Okay with the PS3 launch less than 10 days away in the US, I'm hearing a lot of "oh PS3 is too expensive, I'll get a 360 instead) because its a set price of $499 (20gb) and $599 (60gb). What they dont know is that the 360 doesnt include HD/DVD, where as PS3 includes Blu-Ray drive and on release, will be the cheapest Blu-Ray player available. (I went into a shop today and saw a samsung Blu-Ray drive it was selling at £999)
Now, I may sound like a Sony fan boy, but I've owned a Xbox, Gamecube and PS2 and for overall gaming experience, I preferred the PS2. It looks like I'll be sticking with Sony again this year. I was planning on getting a 360 but after all the problems I heard with the systems and lack of killer titles (Dead Rising and GOW are the only titles worth buying a 360 for), I opted out of buying one.
As for the Wii, I don't intend on ever owned a console that involves the name "Wii" (Said Wee, which is an English word for Piss) and waving your arms around like someone with special needs.
After doing my own research on the price difference between a 360 and a PS3 (both core systems), I've come to the conclusion that the core PS3 is infact cheaper than a 360 IF. See for yourself
This is why ps3 > 360
PS3 Core Console: $499
360 Core Console: $299
Harddrive:
PS3: 20GB
360: None
Online:
PS3: Free
360: $60
HD player:
PS3: Built in Blu-Ray/Free
360: None - Standard DVD drive. HD/DVD add-on required $200
Final pricing:
PS3: $499
360: $559
The same also applies to the "premium" versions, but with the PS3 you get a 60gb HDD instead of a 20GB. If you are to get a 360 to the standard of a PS3 (HD/DVD/ONLINE PLAY) it's going to cost you $60 extra for a 360
I know most will be sticking to PC, as it's the best choice, but as a console lover I'm doing this for anyone who might be having trouble deciding on what to buy, or anyone misinformed about the prices for the next gen consoles.
(For Wii fans, I didnt bother including this because I see it as an upgraded Gamecube with a wavey remote, not a next gen console)
Also, I'm very jealous, but still very hyped about the release, despite it not being released till March in my country Lack of mass production of blu-ray diode FTL
Now, I may sound like a Sony fan boy, but I've owned a Xbox, Gamecube and PS2 and for overall gaming experience, I preferred the PS2. It looks like I'll be sticking with Sony again this year. I was planning on getting a 360 but after all the problems I heard with the systems and lack of killer titles (Dead Rising and GOW are the only titles worth buying a 360 for), I opted out of buying one.
As for the Wii, I don't intend on ever owned a console that involves the name "Wii" (Said Wee, which is an English word for Piss) and waving your arms around like someone with special needs.
After doing my own research on the price difference between a 360 and a PS3 (both core systems), I've come to the conclusion that the core PS3 is infact cheaper than a 360 IF. See for yourself
This is why ps3 > 360
PS3 Core Console: $499
360 Core Console: $299
Harddrive:
PS3: 20GB
360: None
Online:
PS3: Free
360: $60
HD player:
PS3: Built in Blu-Ray/Free
360: None - Standard DVD drive. HD/DVD add-on required $200
Final pricing:
PS3: $499
360: $559
The same also applies to the "premium" versions, but with the PS3 you get a 60gb HDD instead of a 20GB. If you are to get a 360 to the standard of a PS3 (HD/DVD/ONLINE PLAY) it's going to cost you $60 extra for a 360
I know most will be sticking to PC, as it's the best choice, but as a console lover I'm doing this for anyone who might be having trouble deciding on what to buy, or anyone misinformed about the prices for the next gen consoles.
(For Wii fans, I didnt bother including this because I see it as an upgraded Gamecube with a wavey remote, not a next gen console)
Also, I'm very jealous, but still very hyped about the release, despite it not being released till March in my country Lack of mass production of blu-ray diode FTL
Last edited by E7IX3R (2006-11-07 17:23:26)