In 'Conquest: Assault' maps (Where one team has a UCB, and the other doesn't),
Why is the team with the UCB allowed to attack the other team's last base, but the side without the UCB is NOT allowed to attack the other team's last base (the UCB)?
EXAMPLE: Karkand (USMC has a UCB, MEC doesn't).
Say USMC have pushed MEC all the way back to the cement factory. USMC will be totally, balls out, attackin' the factory.
But what if MEC push USMC all the way back to the USMC base. Can't MEC get their balls out as well, and attack the UCB?
Why is that a kickable offence, but the attack on the cement factory is not an offence?
I think that if one team has played well and cornered the other team in their last base (Uncapturable or not), then they have earned the right to attack it. It's the other team's job to pull their socks up and try and salvage the match by fighting their way out of the mess they made themselves. I feel that's one of the more interesting situations, and I enjoy it even when I'm on the side that's screwed.
Why is the team with the UCB allowed to attack the other team's last base, but the side without the UCB is NOT allowed to attack the other team's last base (the UCB)?
EXAMPLE: Karkand (USMC has a UCB, MEC doesn't).
Say USMC have pushed MEC all the way back to the cement factory. USMC will be totally, balls out, attackin' the factory.
But what if MEC push USMC all the way back to the USMC base. Can't MEC get their balls out as well, and attack the UCB?
Why is that a kickable offence, but the attack on the cement factory is not an offence?
I think that if one team has played well and cornered the other team in their last base (Uncapturable or not), then they have earned the right to attack it. It's the other team's job to pull their socks up and try and salvage the match by fighting their way out of the mess they made themselves. I feel that's one of the more interesting situations, and I enjoy it even when I'm on the side that's screwed.