I played 9 rounds of RTJ last night with about 12 of my friends on a 64 player server and what can I say I had a great time blowing up armor, running, gunning and taking flags w/o some flying whore killing me from the unknown. Great map you can actually take cover from armor and you can pwn with armor because there's plenty of it
Yeah I second you on that great map its mega fun c4ing tanks up, urban warfare is so intense and not much of that spawn killing compared to karkland.
Reminds me of a Special Forces map fixed with a regular map.
Good call, so far it's pretty fun.
Ya its a good map to get alot of road kills with.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7151
I played this back in the beta. I like the map, but it just doesn't seem like DICE work to me. It looks like a cheesy custom map. The terrain is very dull, it's all dull.
I like the map
I love it!
Like it, but without vehicles it seems like a sniper feast untill some point in the city is taken.
i think its an okay map, i like to snipe on it but the thing is for me is that i lag weed on that map
with all the negative posts about this map/patch its good to see I'm not the only one that actually likes it
It needs a plane and some heli's
The only thing I hate about it is all of the gaymores I mean claymores.
Or maybe a chopper would be better... a plane or a so called bomber is going to ruin everything in the game cause there is no way to run.rustynutz wrote:
It needs a plane and some heli's
love that map
Its a good map, but when it is infantry only on a 64 guy server, I think 90% of the people are snipers, Im a medic whore and i love using my shock paddles and getting in the top 3, but for fuck sake get a flag!
I enjoy it. I'm gunna play with tanks next time, infantry only is quite fun also.
i agree. just like sf but without cool tools such as tear gas grappling hooks and zip linesReject_Wolf wrote:
Reminds me of a Special Forces map fixed with a regular map.
would be neat if they could add effects like wind, weather and change from day time to night
Yes let's screw a good map up!rustynutz wrote:
It needs a plane and some heli's
I played on a infantry/64 player map last night on the U.S. side, it sure was a bitch to get past the front line of snipers on foot. It took a while, but once we did the game was on.Wojo97civic wrote:
Its a good map, but when it is infantry only on a 64 guy server, I think 90% of the people are snipers, Im a medic whore and i love using my shock paddles and getting in the top 3, but for fuck sake get a flag!
Its a pretty decent map. I agree with a post about the map being a bit dull - but thats only the terrain. The city is pretty detailed and plays well.
Claywhores are much less of a problem compared to karkand, yet it still has the CQC of the map and less nade spamming.
What also impresses me so far, is that for a city map, there seems to be a LOT of people using AT kits to hold off armour, rather than try and be a spec ops faggot and attempt C4 charges.
The only problem I have about it, is that in the 20 rounds Ive played it - Ive seen the MEC win once. It seems greatly biased for the US. They even get a third tank from the front CP (outpost??). In fact, in terms of who wins/loses - it is the exact opposite of Sharqi where MEC always win and have the massive advantage.
Claywhores are much less of a problem compared to karkand, yet it still has the CQC of the map and less nade spamming.
What also impresses me so far, is that for a city map, there seems to be a LOT of people using AT kits to hold off armour, rather than try and be a spec ops faggot and attempt C4 charges.
The only problem I have about it, is that in the 20 rounds Ive played it - Ive seen the MEC win once. It seems greatly biased for the US. They even get a third tank from the front CP (outpost??). In fact, in terms of who wins/loses - it is the exact opposite of Sharqi where MEC always win and have the massive advantage.
I like it.
About the AT/c4 I ahve to really disagree, every time i played there were at least 4 jihad jeepers per team(32 player map). Also i have played 14 times won 12 and only been USMC twice (2 wins). But this may have been because It was a 32 player map (less armor) and MEC acually defended the market/junkyard area with AT mines and C4 traps.Snake wrote:
Its a pretty decent map. I agree with a post about the map being a bit dull - but thats only the terrain. The city is pretty detailed and plays well.
Claywhores are much less of a problem compared to karkand, yet it still has the CQC of the map and less nade spamming.
What also impresses me so far, is that for a city map, there seems to be a LOT of people using AT kits to hold off armour, rather than try and be a spec ops faggot and attempt C4 charges.
The only problem I have about it, is that in the 20 rounds Ive played it - Ive seen the MEC win once. It seems greatly biased for the US. They even get a third tank from the front CP (outpost??). In fact, in terms of who wins/loses - it is the exact opposite of Sharqi where MEC always win and have the massive advantage.
But Ilove the map, its much more like sharqi and SF maps which are my favourite, so I expect I'll be playing alot more.
It's nice to see 'good job EA' used in a non-sarcastic way