. In this movie however, his acting efforts were below par.
Pierce iz da man. Sean is the JB. Who is Dalton. Moore is okay, Id rate the actors as Sean>Pierce>Roger>Timmy.
Although Moore does have that classyness about him that Pierce doesnt, but Pierce just has that awesomeness about him.
I guess my rating would be: Sean->Daniel->Roger->Timmy->Pierce->George.
I need around tree fiddy.
You'd out Daniel Craig above Pierce?
Tbh, although Quantum of Solace was good, it wasn't because of Daniel. Yeah, he's a good actor, but he isn't that good as a Bond.
Sean is the classic, everybody knows that, but of the modern bonds, Pierce wins hands down. Granted, he's a bit syrupy and stuff, but he somewhow manages to charm the audience whilst still kicking ass.
Roger Moore is great.... at times. He had his Bond moments and others were pretty fail. If you ask me, Pierce was pretty consistent.
I think it goes like this:
Sean > Pierce = Roger > Daniel > Timmy > George
Tbh, although Quantum of Solace was good, it wasn't because of Daniel. Yeah, he's a good actor, but he isn't that good as a Bond.
Sean is the classic, everybody knows that, but of the modern bonds, Pierce wins hands down. Granted, he's a bit syrupy and stuff, but he somewhow manages to charm the audience whilst still kicking ass.
Roger Moore is great.... at times. He had his Bond moments and others were pretty fail. If you ask me, Pierce was pretty consistent.
I think it goes like this:
Sean > Pierce = Roger > Daniel > Timmy > George
Your arguments make sense. But I still wouldn't put Pierce that high up, he'd still be after Timmy and Daniel.
I need around tree fiddy.
I thought Quantum of Solace was downright terrible . Biggest letdown in years.Zimmer wrote:
Tbh, although Quantum of Solace was good, it wasn't because of Daniel. Yeah, he's a good actor, but he isn't that good as a Bond.
Also I like Pierce and Daniel.
Oh, sorry, I meant Casino Royale. Got them both mixed up. Yeah, QoS was utter shit.