Why are you so angry? Why attack me and make assumptions to my response? Go get laid. I never said he thought we should invade NK ( he asked why we werent) , I was giving a reason why we werent. Which is the question he asked.Reciprocity wrote:
wow, such insight. Letterman wasnt suggesting that we should invade North Korea. The point he was making was that we invaded Iraq because we thought Hussein had weapons, We know NK has weapons but we aren't invading. Why?deeznutz1245 wrote:
What I dont understand is Lettermans obvious contradiction. He says he wants American soldiers to stop dying but then asks why we are not immediately invading North Korea instead of Iraq. Military actions take considerable planning to minimize casualty. He understands that right? Any thoughts please share but dont attack me. I dont have the energy tonight because a tree fell on my garage (dont worry the boat is ok).
And if military actions take so much planning then why are we now stuck in the quagmire that is Iraq? Ooh, lemme guess your response.
"Wrong, dumbass, the invasion was a complete success. We kicked Hussein's ass."
and that's a neat, child-like, if not semantical response.
Last edited by deeznutz1245 (2006-10-28 20:57:29)
Malloy must go