A bunch of my friends went to the woman's march. 2 out of 6 were female. Those damn radical feminists.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/sta … 6288228352
Is Trump going to declare martial law less than a week into his Presidency?
If it wasn't so sad it would be funny.
Good luck my US friends. This will be a hell of a ride for 4 years.
Is Trump going to declare martial law less than a week into his Presidency?
If it wasn't so sad it would be funny.
Good luck my US friends. This will be a hell of a ride for 4 years.
Isn't the feds just federal law enforcement?AussieReaper wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/824080766288228352
Is Trump going to declare martial law less than a week into his Presidency?
If it wasn't so sad it would be funny.
Good luck my US friends. This will be a hell of a ride for 4 years.
If he meant federal law-enforcement authorities rather than federal troops, the law enforcement agencies administered by the Department of Justice include:
United States Marshal Service.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
Drug Enforcement Administration.
Office of Inspector General.
Which of those would he actually be referring to? He's going to send in the FBI? lol
United States Marshal Service.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
Drug Enforcement Administration.
Office of Inspector General.
Which of those would he actually be referring to? He's going to send in the FBI? lol
AussieReaper wrote:
Good luck my US friends. This will be a hell of a ride for 4 years.
- SuperJail Warden
- Gone Forever
- +644|3985
I look forward to telling my grand children I can remember the start of the Great Chicago Uprising.
maybeh DEA and ATF.AussieReaper wrote:
If he meant federal law-enforcement authorities rather than federal troops, the law enforcement agencies administered by the Department of Justice include:
United States Marshal Service.
Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Federal Bureau of Prisons.
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.
Drug Enforcement Administration.
Office of Inspector General.
Which of those would he actually be referring to? He's going to send in the FBI? lol
Trump ordered certain national park services to halt Twitter operations after they posted the picture of the two inaugurations. Is this how the censorship starts?
Only in the post-truth world.pirana6 wrote:
I hate him as much as the next guy but those are very general statements you can make about political view or affiliation.
Yes, yes it is.Trump ordered certain national park services to halt Twitter operations after they posted the picture of the two inaugurations. Is this how the censorship starts?
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2017-01-24 22:58:09)
Fuck Israel
Hmm maybe 'woman's march' is a misnomer, it should be 'stupid angry hipster's march'KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
A bunch of my friends went to the woman's march. 2 out of 6 were female. Those damn radical feminists.
Fuck Israel
The more I look at this Trump comedy, the more I think that he's a scapegoat specifically prepared to take blame for something radical planned for USA by the part of their elite that put him in The White House. Something that, in their opinion, cannot be put off any longer but is impossible to sell to the public as necessary and unavoidable.
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
naw hes a russian plant dont ya know.Shahter wrote:
The more I look at this Trump comedy, the more I think that he's a scapegoat specifically prepared to take blame for something radical planned for USA by the part of their elite that put him in The White House. Something that, in their opinion, cannot be put off any longer but is impossible to sell to the public as necessary and unavoidable.
YesCybargs wrote:
Isn't the feds just federal law enforcement?AussieReaper wrote:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/824080766288228352
Is Trump going to declare martial law less than a week into his Presidency?
If it wasn't so sad it would be funny.
Good luck my US friends. This will be a hell of a ride for 4 years.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
National parks shouldn't be political imopirana6 wrote:
Trump ordered certain national park services to halt Twitter operations after they posted the picture of the two inaugurations. Is this how the censorship starts?
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
hahaShahter wrote:
The more I look at this Trump comedy, the more I think that he's a scapegoat specifically prepared to take blame for something radical planned for USA by the part of their elite that put him in The White House. Something that, in their opinion, cannot be put off any longer but is impossible to sell to the public as necessary and unavoidable.
- SuperJail Warden
- Gone Forever
- +644|3985
Maybe the Trump regime will fall and the U.S. gets an authoritarian left wing government for awhile. What we need is a man of steel to force healthcare and free college education on poor republicans.
You're right, they probably shouldn't. They should stick to national park-ing and the single employees should vote how they see fit.Jay wrote:
National parks shouldn't be political imopirana6 wrote:
Trump ordered certain national park services to halt Twitter operations after they posted the picture of the two inaugurations. Is this how the censorship starts?
That being said, why does the president get a say in what they post on their twitter? If their boss doesn't like it, and it's 'work' related, fire them and the world should continue to spin. The president shouldn't get to decide what every single US department, large and small, says on their twitter. That's dipping into fascism territory.
Right, but all government agencies have been moving that way for decades. Here's an open letter to Obama complaining about all communications being directed through PR:pirana6 wrote:
You're right, they probably shouldn't. They should stick to national park-ing and the single employees should vote how they see fit.Jay wrote:
National parks shouldn't be political imopirana6 wrote:
Trump ordered certain national park services to halt Twitter operations after they posted the picture of the two inaugurations. Is this how the censorship starts?
