Bevo
Nah
+718|6779|Austin, Texas
Zeek/minty, what would you call a "moderate" solution? Kind of baffling to think a $200 card is low-end. Is it wise to spend more than the monitors on just getting output to them (via soundcard or DAC)? Keep in mind a sub is an option somewhere down the road.


@minty: Yessuh - would I simply buy two individual TRS cables for that doohickey? Looks like there's DC power so hopefully the hissing and humming won't be an issue

Last edited by Bevo (2010-08-23 13:41:14)

Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6728

Bevo wrote:

Zeek/minty, what would you call a "moderate" solution? Kind of baffling to think a $200 card is low-end. Is it wise to spend more than the monitors on just getting output to them (via soundcard or DAC)? Keep in mind a sub is an option somewhere down the road.


@minty: Yessuh - would I simply buy two individual TRS cables for that doohickey? Looks like there's DC power so hopefully the hissing and humming won't be an issue
a moderate solution for me is a firewire card with 4x inputs, minimum, preferably 8x with a separate headphone-cue outpout.

i use external, portable soundcards for DJ'ing on my macbook, so i look for more functionality/quality/power than just home-solutions.

the USB card you named is more than enough for what you need. what sub are you thinking of adding? the KRK one? it's nice.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6711|The Twilight Zone
200$ is defo low end. Usually (this doesn't always apply but mostly) you need to spend 3x as much on the equipment powering and sourcing your speakers/headphones than the speakers/headphones cost.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Bevo
Nah
+718|6779|Austin, Texas
Yes zeek, the krk 10 sub. $400 is steeeeep though so I may re-eval after my birthday passes.

As far as TRS cables go, are they all the same? Is there a thickness or type or price I should be looking at?
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6711|The Twilight Zone
50$ for a pair. You don't need to spend more.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Bevo
Nah
+718|6779|Austin, Texas
$50, jesus

Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6728
audio fidelity is serious business. if you buy the speakers you've got to back them up with the rest . otherwise you're wasting money/performance!
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|6979|Sydney, Australia

Bevo wrote:

@minty: Yessuh - would I simply buy two individual TRS cables for that doohickey? Looks like there's DC power so hopefully the hissing and humming won't be an issue
Yeah, that's all you'll need to do. It should be good!

Bevo wrote:

Yes zeek, the krk 10 sub. $400 is steeeeep
xD

The sub I'm looking at for my stereo is ~1,100AUD. Needless to say, it won't be happening for a while.. (granted I can get away without one for most music..)
Bevo
Nah
+718|6779|Austin, Texas
Yes, well, minty, I'm a college student who works 3 months out of the year on $10/hr and uses that as spending money until next summer

$400 is steep to me that's like, 60 meals yo.
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6455|Winland

You don't need to spend $50 on a pair of XLR cables, Christ. Over here, at least, I've seen mic cables go for 2€/meter, and those are more than fine for connecting a speaker. Not that there's a whole lot to gain from using such over un-balanced cables, though.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6711|The Twilight Zone
Of course you don't need to spend 50$. But I do recommend he spends that much if he's getting monitors like KRK's who deserve decent cables. Quality connectors like Neutrik cost approx 8€ (4 pieces) + 10M of cable (Mogami or Canare Starquad) is around 20€ so total of 28€ if he makes them himself or around 50€/$ if he buys them. Buying equipment worth 1k and connecting them with a pair of 2€ cables is the worst decision you can make.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6455|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Of course you don't need to spend 50$. But I do recommend he spends that much if he's getting monitors like KRK's who deserve decent cables. Quality connectors like Neutrik cost approx 8€ (4 pieces) + 10M of cable (Mogami or Canare Starquad) is around 20€ so total of 28€ if he makes them himself or around 50€/$ if he buys them. Buying equipment worth 1k and connecting them with a pair of 2€ cables is the worst decision you can make.
As long as the cables you're using are decently shielded, there is no difference in their performance. Standard-issue XLR mic cables are usually double-shielded, so they're more than adequate for line level signals to the speakers.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6711|The Twilight Zone
I've had cables costing from 10€ a pair to 100€ a pair and while there's no difference between 100€ and 50€ cables theres a huge difference between 50€ cables and 10 cables. First of all the grip is almost non existent on cheap cables with cheap connectors, second on longer runs the thinner cable looses consistency. The cable has very high capacitance and treble gets rolled off (that' something for you-specs...).

http://www.mogamicable.com/

http://www.canare.com/

This is no high end but it is high quality

https://www.canare.com/ProductItemContentImages/389.jpg
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6455|Winland

.Sup wrote:

I've had cables costing from 10€ a pair to 100€ a pair and while there's no difference between 100€ and 50€ cables theres a huge difference between 50€ cables and 10 cables. First of all the grip is almost non existent on cheap cables with cheap connectors, second on longer runs the thinner cable looses consistency. The cable has very high capacitance and treble gets rolled off (that' something for you-specs...).

http://www.mogamicable.com/

http://www.canare.com/

This is no high end but it is high quality

http://www.canare.com/ProductItemContentImages/389.jpg
While you do have a point about the connectors, I don't see how it'd be a problem if you aren't un-plugging them or moving the equipment around all the time. You also won't get any trouble with signal degradation unless you run ridiculous lengths (100+ meters) of very, very poor cable. Cable capacitance is more or less non-existent as long as you've got a properly shielded cable.

