new ships perhaps?

2006-08-02 04:07:03

#1

xXSarnathXx: Decepticons forever!; +25|7079|Sweden

theese rubber boats that we get from the carriers stink, why cant we have a CB90 (combat boat 90, swedish boat) or the equivalent from the US navy (dont know any of ur boats so thats why i refereed to ours)

theese boats are fast, got some armor and got some good guns to show off with. i dont see why we have to travel in the toy-boats we got atm.

give us somethin proper, then perhaps wake would actually be a playable map

2006-08-02 04:23:49

#2

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7315|Reykjavík, Iceland.

The USS missouri and more is going to be in USI

2006-08-02 04:27:29

#3

DonFck: Hibernator; +3,227|7103|Finland

Instead of the rubber boats, Introducing an alternative that might be a bit faster: The Jurmo-class transport-boat:

https://www.mil.fi/merivoimat/esikunta/toim_kalusto_jurmo.jpg

To support the advancement:

https://www.mil.fi/merivoimat/esikunta/toim_kalusto_tornio.jpg

Last edited by DonFck (2006-08-02 04:28:39)

I need around tree fiddy.

2006-08-02 10:07:37

#4

maestrium: Member; +13|6956|Arizona

You are forgetting that the RIB's are also supposed to be for all of the theaters. If we gave all the PLA and MEC armies Navy boats, that would kinda be stupid, wouldn't it?

2006-08-02 15:25:51

#5

xXSarnathXx: Decepticons forever!; +25|7079|Sweden

ye, well im quite sure the PLA has boats of their own, and MEC could always get some from Russia if they dont have any. that doesnt feel like a big problem, also its mostly the USMC who got boats ingame

2006-08-02 15:26:59

#6

=X=Sceptique: Member; +1|6962

it would be awesome to be able to move the carrier, that way it would give a chance on wake to the USMC

2006-08-02 18:14:43

#7

maestrium: Member; +13|6956|Arizona

USMC already have a great chance at winning. I have been in several games within the last week where USMC beats PLA by taking all the points.

2006-08-02 18:22:21

#8

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7191|California

PBAsydney wrote:
The USS missouri and more is going to be in USI

will it be good though? i want motherfucking artillery flying out of those deck guns.

2006-08-02 18:27:35

#9

Miller: IT'S MILLER TIME!; +271|7227|United States of America

I want to be driving the carrier on wake. I could see it now...

"Take us straight into the middle."
"That'll get us killed you idiot."
"Not if we beach the carrier so we have a quick access point..."

2006-08-02 18:41:49

#10

manitobapaintballa: Member; +32|7090

lol good old netherlands, (they got the best shallow water craft period)

2006-08-02 18:42:14

#11

Swimmerxc: Member; +12|6949|DC/VA

xXSarnathXx wrote:
ye, well im quite sure the PLA has boats of their own, and MEC could always get some from Russia if they dont have any. that doesnt feel like a big problem, also its mostly the USMC who got boats ingame

PLA has this

https://img355.imageshack.us/img355/7538/220822306hel7.jpg

http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/littoral/type022.asp

2006-08-02 18:46:33

#12

BigmacK: Back from the Dead.; +628|7222|Chicago.

That dosen't look real to me.

2006-08-02 19:16:36

#13

Windrider_Melb: Pwned so often there's an IPO.; +29|6976|Melbourne, Australia

What kinds of boats does the USS Essex actually carry? Anyone think of that?

I think Wake is playable. I see the USMC win regularly. You take one of the rigid-hulled inflatable assault boats and stay in the mist, toodle around the back of the island, and come ashore on a flag.

You just need to convince your team that establishing air-superiority is a necessary step towards making a successful landing. If Wake is unplayable it's because your team-mates aren't using the most powerful weapon at their disposal.

\\'

2006-08-02 19:17:30

#14

BigmacK: Back from the Dead.; +628|7222|Chicago.

Windrider_Melb wrote:
If Wake is unplayable it's because your team-mates aren't using the most powerful weapon at their disposal.

\\'

QFE

So true...

2006-08-02 21:27:08

#15

Swimmerxc: Member; +12|6949|DC/VA

Windrider_Melb wrote:
What kinds of boats does the USS Essex actually carry? Anyone think of that?

I think Wake is playable. I see the USMC win regularly. You take one of the rigid-hulled inflatable assault boats and stay in the mist, toodle around the back of the island, and come ashore on a flag.

You just need to convince your team that establishing air-superiority is a necessary step towards making a successful landing. If Wake is unplayable it's because your team-mates aren't using the most powerful weapon at their disposal.

\\'

Form into squads get 2-3 squad leader to take blackhawk and land at airfield, while the rest of the team attacks from the arty island. spwan on squadleader take airfield, kiss goodbye to J-10 nightmares

That dosen't look real to me.

http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/littoral/type022.asp

2006-08-02 21:34:16

#16

Windrider_Melb: Pwned so often there's an IPO.; +29|6976|Melbourne, Australia

Swimmerxc wrote:
Form into squads get 2-3 squad leader to take blackhawk and land at airfield, while the rest of the team attacks from the arty island. spwan on squadleader take airfield, kiss goodbye to J-10 nightmares

Oh yeah - I've done that a few times. Just have to take the chopper high - around 400 metres. The typical jet jockey is so focussed on the ground targets he hardly notices. Then power spiral down behind the airfield and... well. You know the rest.

\\'

2006-08-18 08:51:18

#17

masterHouse: Official Heckler & Koch ambassador; +8|7188|Veenendaal, The Netherlands

No, we need the Dutch ship: the H.M. Zeven Provinciën to attack the Chinese airfield on Wake. (if you want to see the vessel use google)

BF2S Forums new ships perhaps?

PBAsydney wrote:

xXSarnathXx wrote:

Windrider_Melb wrote:

Windrider_Melb wrote:

Swimmerxc wrote:

Board footer