lolMekstizzle wrote:
American mainstream media is way too polarised and opinionated. What's the point of being a right wing guy who only watches Fox, or a left wing guy who only watches CNN or whatever. What's the point of having a media, that you simply want to just sit there, be spoonfed something that you'll know you are likely to agree with.
Oh my good lord.m3thod wrote:
never had it. I suspect i am not missing much.
none near my house.m3thod wrote:
fap under a sequoia.
youre nuts. i would check the bbc everyday and it sucked obama dry. pffft. keep fooling yourselves.Mekstizzle wrote:
Over here the organisations are much less biased/opinionated/polarised than over there. You do get all of that, but it's much less pronounced. Even the crappy populist nonsense like The Sun newspaper, they switch political allegiance all the time, but that's usually because they always take the popularist stance.
The Beeb is getting steadily worse in its bias, its no neutral ground these days and you can tell it has a political agenda at times.m3thod wrote:
BBC
A shining bastion of impartiality in a ocean of lies and deciet. You'll do well to learn from Auntie.
It's nowhere near as bad as how shit is over in the US. You're just saying that because it's natural for you, being against Obama to instantly pick up and exaggerate anything that would piss you off like that. Especially when you want to put it forward as an argument, really there's nothing I can say about that except it's no surprise you say that.11 Bravo wrote:
youre nuts. i would check the bbc everyday and it sucked obama dry. pffft. keep fooling yourselves.Mekstizzle wrote:
Over here the organisations are much less biased/opinionated/polarised than over there. You do get all of that, but it's much less pronounced. Even the crappy populist nonsense like The Sun newspaper, they switch political allegiance all the time, but that's usually because they always take the popularist stance.
Last edited by Mekstizzle (2010-01-30 12:21:08)
have fun getting lostandrooz wrote:
im going on a hike today. where? idk. i will explore the mountains near my house and enjoy mother nature.
Mekstizzle wrote:
It's nowhere near as bad as how shit is over in the US. You're just saying that because it's natural for you, being against Obama to instantly pick up and exaggerate anything that would piss you off like that. Especially when you want to put it forward as an argument, really there's nothing I can say about that except it's no surprise you say that.11 Bravo wrote:
youre nuts. i would check the bbc everyday and it sucked obama dry. pffft. keep fooling yourselves.Mekstizzle wrote:
Over here the organisations are much less biased/opinionated/polarised than over there. You do get all of that, but it's much less pronounced. Even the crappy populist nonsense like The Sun newspaper, they switch political allegiance all the time, but that's usually because they always take the popularist stance.
I think the BBC is getting less biased. It used to be more left wing than it is these days
you know nothing mek. you are just a sheep when it comes to that. you watch fox do ya? how can you even argue. at least i watch both bbc and fox equally.M.O.A.B wrote:
The Beeb is getting steadily worse in its bias, its no neutral ground these days and you can tell it has a political agenda at times.
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-01-30 12:25:45)
Last edited by Mekstizzle (2010-01-30 12:30:07)
nah, its a high desert type terrain. no big trees or anything. not like the back country in canada, lulz.krazed wrote:
have fun getting lostandrooz wrote:
im going on a hike today. where? idk. i will explore the mountains near my house and enjoy mother nature.
unless you live in a suburb and the "mountains" are a well marked well known trail
she must have serious back pain
...shouldn't she have visible nipples? Based on that I'll say ALLLIIIEEENNN TIITTTSSS!.
i quote him because he watches it more than me and prolly as much as you yet has a different view. people like you say it like fact "fox bad. bbc best fucking thing eva!"Mekstizzle wrote:
It's much less than other places. He probably gets his opinions from the Daily Mail, because they're always sprouting on about how unbiased shit is. You can easily tell over here when someone is getting their opinions from the Daily Hate. There's much better on offer over here than the tabloids. Overall the US media is more like our tabloids, than our proper media. But that's because your media is much more business orientated than ours.
You quote this guy and act like it's the final word, even when I myself said that I reckon it's becoming less biased than it was before. So who are you gonna believe, probably him, seeing as you usually agree with him. This is what I mean, it's all bullshit at the end of the day. No point in even bothering.
You call me a sheep when you take MOAB's word as an argument to what I said. Ok then. You even use his quote so much that you say I know nothing, how does that even make fucking sense.
I've seen Fox, I've seen Fox News. I use the BBC, Telegraph, Guardian. Fox is more akin to The Sun/Daily Mail. Sensationalist, headlines, business media, all that.
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-01-30 12:42:38)
I think i can see some!Pochsy wrote:
...shouldn't she have visible nipples? Based on that I'll say ALLLIIIEEENNN TIITTTSSS!.
that is a peanutPrivateVendetta wrote:
I think i can see some!Pochsy wrote:
...shouldn't she have visible nipples? Based on that I'll say ALLLIIIEEENNN TIITTTSSS!.
Bottom right of right titty
