Hey John Galt, did you read Atlas Shrugged on your kindle?
lol.. I can't even imagine
lol.. I can't even imagine
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Nah. I got the kindle for christmas in december. It saved me about $1000 in text books this summer.Kmar wrote:
Hey John Galt, did you read Atlas Shrugged on your kindle?
lol.. I can't even imagine
I think you missed the point man. We're simply talking about personal enjoyability, not comprehension.Jay wrote:
It's really no different. You just have a romantic attachment to books which I got over after I realized how awesome my kindle is. Staring at a screen or a page is still the same function. The package is just different. You like books better, fine. Im already through my fourth set of floor to ceiling bookshelves in a one bedroom apartment so the kindle is a godsend space-wise.
i didn't miss the point. I enjoy the process of learning far more than the act of reading.Kmar wrote:
I think you missed the point man. We're simply talking about personal enjoyability, not comprehension.Jay wrote:
It's really no different. You just have a romantic attachment to books which I got over after I realized how awesome my kindle is. Staring at a screen or a page is still the same function. The package is just different. You like books better, fine. Im already through my fourth set of floor to ceiling bookshelves in a one bedroom apartment so the kindle is a godsend space-wise.
As if the how does not contribute to enjoyibilty? For many people it does.Jay wrote:
i didn't miss the point. I enjoy the process of learning far more than the act of reading.Kmar wrote:
I think you missed the point man. We're simply talking about personal enjoyability, not comprehension.Jay wrote:
It's really no different. You just have a romantic attachment to books which I got over after I realized how awesome my kindle is. Staring at a screen or a page is still the same function. The package is just different. You like books better, fine. Im already through my fourth set of floor to ceiling bookshelves in a one bedroom apartment so the kindle is a godsend space-wise.
what's that got to do with reading books and not wanting to be in front of a screen 24 hours a day in every single activity?burnzz wrote:
i can't wait for you bastards to grow old.
Hey that's another benifit of kindle.. you can increase the font point on the fly.burnzz wrote:
i can't wait for you bastards to grow old.
if your eyes never change, then nothing. i have a modest collection of hard bound and soft cover books, that i have a hard time reading anymore.Uzique wrote:
what's that got to do with reading books and not wanting to be in front of a screen 24 hours a day in every single activity?burnzz wrote:
i can't wait for you bastards to grow old.
I'm just indifferent about the medium, that's all. I still buy physical copies of books. It's just easier to tote around and whip out the kindle when I'm not at home.Kmar wrote:
As if the how does not contribute to enjoyibilty? For many people it does.Jay wrote:
i didn't miss the point. I enjoy the process of learning far more than the act of reading.Kmar wrote:
I think you missed the point man. We're simply talking about personal enjoyability, not comprehension.
my eyes have changed a lot in the last 5 years. it's called getting a new prescription. and, if you're going blind... i don't see how a kindle will change it.burnzz wrote:
if your eyes never change, then nothing. i have a modest collection of hard bound and soft cover books, that i have a hard time reading anymore.Uzique wrote:
what's that got to do with reading books and not wanting to be in front of a screen 24 hours a day in every single activity?burnzz wrote:
i can't wait for you bastards to grow old.
you see, your arms grow shorter as you grow older, and it get's harder to hold a book away from you . . .
You can increase the size of the typeface.Uzique wrote:
my eyes have changed a lot in the last 5 years. it's called getting a new prescription. and, if you're going blind... i don't see how a kindle will change it.burnzz wrote:
if your eyes never change, then nothing. i have a modest collection of hard bound and soft cover books, that i have a hard time reading anymore.Uzique wrote:
what's that got to do with reading books and not wanting to be in front of a screen 24 hours a day in every single activity?
you see, your arms grow shorter as you grow older, and it get's harder to hold a book away from you . . .
That's the main reason I got the kindle. For awhile I was getting my daily newspaper delivered on it. I would take it to my open houses to kill time in between showings.Jay wrote:
I'm just indifferent about the medium, that's all. I still buy physical copies of books. It's just easier to tote around and whip out the kindle when I'm not at home.Kmar wrote:
As if the how does not contribute to enjoyibilty? For many people it does.Jay wrote:
i didn't miss the point. I enjoy the process of learning far more than the act of reading.
not blind, farsighted. i quit wanking when i grew hair on my palms, but this having to hold anything you read farther away is killing me.Uzique wrote:
my eyes have changed a lot in the last 5 years. it's called getting a new prescription. and, if you're going blind... i don't see how a kindle will change it.burnzz wrote:
if your eyes never change, then nothing. i have a modest collection of hard bound and soft cover books, that i have a hard time reading anymore.Uzique wrote:
what's that got to do with reading books and not wanting to be in front of a screen 24 hours a day in every single activity?
you see, your arms grow shorter as you grow older, and it get's harder to hold a book away from you . . .
so what's a better solution to eyesight problems? get an eyetest and see everything in life 20/20, or abandon books altogether and get a kindle so you can increase the size of the written word? hmm... a compelling argument. you can also increase the size of a typeface in all of your books... it's this miraculous thing called a magnifying glass. that also worked for scholars and readers in past centuries that had similar problems reaching an opticians.Jay wrote:
You can increase the size of the typeface.Uzique wrote:
my eyes have changed a lot in the last 5 years. it's called getting a new prescription. and, if you're going blind... i don't see how a kindle will change it.burnzz wrote:
if your eyes never change, then nothing. i have a modest collection of hard bound and soft cover books, that i have a hard time reading anymore.
you see, your arms grow shorter as you grow older, and it get's harder to hold a book away from you . . .
This is going to take me a long time. Not only because of the size, but because I find myself having to pause to let it soak in.Uzique wrote:
yeah i definitely wouldn't advise buying a book of that shape or nature on a kindle - i'd hate to read it on a device! plus it's a good one to have on the bookshelf
Seems damning, but dealing with opinionated writers is nothing new. Still plan to read.When I was younger I had a vague hope that this book would spare me having to read any of the philosophers it discusses. That isn't true at all, fortunately or unfortunately. Russell has very idiosyncratic views of some philosophers, such as Epicurus, who he carelessly misrepresents, and Nietzsche, who he labels (and libels) and dismisses as a proto-Nazi.
Make sure you read the whole review. He did give it five stars.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Seems damning, but dealing with opinionated writers is nothing new. Still plan to read.When I was younger I had a vague hope that this book would spare me having to read any of the philosophers it discusses. That isn't true at all, fortunately or unfortunately. Russell has very idiosyncratic views of some philosophers, such as Epicurus, who he carelessly misrepresents, and Nietzsche, who he labels (and libels) and dismisses as a proto-Nazi.
Yeah, I saw the rating up by the summary.Kmar wrote:
Make sure you read the whole review. He did give it five stars.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Seems damning, but dealing with opinionated writers is nothing new. Still plan to read.When I was younger I had a vague hope that this book would spare me having to read any of the philosophers it discusses. That isn't true at all, fortunately or unfortunately. Russell has very idiosyncratic views of some philosophers, such as Epicurus, who he carelessly misrepresents, and Nietzsche, who he labels (and libels) and dismisses as a proto-Nazi.
If your degree is of any practical use then you probably willUzique wrote:
text you're not going to read a textbook after you finish whatever course you're doing.