That being said, why does the president get a say in what they post on their twitter? If their boss doesn't like it, and it's 'work' related, fire them and the world should continue to spin. The president shouldn't get to decide what every single US department, large and small, says on their twitter. That's dipping into fascism territory.
http://spj.org/pdf/news/obama-letter-final-08102015.pdf
Our government agencies are supposed to be apolitical. It's the primary reason they have jobs for life, it's supposed to be a professional service that rises above politics.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
what happens if, for e.g., scientific agencies or national parks want to share their research findings w/r/t global warming, which does not tally with trump's team's PR message about global warming?Jay wrote:
Right, but all government agencies have been moving that way for decades. Here's an open letter to Obama complaining about all communications being directed through PR:pirana6 wrote:
You're right, they probably shouldn't. They should stick to national park-ing and the single employees should vote how they see fit.Jay wrote:
National parks shouldn't be political imo
That being said, why does the president get a say in what they post on their twitter? If their boss doesn't like it, and it's 'work' related, fire them and the world should continue to spin. The president shouldn't get to decide what every single US department, large and small, says on their twitter. That's dipping into fascism territory.
http://spj.org/pdf/news/obama-letter-final-08102015.pdf
Our government agencies are supposed to be apolitical. It's the primary reason they have jobs for life, it's supposed to be a professional service that rises above politics.
I imagine the research will still be published. I dunno. My point was that what trump's admin did wasn't out of the ordinary. The national park twitter account was in the wrong.uziq wrote:
what happens if, for e.g., scientific agencies or national parks want to share their research findings w/r/t global warming, which does not tally with trump's team's PR message about global warming?Jay wrote:
Right, but all government agencies have been moving that way for decades. Here's an open letter to Obama complaining about all communications being directed through PR:pirana6 wrote:
You're right, they probably shouldn't. They should stick to national park-ing and the single employees should vote how they see fit.
That being said, why does the president get a say in what they post on their twitter? If their boss doesn't like it, and it's 'work' related, fire them and the world should continue to spin. The president shouldn't get to decide what every single US department, large and small, says on their twitter. That's dipping into fascism territory.
http://spj.org/pdf/news/obama-letter-final-08102015.pdf
Our government agencies are supposed to be apolitical. It's the primary reason they have jobs for life, it's supposed to be a professional service that rises above politics.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
- SuperJail Warden
- Gone Forever
- +644|3985
It is interesting that there are so many poor Americans who vote republican and hate the idea of government assistance. Even if their lives depended on it like it does with the ACA.
What do we do with these people? I believe in helping all of God's creatures including these people. At some point I wonder if we should just let them literally kill themselves off. Like I spent the last 8 years advocating education and healthcare for these people but it is obvious they don't want to help themselves.
What do we do with these people? I believe in helping all of God's creatures including these people. At some point I wonder if we should just let them literally kill themselves off. Like I spent the last 8 years advocating education and healthcare for these people but it is obvious they don't want to help themselves.
what if they want to publicise it on twitter?Jay wrote:
I imagine the research will still be published. I dunno. My point was that what trump's admin did wasn't out of the ordinary. The national park twitter account was in the wrong.uziq wrote:
what happens if, for e.g., scientific agencies or national parks want to share their research findings w/r/t global warming, which does not tally with trump's team's PR message about global warming?Jay wrote:
Right, but all government agencies have been moving that way for decades. Here's an open letter to Obama complaining about all communications being directed through PR:
http://spj.org/pdf/news/obama-letter-final-08102015.pdf
Our government agencies are supposed to be apolitical. It's the primary reason they have jobs for life, it's supposed to be a professional service that rises above politics.
do you realise how crazy this territory is?
- SuperJail Warden
- Gone Forever
- +644|3985
It is stupid no doubt about that. But the department secretaries report to the president. There is nothing illegal about the WH gagging them.
Trump is the Republican's wet dream in that he will do all the radical things they secretly want to do and if anything goes wrong they can blame his madness and that he's not even a real Republican to begin with.uziq wrote:
hahaShahter wrote:
The more I look at this Trump comedy, the more I think that he's a scapegoat specifically prepared to take blame for something radical planned for USA by the part of their elite that put him in The White House. Something that, in their opinion, cannot be put off any longer but is impossible to sell to the public as necessary and unavoidable.
Then some stern old-schooler like Boehner can sweep in and leave all the extreme stuff exactly as Trump left it.
Fuck Israel
what if they want to publicize road closures? Park closures? Wildfire notices? It is the definition of stupiduziq wrote:
what if they want to publicise it on twitter?Jay wrote:
I imagine the research will still be published. I dunno. My point was that what trump's admin did wasn't out of the ordinary. The national park twitter account was in the wrong.uziq wrote:
what happens if, for e.g., scientific agencies or national parks want to share their research findings w/r/t global warming, which does not tally with trump's team's PR message about global warming?
do you realise how crazy this territory is?