My point is, that, while it's nice having rigid cables, there's no actual performance difference between them as long as you aren't comparing to a cable you cut from a wall wart.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2010-08-24 01:53:29)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6711|The Twilight Zone
One of the cheap cables I used I had to actually plug them into another set of cables as the cheap cable didn't hold onto the connector in my KRK sub. And that's bad. And sub vibrates. If you really don't want to spend lets say more than 15€ for a pair then Thomann has decent XLR cables. In USA I very much recommend Blue jeans cable. Also I recommend XLR over TRS- its just safer.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Bevo
Nah
+718|6779|Austin, Texas

.Sup wrote:

One of the cheap cables I used I had to actually plug them into another set of cables as the cheap cable didn't hold onto the connector in my KRK sub. And that's bad. And sub vibrates. If you really don't want to spend lets say more than 15€ for a pair then Thomann has decent XLR cables. In USA I very much recommend Blue jeans cable. Also I recommend XLR over TRS- its just safer.
I wish I could use the XLRs I already have, but there's no XLR connections on this card.

Are there any cards comparable in the same price range with XLR connections?
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6728

mcminty wrote:

Bevo wrote:

@minty: Yessuh - would I simply buy two individual TRS cables for that doohickey? Looks like there's DC power so hopefully the hissing and humming won't be an issue
Yeah, that's all you'll need to do. It should be good!

Bevo wrote:

Yes zeek, the krk 10 sub. $400 is steeeeep
xD

The sub I'm looking at for my stereo is ~1,100AUD. Needless to say, it won't be happening for a while.. (granted I can get away without one for most music..)
say hello to my little friend... a bang & olufsen hi-fi
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6711|The Twilight Zone

Bevo wrote:

.Sup wrote:

One of the cheap cables I used I had to actually plug them into another set of cables as the cheap cable didn't hold onto the connector in my KRK sub. And that's bad. And sub vibrates. If you really don't want to spend lets say more than 15€ for a pair then Thomann has decent XLR cables. In USA I very much recommend Blue jeans cable. Also I recommend XLR over TRS- its just safer.
I wish I could use the XLRs I already have, but there's no XLR connections on this card.

Are there any cards comparable in the same price range with XLR connections?
For 100$? I will look into it, I personally don't know any.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Bevo
Nah
+718|6779|Austin, Texas
$200
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6711|The Twilight Zone
The only DAC with XLRs I was able to find is the LD DAC_1 but it costs 260$ new unless you buy used. You get the best for the money though. Shipping is extra so the total cost will be around 300$. Bevo you might as well go unbalanced and go balanced when you actually have money to spend. In 500$ price range there are a lot more options.


http://www.head-fi.org/forum/thread/494 … n-buy-pt-3

Last edited by .Sup (2010-08-24 13:45:46)

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6046|Catherine Black
Waste of money. The lot of it, imo.

I'm using a Creative Audigy ZS and 3.5mm splitter to my 2.1 Creative 250D, and a 3.5mm to RCA into a headphone amp then my HD 555s plug into that. Overall cost? Didn't buy the speakers or soundcard, bought the HD555s, £90. I don't need anything else. I don't need double-sheilded stiff cables, $7250 cables, external DACs, £300 sound cards, electricity cleaners, and whatever guff you audiophiles pour money into. At a point (maybe around the point I am, perhaps a bit higher) the price:improvement drops exponentially, and you're a fool for spending that much money for such little gain.

Bevo, unless you seriously want to start researching into this yourself to find what's best for you, I'd just keep what you've bought so far, get the cables you think are worth it, and make it work, then decide if you need to spend more money on it. From where I'm sitting you don't seem like such an audiophile, asking for all this help, so you'll probably not notice the difference.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6728

Finray wrote:

Waste of money. The lot of it, imo.

