I started on BF 2142, then travelled back in time and realised the further back i went, the better things got! i was like WOW! this is amazing! BF 1942 rocks! what no boosters?????!!!! WTF!?
Poll
What game did u start the battlefield series on?
| Bf1942 | 51% | 51% - 91 | ||||
| BF: Vietnam | 6% | 6% - 12 | ||||
| Bf2 | 32% | 32% - 58 | ||||
| I live in a Giant Bucket! | 9% | 9% - 17 | ||||
| Total: 178 | ||||||
I also like many others started in BF1942. However i never played online and stopped playing 1942 as quickly as i started and went on to OFP and then CS. I skipped Vietnam entirely and came back then ended up here with BF2.
1942, but just the Single Player. I didn't have internet in my room then. Still, SP was fun enough, though I didn't really know what I was missing out of on Multiplayer
1942. I loved it... then dc came out and I loved it more. Then galactic conquest... I loved it even more!!!
That was and still is one of the best games ever.
I'd still play it once and a while but I only have a 40gb hard drive and I need the room.
As for the present... BF2 rocks.
That was and still is one of the best games ever.
I'd still play it once and a while but I only have a 40gb hard drive and I need the room.
As for the present... BF2 rocks.
Ditto.Spearhead wrote:
1942, but just the Single Player. I didn't have internet in my room then. Still, SP was fun enough, though I didn't really know what I was missing out of on Multiplayer
I started around when bf1942 was released.
Since 1942
1942 although I loved BFV way more
BF2 on my bros account
42, when it came out...
played on the SDF el alamein server all days:)
played on the SDF el alamein server all days:)
Last edited by Mushroomcar (2006-06-10 16:37:07)
TrollmeaT wrote:
I started on the demo of 1942 the first day it came out.
vietnaaaaaaam
Desert Combat, here. my college roomate was General of Clan for ~GoG~. that's how I got into it.
TUESDAYS COMING, DID YOU BRING YOUR COAT!!?Poll wrote:
I live in a giant bucket!
[Ontopic]
I got 1942 in a package with the two boosters while vietnam was going do the dogs at pizza hut,
I loved SP, I played multiplayer for a while, but I was a noob back then, Hadnt heard of DC that time either
I feel ripped off now compaired to 1942, I mean, when that was out, you got multiplayer AND bots that were not the spawn of their sister, A campagine, and a more maps!!
All of this for $100 [Aus]
Now battlefield on the otherhand
A few annoying bugs [Never, ever had problems with 1942]
7 or 6 maps that only supported 16 player bots [No option to change ammount until 1.3]
Bots sucked donkey dick bigtime
SF is alright, nightmaps need some better coding, price is overrated for most [This game is rated M, so most kids wont have enough money to buy it]
Boosters have a total lack of content
[Cant comment on patches as I never patched 1942, mainly because I loved it and I felt it didnt need a patch, and mainly because I was the equivilent of nubsauce]
No Campaign!!
The game didnt have an original idea [DC]
They fucked up bigtime when they used higher-end coding, pushing most mid/low end users away [GeForce 4 users ect]
All of this for the same price as 1942 when it came out
You decide
Vietnam!
Same as both of you.Fuzzball_the_Shooter wrote:
Ditto.Spearhead wrote:
1942, but just the Single Player. I didn't have internet in my room then. Still, SP was fun enough, though I didn't really know what I was missing out of on Multiplayer
But I skipped BF:V.
Last edited by k30dxedle (2006-06-10 19:03:28)
My spoon is too big
1942 ftw. Gotta love Berlin, Omaha, Stalingrad, and of course........CORAL SEA!
BF1942 Multiplayer demo at a LAN a few days after it came out. I was VERY impressed
Incidently, I heard after the full game came out that someone had worked out a way to get Tobruk (from the singleplayer demo) working in the MP demo.
Incidently, I heard after the full game came out that someone had worked out a way to get Tobruk (from the singleplayer demo) working in the MP demo.
1942 but i said i live in a giant bucket cause thats cooler lol