Methinks that is what it's about, ground pounders have been bombed, strafed, rocketed, gunned down, and TV-missiled so many times that they(we?) want revenge, even if it's just one plane that will respawn in a minute. It just feels good.
I smell an unlock............................ for the anti-tank kit ....
NO BIG NO that is not good idea some planes are getting hitted down after 30s from takeoff already.
Check out nations at war mod it got anti air infintaryfunkstrong wrote:
It could be like anti-tank but with only 2 missiles or something. I KNOW that they exist. Look up FIM-92 Stinger on google. They could be nerfed so they don't do much damage to land vehicles. This would really balance out the air superiority. I don't know, just a thought. Sorry if somebody has already suggested it.
-Funk
Air vehicles are meant to dominate, that is why humans have spent so much time creating them.
I disagree also. BF2 does not need an AA-Class. That would definately make flying impossible. On certain maps there are already way too many STINGER sites as it is. With the improvement on the LOCK on planes/Helo it is almost too much.
Hopefully they do not add this class !
Hopefully they do not add this class !
Here we go again with what stuff's "meant" to do.
Well, if you want to go there,
A Stinger is meant to bring down an aircraft with a high hit-rate (think 1.2) with one shot.
A Sidewinder (F-35, F-18, and F-15) or Sea Sparrow (Essex) missile is meant to also kill with one shot with a high accuracy at medium-range - a few miles, larger than most, if not all, BF2 maps.
An IGLA is meant to do the same thing as the Stinger.
Well, if you want to go there,
A Stinger is meant to bring down an aircraft with a high hit-rate (think 1.2) with one shot.
A Sidewinder (F-35, F-18, and F-15) or Sea Sparrow (Essex) missile is meant to also kill with one shot with a high accuracy at medium-range - a few miles, larger than most, if not all, BF2 maps.
An IGLA is meant to do the same thing as the Stinger.
I would prefer if the commander of the team could choose where to put the AA/TOW's, I don't know of any map where the AA or TOW is in a good place, they always have it right in front of a big wall or make it hit the sandbags if it goes too low...
It's a good idea Think about it when that MEC chopper On sharqi is spawn raping like mad its better defence then been a sitting duck in aa. I think they should add it ppl who dont want it added are chopper whores.
yep i agree and they shouldnt be seen on a enemy/pilots hud for him or her to spot AA so easely[UCF]Dauntless wrote:
I would prefer if the commander of the team could choose where to put the AA/TOW's, I don't know of any map where the AA or TOW is in a good place, they always have it right in front of a big wall or make it hit the sandbags if it goes too low...
+1 ... Good idea ... not sure if it's possible due to system constraints ...[UCF]Dauntless wrote:
I would prefer if the commander of the team could choose where to put the AA/TOW's, I don't know of any map where the AA or TOW is in a good place, they always have it right in front of a big wall or make it hit the sandbags if it goes too low...