I'm using a Creative Audigy ZS and 3.5mm splitter to my 2.1 Creative 250D, and a 3.5mm to RCA into a headphone amp then my HD 555s plug into that. Overall cost? Didn't buy the speakers or soundcard, bought the HD555s, £90. I don't need anything else. I don't need double-sheilded stiff cables, $7250 cables, external DACs, £300 sound cards, electricity cleaners, and whatever guff you audiophiles pour money into. At a point (maybe around the point I am, perhaps a bit higher) the price:improvement drops exponentially, and you're a fool for spending that much money for such little gain.

Bevo, unless you seriously want to start researching into this yourself to find what's best for you, I'd just keep what you've bought so far, get the cables you think are worth it, and make it work, then decide if you need to spend more money on it. From where I'm sitting you don't seem like such an audiophile, asking for all this help, so you'll probably not notice the difference.
finray just because you may know shit about graphics cards, doesn't mean you know anything about audio.

audio fidelity is a much more technical, much more diverse area of technology than computer graphics.

there really IS a massive difference between bad, average, and great.

so you have a shitty audigy ZS and some average-level headphones and think you've reached the zenith of sound? HAHAHA.

finray if you could afford great audio hardware you'd probably have it. you get into little ego e-peen battles over graphics, RAM, processors and everything else so i see no reason why you would genuinely, truthfully discredit sound. the quality of sound is very important for many people-- both professionally and as a hobby. i would invite you to go to, say, a B&O shop and to listen to some movies or some music on their specialist hardware. it will blow your mind. every single piece of hardware 'colours' your sound and produces a 'signature' in your audio-- whether or not you realize it. your audigy ZS and hD555's produce for you, as far as you understand good sound quality, a 'decent' sound. but that DOES NOT MEAN there is nothing better. there are WHOLE LOADS of better sound-sources.

basically your entire post reeks of arrogance: 'oh im a tech geek but because i dont understand or have any direct experience with audio hardware, it is thus a waste of time/money for fools who would be better off buying the latest 480GTX cards so they can play their games made 5 years ago'. no. shut the fuck up and get a clue. my sound-system > yours x1000.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Bevo
Nah
+718|6779|Austin, Texas
I do notice the buzz and screeching though which is the main issue in the first place. I don't plan to spend that much more, besides the external.
Defiance
Member
+438|6929

Finray wrote:

Waste of money. The lot of it, imo.

I'm using a Creative Audigy ZS and 3.5mm splitter to my 2.1 Creative 250D, and a 3.5mm to RCA into a headphone amp then my HD 555s plug into that. Overall cost? Didn't buy the speakers or soundcard, bought the HD555s, £90. I don't need anything else. I don't need double-sheilded stiff cables, $7250 cables, external DACs, £300 sound cards, electricity cleaners, and whatever guff you audiophiles pour money into. At a point (maybe around the point I am, perhaps a bit higher) the price:improvement drops exponentially, and you're a fool for spending that much money for such little gain.
You're right, that point does exist. But, you're far from it, and you can't say your setup cost £90 when you were gifted components and you forgot to mention the headphone amp at all in your cost analysis.

Yes, I agree that those cables are a waste of money. But, a good DAC, amp, and set of headphones/speakers are critical components and warrant a slight investment if you are truly interested in getting good sound. You don't seem to be that interested, so you're fine being happy with what works for you.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6046|Catherine Black

Uzique wrote:

blah blah blah.
I never said I was at the zenith of sound, let alone near it, what I said was to get to the 'zenith of sound' would cost an insane amount, and, at least in my opinion, progressing much above what I have now is a pointless act to me. I could probably get a new sound card, maybe splash out £150 on it, and wouldn't get as much enjoyment from it as spending £150 on pints, or a new keyboard or something. What I'm saying is, when you have the basics of sound down, IE, you can hear the sound, it sounds alright, IMO there's a lot better things to spend the cash on.

Defiance wrote:

You're right, that point does exist. But, you're far from it, and you can't say your setup cost £90 when you were gifted components and you forgot to mention the headphone amp at all in your cost analysis.

Yes, I agree that those cables are a waste of money. But, a good DAC, amp, and set of headphones/speakers are critical components and warrant a slight investment if you are truly interested in getting good sound. You don't seem to be that interested, so you're fine being happy with what works for you.
I don't imagine I'm FAR from it, like I said above I'd probably get a decent mid-level sound card and then I'd be pretty close to the price:improvement sillyness.

Also I didn't mention the amp, because it's been in my family about 30 years and is a decrepit broken thing, that's probably only worth about £10 nowadays. Freezer'd still fap though.

Bevo wrote:

I do notice the buzz and screeching though which is the main issue in the first place. I don't plan to spend that much more, besides the external.
I thought that was due to dirty leccy in your laptop or something? Which can only be solved by a new powersource as an amplifier? I'm not an expert, but I don't see new cables in that?
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard